Intersubject similarity in neural representations underlies shared episodic memory content.

Individuals generally form their unique memories from shared experiences, yet the neural representational mechanisms underlying this subjectiveness of memory are poorly understood. The current study addressed this important question from the cross-subject neural representational perspective, leveraging a large functional magnetic resonance imaging dataset (n = 415) of a face-name associative memory task. We found that individuals' memory abilities were predicted by their synchronization to the group-averaged, canonical trial-by-trial activation level and, to a lesser degree, by their similarity to the group-averaged representational patterns during encoding. More importantly, the memory content shared between pairs of participants could be predicted by their shared local neural activation pattern, particularly in the angular gyrus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex, even after controlling for differences in memory abilities. These results uncover neural representational mechanisms for individualized memory and underscore the constructive nature of episodic memory.

[1]  G. Xue From remembering to reconstruction: The transformative neural representation of episodic memory , 2022, Progress in Neurobiology.

[2]  Junjiao Feng,et al.  Higher-dimensional neural representations predict better episodic memory , 2022, Science advances.

[3]  N. Axmacher,et al.  Transformative neural representations support long-term episodic memory , 2021, Science advances.

[4]  J. Koen Age-related neural dedifferentiation for individual stimuli: An across-participant pattern similarity analysis , 2021, bioRxiv.

[5]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Systems consolidation, transformation and reorganization: Multiple Trace Theory, Trace Transformation Theory and their Competitors , 2021 .

[6]  Brice A. Kuhl,et al.  Transforming the Concept of Memory Reactivation , 2020, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  Luke J. Chang,et al.  Movie viewing elicits rich and reliable brain state dynamics , 2020, Nature Communications.

[8]  A. Maril,et al.  Prior knowledge promotes hippocampal separation but cortical assimilation in the left inferior frontal gyrus , 2020, Nature Communications.

[9]  E. Finn,et al.  Neural signatures of attentional engagement during narratives and its consequences for event memory , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Melina R. Uncapher,et al.  Memory failure predicted by attention lapsing and media multitasking , 2020, Nature.

[11]  L. Yao,et al.  Individual-specific and shared representations during episodic memory encoding and retrieval , 2020, NeuroImage.

[12]  Anqi Li,et al.  Retrieval practice facilitates memory updating by enhancing and differentiating medial prefrontal cortex representations , 2020, eLife.

[13]  Griffin E. Koch,et al.  Neural Patterns are More Similar across Individuals during Successful Memory Encoding than during Failed Memory Encoding. , 2020, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Valerie A. Carr,et al.  Hippocampal and cortical mechanisms at retrieval explain variability in episodic remembering in older adults , 2020, bioRxiv.

[15]  Kylie H. Alm,et al.  Medial temporal lobe white matter pathway variability is associated with individual differences in episodic memory in cognitively normal older adults , 2019, Neurobiology of Aging.

[16]  Peter J. Molfese,et al.  Idiosynchrony: From shared responses to individual differences during naturalistic neuroimaging , 2019, NeuroImage.

[17]  Samuel A. Nastase,et al.  Measuring shared responses across subjects using intersubject correlation , 2019, bioRxiv.

[18]  Gui Xue,et al.  Multiple interactive memory representations underlie the induction of false memory , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Luke J. Chang,et al.  Endogenous variation in ventromedial prefrontal cortex state dynamics during naturalistic viewing reflects affective experience , 2018, Science Advances.

[20]  G. Xue,et al.  Reduced Fidelity of Neural Representation Underlies Episodic Memory Decline in Normal Aging , 2018, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  Gui Xue,et al.  The Neural Representations Underlying Human Episodic Memory , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Inferior parietal lobule and early visual areas support elicitation of individualized meanings during narrative listening , 2018, bioRxiv.

[23]  Nicholas B. Turk-Browne,et al.  Forgetting from lapses of sustained attention , 2018, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Brice A. Kuhl,et al.  Parietal Representations of Stimulus Features Are Amplified during Memory Retrieval and Flexibly Aligned with Top-Down Goals , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Garvin Brod,et al.  Specifying the role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in memory formation , 2018, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  Asaf Gilboa,et al.  Neurobiology of Schemas and Schema-Mediated Memory , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Local-Global Parcellation of the Human Cerebral Cortex From Intrinsic Functional Connectivity MRI , 2017, bioRxiv.

[28]  Gui Xue,et al.  Transformed Neural Pattern Reinstatement during Episodic Memory Retrieval , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Yuan Chang Leong,et al.  Shared memories reveal shared structure in neural activity across individuals , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  L. Parra,et al.  Memorable Audiovisual Narratives Synchronize Sensory and Supramodal Neural Responses , 2016, eNeuro.

[31]  Nicolas W. Schuck,et al.  Human Orbitofrontal Cortex Represents a Cognitive Map of State Space , 2016, Neuron.

[32]  Demis Hassabis,et al.  Semantic representations in the temporal pole predict false memories , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Reliability of dissimilarity measures for multi-voxel pattern analysis , 2016, NeuroImage.

[34]  Janice Chen,et al.  Dynamic reconfiguration of the default mode network during narrative comprehension , 2016, Nature Communications.

[35]  Gui Xue,et al.  Neural Global Pattern Similarity Underlies True and False Memories , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Luke J. Chang,et al.  Large-Scale Meta-Analysis of Human Medial Frontal Cortex Reveals Tripartite Functional Organization , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Jason J. Ki,et al.  Attention Strongly Modulates Reliability of Neural Responses to Naturalistic Narrative Stimuli , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Su Keun Jeong,et al.  Behaviorally Relevant Abstract Object Identity Representation in the Human Parietal Cortex , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  G. Xue,et al.  Spatiotemporal Neural Pattern Similarity Supports Episodic Memory , 2015, Current Biology.

[40]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Synchronous brain activity across individuals underlies shared psychological perspectives , 2014, NeuroImage.

[41]  John S. Johnson,et al.  Audience preferences are predicted by temporal reliability of neural processing , 2014, Nature Communications.

[42]  Brice A. Kuhl,et al.  Successful Remembering Elicits Event-Specific Activity Patterns in Lateral Parietal Cortex , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  J. Gee,et al.  The Insight ToolKit image registration framework , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[44]  Yong He,et al.  BrainNet Viewer: A Network Visualization Tool for Human Brain Connectomics , 2013, PloS one.

[45]  J. Mumford,et al.  Complementary role of frontoparietal activity and cortical pattern similarity in successful episodic memory encoding. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  Jukka-Pekka Kauppi,et al.  Inter-Subject Correlation in fMRI: Method Validation against Stimulus-Model Based Analysis , 2012, PloS one.

[47]  R. Hari,et al.  Emotions promote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Deconvolving BOLD activation in event-related designs for multivoxel pattern classification analyses , 2012, NeuroImage.

[49]  Hongkeun Kim,et al.  Neural activity that predicts subsequent memory and forgetting: A meta-analysis of 74 fMRI studies , 2011, NeuroImage.

[50]  J. Mumford,et al.  Greater Neural Pattern Similarity Across Repetitions Is Associated with Better Memory , 2010, Science.

[51]  E. Loftus,et al.  Title Individual differences in false memory from misinformation : Cognitive factors Permalink , 2015 .

[52]  D. Heeger,et al.  Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[53]  Scott T Grafton,et al.  Medial temporal lobe BOLD activity at rest predicts individual differences in memory ability in healthy young adults , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  L. Davachi,et al.  Enhanced Intersubject Correlations during Movie Viewing Correlate with Successful Episodic Encoding , 2008, Neuron.

[55]  Vince D Calhoun,et al.  Interparticipant correlations: A model free FMRI analysis technique , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[56]  R. Buckner,et al.  Functional-Anatomic Correlates of Individual Differences in Memory , 2006, Neuron.

[57]  R. Malach,et al.  Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity During Natural Vision , 2004, Science.

[58]  A. Dale,et al.  Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. , 1998, Science.

[59]  P. Legendre Numerical Ecology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Ecology.

[60]  Tamara Vanderwal,et al.  Shared understanding of narratives is correlated with shared neural responses , 2019, NeuroImage.

[61]  M. Greicius,et al.  Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[62]  P. Legendre,et al.  vegan : Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.8-5 , 2007 .

[63]  L. Schoer,et al.  Individual differences in memory. , 1959 .