Newborns’ sensitivity to speed changes as a building block for animacy perception

The human visual system can discriminate between animate beings vs. inanimate objects on the basis of some kinematic cues, such as starting from rest and speed changes by self-propulsion. The ontogenetic origin of such capability is still under debate. Here we investigate for the first time whether newborns manifest an attentional bias toward objects that abruptly change their speed along a trajectory as contrasted with objects that move at a constant speed. To this end, we systematically manipulated the motion speed of two objects. An object that moves with a constant speed was contrasted with an object that suddenly increases (Experiment 1) or with one that suddenly decreases its speed (Experiment 2). When presented with a single speed change, newborns did not show any visual preference. However, newborns preferred an object that abruptly increases and then decreases its speed (Experiment 3), but they did not show any visual preference for the reverse sequence pattern (Experiment 4). Overall, results are discussed in line with the hypothesis of the existence of attentional biases in newborns that trigger their attention towards some visual cues of motion that characterized animate perception in adults.

[1]  A. Leslie Mapping the mind: ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity , 1994 .

[2]  G. Csibra Goal attribution to inanimate agents by 6.5-month-old infants , 2008, Cognition.

[3]  Nicole David,et al.  Parametric induction of animacy experience , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[4]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Infants’ perception of chasing , 2013, Cognition.

[5]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  F. Simion,et al.  A mental number line in human newborns , 2017, bioRxiv.

[7]  E. Spelke,et al.  Infants' knowledge of object motion and human action. , 1995 .

[8]  D. Poulin-Dubois,et al.  Speed and direction changes induce the perception of animacy in 7-month-old infants , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[9]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[10]  David H. Rakison,et al.  Developing knowledge of objects' motion properties in infancy , 2005, Cognition.

[11]  R. Kaufmann-Hayoz,et al.  Development of infants' sensitivity for slow and rapid motions , 1985 .

[12]  Attention-getting and attention-holding processes of infant visual preferences. , 1972, Child development.

[13]  György Gergely,et al.  One-year-old infants use teleological representations of actions productively , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  A. Leslie,et al.  Infants' perception of goal-directed actions: development through cue-based bootstrapping. , 2007, Developmental science.

[15]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Can a Self-Propelled Box Have a Goal? , 2005, Psychological science.

[16]  Katherine D. Kinzler,et al.  Core knowledge. , 2007, Developmental science.

[17]  Susan C. Johnson,et al.  Infants' attribution of a goal to a morphologically unfamiliar agent. , 2004, Developmental science.

[18]  Diane Poulin-Dubois,et al.  Infants' concept of animacy. , 1996 .

[19]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perception of Animacy from the Motion of a Single Object , 2000, Perception.

[20]  M. Rutherford Evidence for Specialized Perception of Animate Motion , 2013 .

[21]  Martha E Arterberry,et al.  Infant perceptual and conceptual categorization: the roles of static and dynamic stimulus attributes , 2002, Cognition.

[22]  Yuyan Luo,et al.  Three-month-old infants attribute goals to a non-human agent. , 2011, Developmental science.

[23]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  R. Abrams,et al.  Motion Onset Captures Attention , 2003, Psychological science.

[25]  G. Vallortigara Aristotle and the Chicken: Animacy and the Origins of Beliefs , 2012 .

[26]  S. Carey,et al.  Knowing who dunnit: Infants identify the causal agent in an unseen causal interaction. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[27]  Claudio A Casal,et al.  Possession in Football: More Than a Quantitative Aspect – A Mixed Method Study , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[28]  D. Poulin-Dubois,et al.  Infants' ability to associate motion paths with object kinds. , 2014, Infant behavior & development.

[29]  F. Simion,et al.  Visual cues of motion that trigger animacy perception at birth: the case of self-propulsion. , 2017, Developmental science.

[30]  E. Gyulai,et al.  Considerations on Perception of “Animacy” in the Motion of a Single Object , 2004, Perceptual and motor skills.

[31]  D. Rakison,et al.  Developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  G. Lupyan,et al.  Developing object concepts in infancy: an associative learning perspective. , 2008, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[33]  M. D. Rutherford,et al.  The Perception of Animacy in Young Children with Autism , 2006, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[34]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  Parametric animacy percept evoked by a single moving dot mimicking natural stimuli. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[35]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Innate sensitivity for self-propelled causal agency in newly hatched chicks , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  Life is not just in the fast lane: dissociating the perceptions of speed and animacy , 2007 .

[38]  L. Regolin,et al.  Spontaneous preference for visual cues of animacy in naïve domestic chicks: The case of speed changes , 2016, Cognition.

[39]  F. Simion,et al.  The cradle of causal reasoning: newborns' preference for physical causality. , 2013, Developmental science.

[40]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  The influence of spatial context and the role of intentionality in the interpretation of animacy from motion , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  J Wattam-Bell,et al.  Visual motion processing in one-month-old infants: Preferential looking experiments , 1996, Vision Research.

[42]  L. Craighero,et al.  Two-day-old newborns learn to discriminate accelerated-decelerated biological kinematics from constant velocity motion , 2019, Cognition.

[43]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Core knowledge of object, number, and geometry: A comparative and neural approach , 2012, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[44]  L. Surian,et al.  Infants' individuation of agents and inert objects. , 2010, Developmental science.

[45]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Embryonic Exposure to Valproic Acid Affects Social Predispositions for Dynamic Cues of Animate Motion in Newly-Hatched Chicks , 2019, Front. Physiol..

[46]  D. Premack The infant's theory of self-propelled objects , 1990, Cognition.

[47]  Philip J. Kellman,et al.  Ontogenesis of Space and Motion Perception , 1995 .

[48]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Newborns’ preference for goal-directed actions , 2011, Cognition.

[49]  R. Fox,et al.  The perception of biological motion by human infants. , 1982, Science.

[50]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in the newborn infant , 2011, Cognition.

[51]  F. Simion,et al.  From Motion Cues to Social Perception , 2013 .

[52]  S. Gelman,et al.  Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity In Cognition And Culture , 1994 .

[53]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  First Principles Organize Attention to and Learning About Relevant Data: Number and the Animate-Inanimate Distinction as Examples , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[54]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Roots of a social brain: Developmental models of emerging animacy-detection mechanisms , 2015, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[55]  R L FANTZ,et al.  The origin of form perception. , 1961, Scientific American.

[56]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Filial responses as predisposed and learned preferences: Early attachment in chicks and babies , 2017, Behavioural Brain Research.

[57]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Difference in Visual Social Predispositions Between Newborns at Low- and High-risk for Autism , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[58]  William G Hayward,et al.  Integrative processing of invariant aspects of faces: effect of gender and race processing on identity analysis. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[59]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Young infants’ reasoning about physical events involving inert and self-propelled objects , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[60]  M. D. Rutherford,et al.  Social perception : detection and interpretation of animacy, agency, and intention , 2013 .