On integer programming models for the multi-channel PMU placement problem and their solution

Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) are starting to see increased deployment, enabling accurate measurement of power grid electrical properties to determine system health. Due to the costs associated with PMU acquisition and maintenance, it is practically important to place the minimum number of PMUs in order to achieve system complete observability. In this paper, we consider a variety of optimization models for the PMU placement problem that addresses more realistic assumptions than simple infinite-capacity placement models. Specifically, instead of assuming that a PMU can sense all lines incident to the bus at which it is placed, we impose the more realistic assumption that PMUs have restricted channel capacity, with per-unit cost given as a function of channel capacity. The optimization objective is then to minimize the total cost of placed PMUs, in contrast to their number. Further, we leverage the zero-injection bus properties to reduce the quantity and cost of placed PMUs. In formulating our optimization models, we identify a close relationship between the PMU placement problem (PPP) and a classic combinatorial problem, the set cover problem (SCP). If channel capacity limits are ignored, there is a close relationship between the PPP and the dominating set problem (DSP), a special case of the SCP. Similarly, when measurement redundancy is imposed as a design requirement, there is a close relationship between the PPP and the set multi-cover problem (SMCP), a generalized version of the SCP. These connections to well-studied combinational problems are not well-known in the power systems literature, and can be leveraged to improve solution algorithms. We demonstrate that more realistic, high-fidelity PPP optimization models can be solved to optimality using commercial integer programing solvers such as CPLEX. Specifically, run-times for all test cases, ranging from IEEE 14-bus to 300-bus test systems, are less than a second. This result indicates that the size of system that can be analyzed using state-of-the-art solvers is considerable. Further, our results call into question the need for problem-specific heuristic solution algorithms for the PPP, many of which have been proposed over the past decade. Finally, we analyze cost versus performance tradeoffs using our PPP optimization models on various IEEE test systems.

[1]  Elham B. Makram,et al.  Optimal PMU placement considering number of analog channels , 2011, 2011 North American Power Symposium.

[2]  Ali Abur,et al.  Impact of network sparsity on strategic placement of phasor measurement units with fixed channel capacity , 2010, Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[3]  Ali T. Alouani,et al.  Optimal PMU placement algorithm with minimum measurement channels , 2011, 2011 Proceedings of IEEE Southeastcon.

[4]  Piotr Berman,et al.  Randomized approximation algorithms for set multicover problems with applications to reverse engineering of protein and gene networks , 2007, Discret. Appl. Math..

[5]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[6]  Piotr Berman,et al.  Randomized approximation algorithms for set multicover problems with applications to reverse engineering of protein and gene networks , 2004, Discret. Appl. Math..

[7]  Vittal S. Rao,et al.  Optimal placement of PMUs with limited number of channels , 2011, 2011 North American Power Symposium.

[8]  Richard M. Karp,et al.  Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems , 1972, 50 Years of Integer Programming.

[10]  Roozbeh Emami,et al.  Enhancement of Network Monitoring & Security Analysis Using Phasor Measurement Units , 2011 .

[11]  P. Praks,et al.  Measurement placement algorithms for state estimation when the number of phasor measurements by each PMU is limited , 2008, 2008 43rd International Universities Power Engineering Conference.

[12]  Ali Abur,et al.  Placement of PMUs with channel limits , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[13]  Lenwood S. Heath,et al.  The PMU Placement Problem , 2005, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[14]  A. Abur,et al.  Observability analysis and measurement placement for systems with PMUs , 2004, IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition, 2004..

[15]  B. Gou,et al.  Generalized Integer Linear Programming Formulation for Optimal PMU Placement , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  Stephen A. Cook,et al.  The complexity of theorem-proving procedures , 1971, STOC.

[17]  Vijay V. Vazirani,et al.  Approximation Algorithms , 2001, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[18]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[19]  Farrokh Aminifar,et al.  Impact of WAMS Malfunction on Power System Reliability Assessment , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[20]  M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad,et al.  Optimal PMU Placement Based on Probabilistic Cost/Benefit Analysis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  A. Abur,et al.  Robust Measurement Design by Placing Synchronized Phasor Measurements on Network Branches , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[22]  Mert Korkali Strategic and Robust Deployment of Synchronized Phasor Measurement Units with Restricted Channel Capacity , 2010 .

[23]  Demetrios G. Eliades,et al.  Placement of Synchronized Measurements for Power System Observability , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[24]  S.A. Soman,et al.  Optimal Multistage Scheduling of PMU Placement: An ILP Approach , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[25]  Farrokh Aminifar,et al.  Observability of Hybrid AC/DC Power Systems With Variable-Cost PMUs , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[26]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Contingency-Constrained PMU Placement in Power Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[27]  Igor Djurovic,et al.  Optimal placement of PMUs with limited number of channels , 2012 .

[28]  M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad,et al.  Observability enhancement by optimal PMU placement considering random power system outages , 2011 .

[29]  Michael A. Henning,et al.  Domination in Graphs Applied to Electric Power Networks , 2002, SIAM J. Discret. Math..