Lévy‐based Modelling in Brain Imaging
暂无分享,去创建一个
Kim Mouridsen | Anders Rønn-Nielsen | Eva B. Vedel Jensen | K. Mouridsen | E. B. Vedel Jensen | K. Jonsdottir | Kristjana Ýr Jónsdóttir | Anders RØNN‐NIELSEN
[1] M. Clyde,et al. Lévy Adaptive Regression Kernels , 2007 .
[2] Leif Østergaard,et al. Effects of tracer arrival time on flow estimates in MR perfusion‐weighted imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[3] Karl J. Friston,et al. Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent , 1994, Human brain mapping.
[4] P. Guttorp,et al. Studies in the history of probability and statistics XLIX On the Matérn correlation family , 2006 .
[5] R. Fisher. The Advanced Theory of Statistics , 1943, Nature.
[6] Iwao Kanno,et al. Regional distribution of human cerebral vascular mean transit time measured by positron emission tomography , 2003, NeuroImage.
[8] Iwao Kanno,et al. Cerebral Vascular Mean Transit Time in Healthy Humans: A Comparative Study with PET and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced MRI , 2007, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.
[9] Eva B. Vedel Jensen,et al. Levy-based growth models , 2008, 0803.0860.
[10] B. Rosen,et al. Tracer arrival timing‐insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion‐weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block‐circulant deconvolution matrix , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[11] Karl J. Friston,et al. A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.
[12] Michaela Prokešová,et al. Lévy-based Cox point processes , 2008, Advances in Applied Probability.
[13] J. Møller,et al. Log Gaussian Cox Processes , 1998 .
[14] R. Lord,et al. THE USE OF THE HANKEL TRANSFORM IN STATISTICS: I. GENERAL THEORY AND EXAMPLES , 1954 .
[15] Karl J. Friston,et al. Topological FDR for neuroimaging , 2010, NeuroImage.
[16] B. Rosen,et al. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[17] F. Bowman,et al. Spatiotemporal Models for Region of Interest Analyses of Functional Neuroimaging Data , 2007 .
[18] Gennady Samorodnitsky,et al. Excursion sets of three classes of stable random fields , 2010, Advances in Applied Probability.
[19] Roberto Viviani,et al. Non-normality and transformations of random fields, with an application to voxel-based morphometry , 2007, NeuroImage.
[20] Karl J. Friston,et al. Distributional Assumptions in Voxel-Based Morphometry , 2002, NeuroImage.
[21] O. Barndorff-Nielsen,et al. Meta-Times and Extended Subordination , 2012 .
[22] Michael Oliver Flüß,et al. Detection of changed regional cerebral blood flow in mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's dementia by perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging , 2008, NeuroImage.
[23] O Salonen,et al. Cerebral hemodynamics in a healthy population measured by dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging , 2003, Acta radiologica.
[24] K. Worsley,et al. Local Maxima and the Expected Euler Characteristic of Excursion Sets of χ 2, F and t Fields , 1994, Advances in Applied Probability.
[25] Jeffrey S. Spence,et al. Accounting for Spatial Dependence in the Analysis of SPECT Brain Imaging Data , 2007 .
[26] Robert Haining,et al. Statistics for spatial data: by Noel Cressie, 1991, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 900 p., ISBN 0-471-84336-9, US $89.95 , 1993 .
[27] R. Lord. THE USE OF THE HANKEL TRANSFORM IN STATISTICS , 1954 .
[28] O. Barndorff-Nielsen,et al. Lévy-based Tempo-Spatial Modelling; with Applications to Turbulence , 2003 .
[29] Glyn Johnson,et al. Pattern of hemodynamic impairment in multiple sclerosis: Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T , 2006, NeuroImage.
[30] J. Cao. The size of the connected components of excursion sets of χ2, t and F fields , 1999, Advances in Applied Probability.
[31] Karl J. Friston,et al. False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields , 2009, NeuroImage.
[32] Ole E. Barndorff-Nielsen,et al. Processes of normal inverse Gaussian type , 1997, Finance Stochastics.
[33] Karl J. Friston,et al. Multinomial inference on distributed responses in SPM , 2010, NeuroImage.
[34] Carlo Gaetan,et al. Spatial Statistics and Modeling , 2009 .
[35] Leif Østergaard,et al. Cerebral hemodynamics in a healthy population measured by dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging , 2003, Acta radiologica.
[36] M Buxton-Thomas,et al. Quantitative perfusion imaging in carotid artery stenosis using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.
[37] Alan C. Evans,et al. A Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis for CBF Activation Studies in Human Brain , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.
[38] LÉVY-BASED ERROR PREDICTION IN CIRCULAR SYSTEMATIC SAMPLING , 2013 .
[39] Thomas E. Nichols,et al. Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.
[40] Gennady Samorodnitsky,et al. High level excursion set geometry for non-Gaussian infinitely divisible random fields , 2009, 0907.3359.
[41] M. T. Alodat,et al. Skew-Gaussian random field , 2009, J. Comput. Appl. Math..
[42] Thomas E. Nichols,et al. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.