Paint deposition modeling for trajectory planning on automotive surfaces

This research is focused on developing trajectory planning tools for the automotive painting industry. The geometric complexity of automotive surfaces and the complexity of the spray patterns produced by modern paint atomizers combine to make this a challenging and interesting problem. This paper documents our efforts to develop computationally tractable analytic deposition models for electrostatic rotating bell (ESRB) atomizers, which have recently become widely used in the automotive painting industry. The models presented in this paper account for both the effects of surface curvature as well as the deposition pattern of ESRB atomizers in a computationally tractable form, enabling the development of automated trajectory generation tools. We present experimental results used to develop and validate the models, and verify the interaction between the deposition pattern, the atomizer trajectory, and the surface curvature. Limitations of the deposition model with respect to predictions of paint deposition on highly curved surfaces are discussed. Note to Practitioners-The empirical paint deposition models developed herein, which are fit to experimental data, offer a significant improvement over models that are typically used in industrial robot simulations. The improved simulation results come without the computational cost and complexity of finite element methods. The models could be incorporated, as is, into existing industrial simulation tools, provided the users are cognizant of the model limitations with respect to highly curved surfaces. Although the models are based on readily available information, incorporating the models into existing robot simulation software would likely require support from the software vendor.

[1]  Howie Choset,et al.  Uniform Coverage of Simple Surfaces Embedded in for Auto-Body Painting , 2004, WAFR.

[2]  Howie Choset,et al.  Exact Cellular Decomposition of Closed Orientable Surfaces Embedded in R3. , 2001 .

[3]  T. Balkan,et al.  Process modeling, simulation, and paint thickness measurement for robotic spray painting , 2000, J. Field Robotics.

[4]  Hua Huang Simulation of Spray Transport from Rotary Cup Atomizer using KIVA-3 V , 2000 .

[5]  Jacob Braslaw,et al.  A finite-element model for an electrostatic bell sprayer , 1998 .

[6]  Suk-Hwan Suh,et al.  Development of an automatic trajectory planning system (ATPS) for spray painting robots , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Yifan Chen,et al.  Automated robot trajectory planning for spray painting of free-form surfaces in automotive manufacturing , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[8]  M. A. Sahir Arikan,et al.  Process modeling, simulation, and paint thickness measurement for robotic spray painting , 2000, J. Field Robotics.

[9]  Howie Choset,et al.  Towards optimal coverage of 2-dimensional surfaces embedded in IR/sup 3/: choice of start curve , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[10]  John K. Antonio,et al.  Fast solution techniques for a class of optimal trajectory planning problems with applications to automated spray coating , 1997, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[11]  Howie Choset,et al.  Uniform Coverage of Automotive Surface Patches , 2005, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[12]  Yoshimi Takeuchi,et al.  Teachingless spray-painting of sculptured surface by an industrial robot , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Weihua Sheng,et al.  Automated CAD-guided robot path planning for spray painting of compound surfaces , 2000, Proceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000) (Cat. No.00CH37113).

[14]  Howie Choset,et al.  Exact cellular decompositions in terms of critical points of Morse functions , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[15]  Henrik Gordon Petersen,et al.  Task curve planning for painting robots. I. Process modeling and calibration , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[16]  J. Thorpe Elementary Topics in Differential Geometry , 1979 .

[17]  Howie Choset,et al.  Exact cellular decomposition of closed orientable surfaces embedded in /spl Rfr//sup 3/ , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[18]  D. Rokossa,et al.  Process-oriented approach to an efficient off-line programming of industrial robots , 1998, IECON '98. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (Cat. No.98CH36200).

[19]  A.A. Elmoursi Electrical characterization of bell-type electrostatic painting systems , 1989, Conference Record of the IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting,.

[20]  Howie Choset,et al.  Sensor-based Coverage of Unknown Environments: Incremental Construction of Morse Decompositions , 2002, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[21]  Howie Choset,et al.  Morse Decompositions for Coverage Tasks , 2002, Int. J. Robotics Res..