Approaches to Innovation: Exploitation or Exploration? A Simulation Study

This study attempts to explore how firms’ productive opportunity and performance evolve differently under different assumptions of firms’ motivation and propensity to explore new technology, given the characteristics of the demand. On the one hand, exploiting existing competencies may provide short-term success, but competence exploration can become a hindrance to the firm’s long-term viability. On the other hand, deploying resource combinations as to an externally focused search inherently mitigates the risk of failure, while deploying resource combination as to an internally focused search may dramatically enlarge the set of all possible deployments that are within someone’s ability and means to execute. A computational model using agent-based simulation techniques is proposed. The results of the computational model suggest that the degree of heterogeneity of the market strongly affects the performances achievable through different strategic approaches.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[2]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Markets, Firms, and the Process of Economic Development , 1999 .

[3]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[4]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Technological and product-market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry , 2004 .

[5]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[6]  G. Day.  Creating a Market-Driven Organization , 1999 .

[7]  K. Pavitt.  What We Know about the Strategic Management of Technology , 1990 .

[8]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[9]  Reiko Aoki,et al.  R&D Competition for Product Innovation: An Endless Race , 1991 .

[10]  Akihiro Inoue,et al.  Building Market Structures from Consumer Preferences , 1996 .

[11]  R. Katila,et al.  Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction , 2002 .

[12]  Daniel A. Levinthal.  Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[13]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[14]  J. Schumpeter.  The Creative Response in Economic History , 1947, The Journal of Economic History.

[15]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[16]  David J. Teece,et al.  Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm , 1982 .

[17]  Jan W. Rivkin.  Reproducing Knowledge: Replication Without Imitation at Moderate Complexity , 2001 .

[18]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[19]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[20]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[21]  Richard L. Van Horn,et al.  Validation of Simulation Results , 1971 .

[22]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[23]  Arie Y. Lewin,et al.  Interdependency, Competition, and Industry Dynamics , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Richard W. Conway,et al.  Some Tactical Problems in Digital Simulation , 1963 .

[25]  Johannes Hörner,et al.  A Perpetual Race to Stay Ahead , 2004 .

[26]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[27]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[28]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[29]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Patterned Interactions in Complex Systems: Implications for Exploration , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[30]  K. Lancaster.  A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  H. Gatignon,et al.  Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance , 1997 .

[32]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  J. March.  Continuity and Change in Theories of Organizational Action , 1996 .

[34]  W. Abernathy.  Innovation : Mapping the winds of creative destruction * , 2003 .

[35]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[36]  J. Kleijnen.  Analyzing simulation experiments with common random numbers , 1988 .

[37]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Customer-Oriented Approaches to Identifying Product-Markets , 1979 .

[38]  D. Teece,et al.  Fundamental Issues in Strategy: A Research Agenda , 1994 .

[39]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  The Multifaceted Nature of Exploration and Exploitation: Value of Supply, Demand, and Spatial Search for Innovation , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[40]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[41]  G. Hult,et al.  MARKET ORIENTATION AND PERFORMANCE: AN INTEGRATION OF DISPARATE APPROACHES , 2005 .

[42]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. , 1996 .

[43]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.