Morphing Robots Using Robotic Skins That Sculpt Clay

Shape versatility is a mechanism that many animals leverage to effectively interact-with and locomote-within the natural world. Toward the goal of shape-changing artificial systems, we present morphing robots comprised of robotic skins and sculptable materials. Herein, we describe robotic skins—planar, skin-like substrates with embedded actuation—that are wrapped around sculptable materials in order to actively shape those materials into different forms. Our approach is inspired by the art of sculpture, where surface strains and pressures applied by hand allow clay to be sculpted into nearly any desired shape. Replacing hands with robotic skins, we achieve morphing capabilities in a robotic system. We focus on an example robot in which two robotic skins are layered on a base sculptable material to induce both locomotion and morphing behaviors, and show that morphing enables the robot to overcome obstacles during locomotion. This letter is the first instantiation of morphing robots based on sculpture-inspired surface manipulation of sculptable materials, where shape-changing capabilities are expected to improve robot adaptability to meet the demands of changing environments, overcome obstacles, or perform variable tasks.

[1]  D. Rus,et al.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots , 2015, Nature.

[2]  Shenbaga R. Kaniraj,et al.  Compressive strength of cement stabilized fly ash-soil mixtures , 1999 .

[3]  Matteo Cianchetti,et al.  Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities , 2016, Science Robotics.

[4]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Soft robotics for chemists. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[5]  Dirk Lefeber,et al.  Pneumatic artificial muscles: Actuators for robotics and automation , 2002 .

[6]  Matthew A. Robertson,et al.  New soft robots really suck: Vacuum-powered systems empower diverse capabilities , 2017, Science Robotics.

[7]  Rebecca Kramer-Bottiglio,et al.  An addressable pneumatic regulator for distributed control of soft robots , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft).

[8]  Oliver Brock,et al.  Selective stiffening of soft actuators based on jamming , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[9]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[10]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  A Resilient, Untethered Soft Robot , 2014 .

[11]  Josh C. Bongard,et al.  How morphological development can guide evolution , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Multigait soft robot , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Stephen A. Morin,et al.  Using “Click‐e‐Bricks” to Make 3D Elastomeric Structures , 2014, Advanced materials.

[14]  Auke Jan Ijspeert,et al.  Towards dynamic trot gait locomotion: Design, control, and experiments with Cheetah-cub, a compliant quadruped robot , 2013, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[15]  Sung-Sik Park,et al.  Effect of fiber reinforcement and distribution on unconfined compressive strength of fiber-reinforced cemented sand , 2009 .

[16]  Stephen A. Morin,et al.  Magnetic Assembly of Soft Robots with Hard Components , 2013 .

[17]  Michelle C. Yuen,et al.  OmniSkins: Robotic skins that turn inanimate objects into multifunctional robots , 2018, Science Robotics.

[18]  Michael Levin,et al.  Limbform: a functional ontology-based database of limb regeneration experiments , 2014, Bioinform..

[19]  Heinrich M. Jaeger,et al.  JSEL: Jamming Skin Enabled Locomotion , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[20]  Chen Ji,et al.  A Reconfigurable Omnidirectional Soft Robot Based on Caterpillar Locomotion. , 2018, Soft robotics.