Lévy‐based Modelling in Brain Imaging

.  A substantive problem in neuroscience is the lack of valid statistical methods for non-Gaussian random fields. In the present study, we develop a flexible, yet tractable model for a random field based on kernel smoothing of a so-called Levy basis. The resulting field may be Gaussian, but there are many other possibilities, including random fields based on Gamma, inverse Gaussian and normal inverse Gaussian (NIG) Levy bases. It is easy to estimate the parameters of the model and accordingly to assess by simulation the quantiles of test statistics commonly used in neuroscience. We give a concrete example of magnetic resonance imaging scans that are non-Gaussian. For these data, simulations under the fitted models show that traditional methods based on Gaussian random field theory may leave small, but significant changes in signal level undetected, while these changes are detectable under a non-Gaussian Levy model.

[1]  M. Clyde,et al.  Lévy Adaptive Regression Kernels , 2007 .

[2]  Leif Østergaard,et al.  Effects of tracer arrival time on flow estimates in MR perfusion‐weighted imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[4]  P. Guttorp,et al.  Studies in the history of probability and statistics XLIX On the Matérn correlation family , 2006 .

[5]  R. Fisher The Advanced Theory of Statistics , 1943, Nature.

[6]  Iwao Kanno,et al.  Regional distribution of human cerebral vascular mean transit time measured by positron emission tomography , 2003, NeuroImage.

[8]  Iwao Kanno,et al.  Cerebral Vascular Mean Transit Time in Healthy Humans: A Comparative Study with PET and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced MRI , 2007, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[9]  Eva B. Vedel Jensen,et al.  Levy-based growth models , 2008, 0803.0860.

[10]  B. Rosen,et al.  Tracer arrival timing‐insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion‐weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block‐circulant deconvolution matrix , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Michaela Prokešová,et al.  Lévy-based Cox point processes , 2008, Advances in Applied Probability.

[13]  J. Møller,et al.  Log Gaussian Cox Processes , 1998 .

[14]  R. Lord,et al.  THE USE OF THE HANKEL TRANSFORM IN STATISTICS: I. GENERAL THEORY AND EXAMPLES , 1954 .

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Topological FDR for neuroimaging , 2010, NeuroImage.

[16]  B. Rosen,et al.  High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  F. Bowman,et al.  Spatiotemporal Models for Region of Interest Analyses of Functional Neuroimaging Data , 2007 .

[18]  Gennady Samorodnitsky,et al.  Excursion sets of three classes of stable random fields , 2010, Advances in Applied Probability.

[19]  Roberto Viviani,et al.  Non-normality and transformations of random fields, with an application to voxel-based morphometry , 2007, NeuroImage.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Distributional Assumptions in Voxel-Based Morphometry , 2002, NeuroImage.

[21]  O. Barndorff-Nielsen,et al.  Meta-Times and Extended Subordination , 2012 .

[22]  Michael Oliver Flüß,et al.  Detection of changed regional cerebral blood flow in mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's dementia by perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging , 2008, NeuroImage.

[23]  O Salonen,et al.  Cerebral hemodynamics in a healthy population measured by dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging , 2003, Acta radiologica.

[24]  K. Worsley,et al.  Local Maxima and the Expected Euler Characteristic of Excursion Sets of χ 2, F and t Fields , 1994, Advances in Applied Probability.

[25]  Jeffrey S. Spence,et al.  Accounting for Spatial Dependence in the Analysis of SPECT Brain Imaging Data , 2007 .

[26]  Robert Haining,et al.  Statistics for spatial data: by Noel Cressie, 1991, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 900 p., ISBN 0-471-84336-9, US $89.95 , 1993 .

[27]  R. Lord THE USE OF THE HANKEL TRANSFORM IN STATISTICS , 1954 .

[28]  O. Barndorff-Nielsen,et al.  Lévy-based Tempo-Spatial Modelling; with Applications to Turbulence , 2003 .

[29]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Pattern of hemodynamic impairment in multiple sclerosis: Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T , 2006, NeuroImage.

[30]  J. Cao The size of the connected components of excursion sets of χ2, t and F fields , 1999, Advances in Applied Probability.

[31]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields , 2009, NeuroImage.

[32]  Ole E. Barndorff-Nielsen,et al.  Processes of normal inverse Gaussian type , 1997, Finance Stochastics.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multinomial inference on distributed responses in SPM , 2010, NeuroImage.

[34]  Carlo Gaetan,et al.  Spatial Statistics and Modeling , 2009 .

[35]  Leif Østergaard,et al.  Cerebral hemodynamics in a healthy population measured by dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging , 2003, Acta radiologica.

[36]  M Buxton-Thomas,et al.  Quantitative perfusion imaging in carotid artery stenosis using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[37]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis for CBF Activation Studies in Human Brain , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[38]  LÉVY-BASED ERROR PREDICTION IN CIRCULAR SYSTEMATIC SAMPLING , 2013 .

[39]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.

[40]  Gennady Samorodnitsky,et al.  High level excursion set geometry for non-Gaussian infinitely divisible random fields , 2009, 0907.3359.

[41]  M. T. Alodat,et al.  Skew-Gaussian random field , 2009, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[42]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.