Effects of picrotoxin and strychnine on rabbit retinal ganglion cells: lateral interactions for cells with more complex receptive fields.

1. The effects of picrotoxin and strychnine were tested on the receptive fields of direction sensitive cells, orientation sensitive cells, local edge detectors, uniformity detectors and large field units in the rabbit retina. 2. Picrotoxin eliminated the direction specificity and size specificity of 'on‐off' and 'on' directionally sensitive cells for both black and white objects. Picrotoxin also made 'on' directionally sensitive cells responsive to faster velocities. 3. Picrotoxin eliminated the orientation specificity of orientation sensitive cells, and changed the bar‐flank arrangement of the receptive field into a centre surround arrangement. Thus, the orientation specificity is due to inhibitory rather than excitatory mechanisms. 4. Picrotoxin altered the speed sensitivity of large field units so that they responded to slow speeds as well as fast ones, like centre surround Y cells. 5. Strychnine abolished the size specificity of local edge detectors and changed their speed specificity so that they responded to faster speeds. 6. Picrotoxin changed a uniformity detector into a sustained on centre cell. 7. Strychnine did not effect the direction specificity of directionally sensitive cells, the orientation specificity of orientation sensitive cells, or the speed specificity of large field units. Picrotoxin did not affect the size specificity of local edge detectors. 8. Picrotoxin and strychnine usually had opposing effects on the transient responses of these units to spots and annuli. In general picrotoxin prolonged and enhanced these responses at both on and off, and strychnine shortened them. 9. The effect of these drugs for every type of ganglion cell with complex receptive field properties was to make the receptive field more simple. The orientation selective cells, large field cells, 'on' direction selective cells and uniformity detectors seem to be centre surround cells with special properties that are abolished by these drugs. The 'on‐off' direction selective cells and local edge detectors still on‐off receptive fields, but in each case one of the drugs abolished the feature that was the basis for the cell's name.

[1]  E. D. Adrian,et al.  The action of light on the eye , 1927 .

[2]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  H. Barlow,et al.  Selective Sensitivity to Direction of Movement in Ganglion Cells of the Rabbit Retina , 1963, Science.

[4]  H. Barlow,et al.  Retinal ganglion cells responding selectively to direction and speed of image motion in the rabbit , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  F. Newell.  The Rabbit in Eye Research , 1965 .

[6]  H. Barlow,et al.  The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  W. Levick.  Receptive fields and trigger features of ganglion cells in the visual streak of the rabbit's retina , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  J. Dowling,et al.  Synaptic organization of the frog retina: an electron microscopic analysis comparing the retinas of frogs and primates , 1968, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[9]  B. Haber,et al.  The γ-aminobutyric acid system in rabbit retina , 1968 .

[10]  M. Straschill.  Actions of drugs on single neurons in the cat's retina , 1968 .

[11]  C. W. Oyster,et al.  The analysis of image motion by the rabbit retina , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  A. Takeuchi,et al.  A study of the action of picrotoxin on the inhibitory neuromuscular junction of the crayfish , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  D. Pollen,et al.  Neurotransmission in central nervous tissue: a study of isolated rabbit retina. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  M. Dubin.  The inner plexiform layer of the vertebrate retina: A quantitative and comparative electron microscopic analysis , 1970, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  F. Werblin.  Response of retinal cells to moving spots: intracellular recording in Necturus maculosus. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  D. A. Burkhardt.  Proximal negative response of frog retina. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  A Gallego,et al.  Horizontal and amacrine cells in the mammal's retina. , 1971, Vision research.

[18]  F S Werblin,et al.  Lateral Interactions at Inner Plexiform Layer of Vertebrate Retina: Antagonistic Responses to Change , 1972, Science.

[19]  B. Ehinger.  Cellular location of the uptake of some amino acids into the rabbit retina. , 1972, Brain research.

[20]  B. Ehinger,et al.  Uptake of the putative neurotransmitter, glycine, into the rabbit retina. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[21]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Striate neurons: receptive field organization. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[22]  D. A. Burkhardt,et al.  Effects of picrotoxin and strychnine upon electrical activity of the proximal retina. , 1972, Brain research.

[23]  S. Roper,et al.  The membrane effects, and sensitivity to strychnine, of neural inhibition of the Mauthner cell, and its inhibition by glycine and GABA , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Receptive fields of simple cells in the cat striate cortex , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  K. Krnjević,et al.  Chemical Nature of Synaptic Transmission in Vertebrates , 1974 .

[26]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Orientation specificity of cells in cat striate cortex. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  D. R. Curtis,et al.  Amino acid transmitters in the mammalian central nervous system. , 1974, Ergebnisse der Physiologie, biologischen Chemie und experimentellen Pharmakologie.

[28]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Effects of bicuculline on functions of inhibition in visual cortex , 1974, Nature.

[29]  B. Ehinger,et al.  Uptake of certain possible neurotransmitters into retinal neurons of some mammals. , 1974, Experimental eye research.

[30]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  A study of inhibitory antagonism in cat visual cortex , 1975, Brain Research.

[31]  A. Sillito.  The contribution of inhibitory mechanisms to the receptive field properties of neurones in the striate cortex of the cat. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  M. Voaden,et al.  Autoradiographic identification of the cells accumulating3H γ-aminobutyric acid in mammalian retinae: A species comparison , 1975, Vision Research.

[33]  N. Daw,et al.  Directionally sensitive ganglion cells in the rabbit retina: specificity for stimulus direction, size, and speed. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The involvement of gamma-aminobutyric acid in the organization of cat retinal ganglion cell receptive fields. A study with picrotoxin and bicuculline , 1976, The Journal of general physiology.

[35]  R. West.  Light and electron microscopy of the ground squirrel retina: Functional considerations , 1976, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[36]  B. Ehinger.  Selective neuronal accumulation of ω-amino acids in the rabbit retina , 1976, Brain Research.

[37]  H. J. Wyatt,et al.  Specific effects of neurotransmitter antagonists on ganglion cells in rabbit retina. , 1976, Science.

[38]  R. C. Emerson,et al.  Simple striate neurons in the cat. II. Mechanisms underlying directional asymmetry and directional selectivity. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  R. Dacheux,et al.  Amacrine cells in Necturus retina: evidence for independent gamma-aminobutyric acid- and glycine-releasing neurons. , 1977, Science.

[40]  J. Caldwell,et al.  Effects of picrotoxin and strychnine on rabbit retinal ganglion cells: changes in centre surround receptive fields. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  J. Caldwell,et al.  New properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  C. Rovainen,et al.  Conductance increases produced by glycine and gamma‐aminobutyric acid in lamprey interneurones. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.