Passivity of Interconnected Asynchronous Discrete-Time Systems

This paper presents a constructive algorithm to design local controllers for feedback systems that are interconnected via time-varying and asynchronous sampling. These systems result in many application fields such as remotely-operated systems, interconnected vehicle control loops, and more generally in component-based control design where synchronous exchange of information is not feasible. The design is based on the (MASP) MAximum Sampling time preserving Passivity, and uses discrete-time passivity considerations. The paper first explores several ways to compute the MASP for linear systems, and then proposes a numerical algorithm to compute local feedback loops providing a MASP compatible with the maximum sampling-time upperbound of each sub-system. This results in a exponentially stable interconnection. The paper also presents a simulation example of this design.

[1]  Eva M. Navarro-López,et al.  Several dissipativity and passivity implications in the linear discrete-time setting , 2005 .

[2]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Future directions in control in an information-rich world , 2003 .

[3]  H. Marquez Nonlinear Control Systems: Analysis and Design , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[4]  Christopher I. Byrnes,et al.  Directions in Mathematical Systems : Theory and Optimization , 2003 .

[5]  Mituhiko Araki,et al.  Recent Developments in Digital Control Theory , 1993 .

[6]  F. M. Callier,et al.  Dissipative Systems Analysis and Control: Theory and Applications (2nd Edition)-[Book review; B. Brogliato, R. Lozano, B. Maschke] , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[7]  Johan Nilsson,et al.  LQG control over a Markov communication network , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[8]  Bernhard Maschke,et al.  Dissipative Systems Analysis and Control , 2000 .

[9]  David Robert Contribution à l'interaction commande/ordonnancement , 2007 .

[10]  Gerhard Fohler,et al.  A discrete-time controller design method to tolerate non-equidistant sampling and actuation , 2002 .

[11]  R. Rohrer,et al.  Passivity considerations in stability studies of numerical integration algorithms , 1981 .

[12]  Dragan Nesic,et al.  Open- and Closed-Loop Dissipation Inequalities Under Sampling and Controller Emulation , 2002, Eur. J. Control.

[13]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Bilateral teleoperation: An historical survey , 2006, Autom..

[14]  Laurent El Ghaoui,et al.  Advances in linear matrix inequality methods in control: advances in design and control , 1999 .

[15]  B. Brogliato,et al.  Dissipative Systems Analysis and Control , 2000 .

[16]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Control of asynchronous dynamical systems with rate constraints on events , 1999, Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.99CH36304).