Motor Inhibition to Dangerous Objects: Electrophysiological Evidence for Task-dependent Aversive Affordances
暂无分享,去创建一个
Daniele Caligiore | Anna M. Borghi | Magda Mustile | Dimitrios Kourtis | Flora Giocondo | D. Kourtis | D. Caligiore | A. Borghi | Magda Mustile | Flora Giocondo | Daniele Caligiore
[1] Peng Liu,et al. Increasing Perceptual Salience Diminishes the Motor Interference Effect From Dangerous Objects , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.
[2] Christina F. Lavallee,et al. Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions. , 2013, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[3] J. Polich. Updating P 300 : An Integrative Theory of P 3 a and P 3 b , 2009 .
[4] Liang Zhao. The Automaticity of Affordance of Dangerous Object , 2016, The Spanish Journal of Psychology.
[5] Peng Liu,et al. Time-frequency analysis of event-related potentials associated with the origin of the motor interference effect from dangerous objects , 2018, Brain Research.
[6] R. Nicoletti,et al. Simon-Like and Functional Affordance Effects with Tools: The Effects of Object Perceptual Discrimination and Object Action State , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[7] Ehud Zohary,et al. Is That Near My Hand? Multisensory Representation of Peripersonal Space in Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[8] D. Brouillet,et al. Is there any Influence of Variations in Context on Object-Affordance Effects in Schizophrenia? Perception of Property and Goals of Action , 2016, Front. Psychol..
[9] Swann Pichon,et al. Threat prompts defensive brain responses independently of attentional control. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.
[10] G. F. Tremblay,et al. The Prefrontal Cortex , 1989, Neurology.
[11] Jody C. Culham,et al. Orientation sensitivity to graspable objects: An fMRI adaptation study , 2007, NeuroImage.
[12] Jerram L. Brown,et al. Defence, attack, and flight elicited by electrical stimulation of the hypothalamus of the cat , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.
[13] R. Passingham,et al. Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.
[14] Mario Liotti,et al. Inhibitory control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: event-related potentials identify the processing component and timing of an impaired right-frontal response-inhibition mechanism , 2000, Biological Psychiatry.
[15] R. Ellis,et al. Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. , 2000, British journal of psychology.
[16] John Duncan,et al. A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.
[17] A. Chemero. An Outline of a Theory of Affordances , 2003, How Shall Affordances be Refined? Four Perspectives.
[18] T. Ziemke,et al. Theories and computational models of affordance and mirror systems: An integrative review , 2013, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[19] Yann Coello,et al. Motor representations and the perception of space: perceptual judgments of the boundary of action space , 2010 .
[20] S. Hillyard,et al. Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[21] Nicholas P. Holmes,et al. The body schema and multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space , 2004, Cognitive Processing.
[22] Jeff T. Larsen,et al. May I have your attention, please: Electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli , 2003, Neuropsychologia.
[23] R. Nicoletti,et al. Perceiving object dangerousness: an escape from pain? , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.
[24] Laura Busse,et al. Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults , 2006, Neuropsychologia.
[25] R. Knight,et al. Mechanisms of human attention: event-related potentials and oscillations , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[26] Y. Coello,et al. EEG μ rhythm in virtual reality reveals that motor coding of visual objects in peripersonal space is task dependent , 2016, Cortex.
[27] J. Hohnsbein,et al. Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[28] Dietmar Heinke,et al. Implied actions between paired objects lead to affordance selection by inhibition. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[29] R. Nicoletti,et al. Keep Away from Danger: Dangerous Objects in Dynamic and Static Situations , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[30] F. Manes,et al. N400 ERPs for actions: building meaning in context , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[31] Blake W. Johnson,et al. Comparison of the N300 and N400 ERPs to picture stimuli in congruent and incongruent contexts , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[32] Satoshi Endo,et al. Contribution of the motor system to the perception of reachable space: an fMRI study , 2014, The European journal of neuroscience.
[33] Valeria I. Petkova,et al. Integration of visual and tactile signals from the hand in the human brain: an FMRI study. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.
[34] R. Andersen,et al. Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.
[35] John Bridgeman,et al. Bodies and other visual objects: the dialectics of reaching toward objects , 2013, Psychological research.
[36] L. Wheaton,et al. One hand, two objects: Emergence of affordance in contexts , 2012, Brain and Cognition.
[37] J. Gibson. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .
[38] K Richard Ridderinkhof,et al. ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task. , 2004, Psychophysiology.
[39] L. Barsalou,et al. Perspective in the conceptualization of categories , 2019, Psychological research.
[40] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[41] E. Donchin,et al. P300 and tracking difficulty: evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. , 1980, Psychophysiology.
[42] Jun'ichi Katayama,et al. Difficulty of Discrimination Modulates Attentional Capture by Regulating Attentional Focus , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[43] G. Humphreys,et al. The paired-object affordance effect. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[44] W. Epstein,et al. Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[45] Emily Balcetis,et al. Affective Signals of Threat Increase Perceived Proximity , 2013, Psychological science.
[46] H. Bokura,et al. Frontal lobe contribution to response inhibition process—an ERP study and aging effect , 2002 .
[47] Andrea Flumini,et al. Context and hand posture modulate the neural dynamics of tool–object perception , 2013, Neuropsychologia.
[48] G Rizzolatti,et al. The Space Around Us , 1997, Science.
[49] G. Pellegrino,et al. Peripersonal space in the brain , 2015, Neuropsychologia.
[50] Robert J. Barry,et al. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: The N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[51] Tina Iachini,et al. Embodied perception of reachable space: how do we manage threatening objects? , 2012, Cognitive Processing.
[52] W. Prinz,et al. N400-like negativities in action perception reflect the activation of two components of an action representation , 2009, Social Neuroscience.
[53] C. Spence,et al. Prior-entry: A review , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.
[54] R. Ellis,et al. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[55] S. Tipper,et al. Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[56] L. Riggio,et al. The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect. , 2008, Acta psychologica.
[57] L. Buxbaum,et al. Visual context modulates potentiation of grasp types during semantic object categorization , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[58] Lucia Riggio,et al. Stable and variable affordances are both automatic and flexible , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[59] Bettina Forster,et al. An ERP Investigation on Visuotactile Interactions in Peripersonal and Extrapersonal Space: Evidence for the Spatial Rule , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[60] Guy Vingerhoets,et al. Perceiving objects by their function: An EEG study on feature saliency and prehensile affordances , 2015, Biological Psychology.
[61] M. Koivisto,et al. An ERP study of change detection, change blindness, and visual awareness. , 2003, Psychophysiology.
[62] R. Verleger,et al. Effects on P3 of spreading targets and response prompts apart , 2017, Biological Psychology.
[63] M. Goldberg,et al. Space and attention in parietal cortex. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.
[64] M. Costantini,et al. The space of affordances: A TMS study , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[65] R. Andersen,et al. The posterior parietal cortex: Sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements , 2006, Neuropsychologia.
[66] Peng Liu,et al. Response inhibition or evaluation of danger? An event-related potential study regarding the origin of the motor interference effect from dangerous objects , 2017, Brain Research.
[67] Dylan F. Cooke,et al. Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior , 2006, Neuropsychologia.
[68] F Rösler,et al. Processing of incongruous mental calculation problems: evidence for an arithmetic N400 effect. , 1999, Psychophysiology.
[69] Roberta Adorni,et al. Is there a left hemispheric asymmetry for tool affordance processing? , 2013, Neuropsychologia.
[70] K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al. Conflict in the kitchen: Contextual modulation of responsiveness to affordances , 2016, Consciousness and Cognition.
[71] Y. Coello,et al. Conflict between object structural and functional affordances in peripersonal space , 2016, Cognition.
[72] Afdc Hamilton,et al. The motor hierarchy: from kinematics to goals and intentions , 2007 .
[73] R. Likert. “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.
[74] Ashwin G Ramayya,et al. A DTI investigation of neural substrates supporting tool use. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.
[75] S. Anderson,et al. Attentional processes link perception and action , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[76] E. Knudsen. Fundamental components of attention. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.
[77] C. Haenschel,et al. Objects rapidly prime the motor system when located near the dominant hand , 2017, Brain and Cognition.
[78] A. Cangelosi,et al. Electrophysiological Examination of Embodiment in Vision and Action , 2012, Psychological science.
[79] Scott T. Grafton,et al. Premotor Cortex Activation during Observation and Naming of Familiar Tools , 1997, NeuroImage.
[80] G. Harris,et al. Response inhibition in psychopathy: The frontal N2 and P3 , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.
[81] Blake W. Johnson,et al. High-density mapping in an N400 paradigm: evidence for bilateral temporal lobe generators , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[82] M. Carrasco,et al. Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement , 2000, Vision Research.
[83] T. Hubbard. Giving Cognition a Hand 1 RUNNING HEAD: Giving Cognition a Hand Giving Cognition a Hand: A Review of Ellis' (2018) Bodies and Other Objects: The Sensorimotor Foundations of Cognition , 2019 .
[84] Harold Bekkering,et al. Action semantics: A unifying conceptual framework for the selective use of multimodal and modality-specific object knowledge. , 2014, Physics of life reviews.
[85] A. Ohman,et al. Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[86] Fred H. Previc,et al. The Neuropsychology of 3-D Space , 1998 .
[87] Peng Liu,et al. A sequential trial effect based on the motor interference effect from dangerous objects: An ERP study , 2018, Brain and behavior.
[88] Gaetano Tieri,et al. Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.
[89] Jody C Culham,et al. Is That within Reach? fMRI Reveals That the Human Superior Parieto-Occipital Cortex Encodes Objects Reachable by the Hand , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[90] J. Polich. Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[91] Eric Achten,et al. Cerebral lateralization of praxis in right‐ and left‐handedness: Same pattern, different strength , 2012, Human brain mapping.
[92] G. Aschersleben,et al. The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[93] M. Costantini,et al. When objects are close to me: Affordances in the peripersonal space , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[94] E. Donchin,et al. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[95] François Osiurak,et al. What is an affordance? 40 years later , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[96] R. Ellis,et al. The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization , 2001 .
[97] G. Aschersleben,et al. Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.
[98] R. Ellis,et al. Action priming by briefly presented objects. , 2004, Acta psychologica.
[99] L. Wheaton,et al. The Role of Attention and Saccades on Parietofrontal Encoding of Contextual and Grasp-specific Affordances of Tools: An ERP Study , 2018, Neuroscience.
[100] Anna M. Borghi,et al. Grasping the pain: Motor resonance with dangerous affordances , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.
[101] Ying Choon Wu,et al. Are depictive gestures like pictures? Commonalities and differences in semantic processing , 2011, Brain and Language.
[102] D. Bub,et al. Grasping beer mugs: on the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[103] R. Ellis. Bodies and Other Objects , 2018 .
[104] Alice Mado Proverbio,et al. 250ms to code for action affordance during observation of manipulable objects , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[105] G. Mangun,et al. Luminance and spatial attention effects on early visual processing. , 1995, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[106] J. Hinojosa,et al. A close look into the near/far space division: A real-distance ERP study , 2014, Neuropsychologia.
[107] G. Rizzolatti,et al. Parietal Lobe: From Action Organization to Intention Understanding , 2005, Science.
[108] M. Kutas,et al. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.
[109] J. Theeuwes,et al. Potential threat attracts attention and interferes with voluntary saccades. , 2015, Emotion.
[110] Rolf Verleger,et al. Effects of relevance and response frequency on P3b amplitudes: Review of findings and comparison of hypotheses about the process reflected by P3b. , 2020, Psychophysiology.
[111] Phillip J Holcomb,et al. Semantic integration in videos of real-world events: an electrophysiological investigation. , 2003, Psychophysiology.
[112] A. Proverbio. Tool perception suppresses 10–12Hz μ rhythm of EEG over the somatosensory area , 2012, Biological Psychology.
[113] Ed Symes,et al. Dissociating object-based and space-based affordances , 2005 .
[114] I. Blanchette. Snakes, spiders, guns, and syringes: How specific are evolutionary constraints on the detection of threatening stimuli? , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[115] J. Hohnsbein,et al. ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. , 1999, Acta psychologica.