The effective integration of digital games and learning content

This thesis is concerned with how the coveted user-engagement of digital games can be usefully harnessed for educational goals. Educational software has traditionally used gaming elements as a separate reward for completing learning content. The early "edutainment" sector became synonymous with this cursory "chocolate-covered broccoli" approach (Bruckman, 1999): tagging games on to learning content in order to make it more palatable. However, such methods have often proved ineffective (Kerawalla & Crook, 2005; Trushell, Burrell, & Maitland, 2001) and have been criticised for combining the worst elements of both games and education (Papert, 1998) as well as for following extrinsically motivating design models (Lepper, 1985; Parker & Lepper, 1992). This thesis provides a theoretical and empirical exploration of game designs that follow a more integrated approach. Five studies are described which detail the development and evaluation of a new theory for creating intrinsic integration based on integrating learning content with the game mechanics of a game. This includes the development of Zombie Division: a game that teaches mathematics to children through swordplay with skeletal opponents. Two experimental studies examine the motivational differences between integrated and non-integrated versions of Zombie Division by measuring time-on-task. Two more examine the educational effectiveness of integrated and non-integrated versions by measuring learning gains for a fixed amount of time-on-task. Statistically significant results are found which suggest that the integrated version is motivationally and educationally more effective than the extrinsic equivalent. Full results and implications are discussed.

[1]  E. Thorndike,et al.  The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. (I). , 1901 .

[2]  J. Dewey,et al.  How We Think , 2009 .

[3]  J. Piaget The Psychology Of Intelligence , 1951 .

[4]  C. B. Ferster,et al.  Schedules of reinforcement , 1957 .

[5]  J. Lewis,et al.  NOVELTY, COMPLEXITY, INCONGRUITY, EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION, AND THE GSR. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  R. Decharms Personal causation : the internal affective determinants of behavior , 1968 .

[7]  E. Klinger Structure and functions of fantasy , 1971 .

[8]  E. Deci Effects of Externally Mediated Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation. , 1971 .

[9]  Mark R. Lepper,et al.  Turning play into work: Effects of adult surveillance and extrinsic rewards on children's intrinsic motivation. , 1975 .

[10]  G. Cullingford,et al.  Some experiences with computer based games in civil engineering teaching , 1979 .

[11]  Thomas L. Daniel,et al.  Intrinsic motivation as influenced by rewards, task interest, and task structure. , 1980 .

[12]  John R. Anderson Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[13]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[14]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[16]  E. Loftus,et al.  Mind at Play; The Psychology of Video Games , 1983 .

[17]  G. Selnow Playing Videogames: The Electronic Friend , 1984 .

[18]  Video Arcades, Youth, and Trouble , 1984 .

[19]  Chris Crawford,et al.  The Art of Computer Game Design , 1984 .

[20]  D. Kolko,et al.  Effects of video games on the adverse corollaries of chemotherapy in pediatric oncology patients: a single-case analysis. , 1985, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[21]  J. Hiebert,et al.  Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Mathematics: An Introductory Analysis , 1986 .

[22]  D. Perkins,et al.  Teaching for Transfer. , 1988 .

[23]  D. Wood How Children Think and Learn , 1988 .

[24]  C. Braun,et al.  Arcade Video Games: Proxemic, Cognitive and Content Analyses , 1989 .

[25]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[26]  Karen L. Rasmussen,et al.  Since Malone's Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction: What's the Score in the Gaming Literature? , 1993 .

[27]  David W. Carraher,et al.  Street mathematics and school mathematics , 1993 .

[28]  John D. Bransford,et al.  The transition form theory to therapy: Test of two instructional methods , 1993 .

[29]  Seymour Papert,et al.  The Children's Machine , 1993 .

[30]  S. Deshpande,et al.  Task Characteristics and the Experience of Optimal Flow in Human—Computer Interaction , 1994 .

[31]  M. Griffiths,et al.  The effect of type A personality on physiological arousal while playing computer games. , 1995, Addictive behaviors.

[32]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games , 1996 .

[33]  Peter Bryant,et al.  Children Doing Mathematics , 1996 .

[34]  J. Sandberg,et al.  Deep learning is difficult , 1997 .

[35]  Kamran Sedighian,et al.  Direct Object Manipulation vs Direct Concept Manipulation: Effect of Interface Style on Reflection and Domain Learning , 1997, BCS HCI.

[36]  M. Dadds,et al.  Social Desirability and Self-Reported Anxiety in Children: An Analysis of the RCMAS Lie Scale , 1998, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[37]  D. Wood,et al.  Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[38]  Dave Morris,et al.  Game architecture and design , 1999 .

[39]  Craig S. Miller,et al.  Goals and Learning in Microworlds , 1999 .

[40]  Lynn McAlpine,et al.  Building a metacognitive model of reflection , 1999 .

[41]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[42]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Implications of the ACT-R Learning Theory: No Magic Bullets , 2000 .

[43]  Carlo Fabricatore,et al.  Learning and Videogames: an Unexploited Synergy , 2000 .

[44]  Christine Chin,et al.  Learning in Science: A Comparison of Deep and Surface Approaches. , 2000 .

[45]  John Trushell,et al.  Year 5 pupils reading an "Interactive Storybook" on CD-ROM: losing the plot? , 2001, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[46]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Developing Conceptual Understanding and Procedural Skill in Mathematics: An Iterative Process. , 2001 .

[47]  Mark E. Tubbs,et al.  Direct Reports of Motivation for Task Performance Levels: Some Construct-Related Evidence , 2001, The Journal of psychology.

[48]  Richard N. Van Eck,et al.  The effect of competition and contextualized advisement on the transfer of mathematics skills a computer-based instructional simulation game , 2002 .

[49]  David W. Carraher,et al.  The Transfer Dilemma , 2002 .

[50]  E. Deci,et al.  Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. , 2002 .

[51]  A. McFarlane,et al.  Report on the educational use of games , 2002 .

[52]  Peter Bryant,et al.  Children's understanding and misunderstanding of the inverse relation in division , 2003 .

[53]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  Examining the Unique Effects of Multiple Motivational Sources on Task Performance , 2003 .

[54]  Marc Prensky,et al.  Digital game-based learning , 2000, CIE.

[55]  Ting-Jui Chou,et al.  The Role of Flow Experience in Cyber-Game Addiction , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[56]  P. Bryant,et al.  Children¿s models of division , 2003 .

[57]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  The effects of self‐explaining when learning with text or diagrams , 2003 .

[58]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[59]  Gerardo Prieto,et al.  The effect of item feedback on multiple-choice test responses. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[60]  Katie Salen,et al.  Rules of play: game design fundamentals , 2003 .

[61]  M. Bannert,et al.  Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation , 2003 .

[62]  Theo J. Bastiaens,et al.  The impact of intrinsic motivation on e-learning in authentic computer tasks , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[63]  D. Shaffer Pedagogical Praxis: The Professions as Models for Postindustrial Education , 2004, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[64]  William V. Wright,et al.  A Theory of Fun for Game Design , 2004 .

[65]  John Kirriemuir,et al.  Literature Review in Games and Learning , 2004 .

[66]  K. Squire,et al.  Replaying history: learning world history through playing civilization iii , 2004 .

[67]  James Paul Gee,et al.  Learning by Design: Good Video Games as Learning Machines , 2005 .

[68]  David R. Michael,et al.  Serious Games: Games That Educate, Train, and Inform , 2005 .

[69]  Gareth Schott,et al.  Social Play and Learning , 2005 .

[70]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Physically Distributed Learning: Adapting and Reinterpreting Physical Environments in the Development of Fraction Concepts , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[71]  Robert T Hays,et al.  The Effectiveness of Instructional Games: A Literature Review and Discussion , 2005 .

[72]  Shaaron E. Ainsworth,et al.  Endogenous fantasy and learning in digital games , 2015 .

[73]  Jesper Juul Half-Real: Video Games between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds , 2005 .

[74]  Regina Vollmeyer,et al.  A Surprising Effect of Feedback on Learning. , 2005 .

[75]  R. Mayer,et al.  Role of guidance, reflection, and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game , 2005 .

[76]  R. Siegler,et al.  What leads children to adopt new strategies? A microgenetic/cross-sectional study of class inclusion. , 2006, Child development.

[77]  J. Gee,et al.  How Computer Games Help Children Learn , 2006 .

[78]  Julie I. Cohen,et al.  Effect of action video games on the spatial distribution of visuospatial attention. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[79]  Mark H. Overmars,et al.  The game maker's apprentice - game development for beginners , 2006 .

[80]  Nico Verloop,et al.  The Portfolio as a Tool for Stimulating Reflection by Student Teachers. , 2007 .

[81]  Kamran Sedig,et al.  Toward operationalization of 'flow' in mathematics learnware , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..