A Selectionist Theory of Language Acquisition

This paper argues that developmental patterns in child language be taken seriously in computational models of language acquisition, and proposes a formal theory that meets this criterion. We first present developmental facts that are problematic for statistical learning approaches which assume no prior knowledge of grammar, and for traditional learnability models which assume the learner moves from one UG-defined grammar to another. In contrast, we view language acquisition as a population of grammars associated with "weights", that compete in a Darwinian selectionist process. Selection is made possible by the variational properties of individual grammars; specifically, their differential compatibility with the primary linguistic data in the environment. In addition to a convergence proof, we present empirical evidence in child language development, that a learner is best modeled as multiple grammars in co-existence and competition.

[1]  Harley Bornbach,et al.  An introduction to mathematical learning theory , 1967 .

[2]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  The Child Language Data Exchange System: an update , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[3]  H. Clahsen.  Verb inflections in German child language: acquisition of agreement markings and the functions they encode , 1986 .

[4]  A. Kroch.  Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change , 1989, Language Variation and Change.

[5]  S. Crain,et al.  Structure dependence in grammar formation , 1987 .

[6]  Nina Hyams,et al.  Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters , 1986 .

[7]  Frederick Mosteller,et al.  Stochastic Models for Learning , 1956 .

[8]  S. Pinker.  Formal models of language learning , 1979, Cognition.

[9]  G. Edelman.  Neural Darwinism: The Theory Of Neuronal Group Selection , 1989 .

[10]  Carl de Marcken,et al.  Unsupervised language acquisition , 1996, ArXiv.

[11]  J. AnneMiller.  The Balancing act , 1976 .

[12]  Eric Brill,et al.  Automatic Grammar Induction and Parsing Free Text: A Transformation-Based Approach , 1993, ACL.

[13]  A. E. Pierce,et al.  Language Acquisition and Syntactic Theory: A Comparative Analysis of French and English Child Grammars , 1992 .

[14]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[15]  Andreas Stolcke,et al.  Bayesian learning of probabilistic language models , 1994 .

[16]  Eugene Charniak,et al.  Statistical language learning , 1997 .

[17]  J. Changeux.  L'homme neuronal , 1983 .

[18]  George E. Ferris,et al.  An Introduction to Mathematical Learning Theory , 1966 .

[19]  R. Lewontin.  The organism as the subject and object of evolution , 1983 .

[20]  Janet D. Fodor.  Unambiguous Triggers , 1998, Linguistic Inquiry.

[21]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  The acquisition of syntactic knowledge , 1985 .

[22]  Kumpati S. Narendra,et al.  Learning automata - an introduction , 1989 .

[23]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  P. Niyogi,et al.  A language learning model for finite parameter spaces , 1996, Cognition.

[25]  Bezalel Elan Dresher,et al.  Charting the Learning Path: Cues to Parameter Setting , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[26]  Virginia Valian.  Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children , 1991, Cognition.

[27]  J. Elman,et al.  Learning Rediscovered , 1996, Science.

[28]  R. Brown.  A First Language , 1973 .

[29]  Kenneth Wexler,et al.  Formal Principles of Language Acquisition , 1980 .

[30]  L. Haegeman.  Root Infinitives, Clitics and Truncated Structures , 1996 .

[31]  Noam Chomsky.  Reflections on Language. , 1977 .

[32]  C Snow,et al.  Child language data exchange system , 1984, Journal of Child Language.

[33]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Language Acquisition and Use: Learning and Applying Probabilistic Constraints , 1997, Science.

[34]  R. Clark.  The Selection of Syntactic Knowledge , 1992 .