The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain.

Contingencies between objects and people can be mechanical or intentional-social in nature. In this fMRI study we used simplified stimuli to investigate brain regions involved in the detection of mechanical and intentional contingencies. Using a factorial design we manipulated the 'animacy' and 'contingency' of stimulus movement, and the subject's attention to the contingencies. The detection of mechanical contingency between shapes whose movement was inanimate engaged the middle temporal gyrus and right intraparietal sulcus. The detection of intentional contingency between shapes whose movement was animate activated superior parietal networks bilaterally. These activations were unaffected by attention to contingency. Additional regions, the right middle frontal gyrus and left superior temporal sulcus, became activated by the animate-contingent stimuli when subjects specifically attended to the contingent nature of the stimuli. Our results help to clarify neural networks previously associated with 'theory of mind' and agency detection. In particular, the results suggest that low-level perception of agency in terms of objects reacting to other objects at a distance is processed by parietal networks. In contrast, the activation of brain regions traditionally associated with theory of mind tasks appears to require attention to be directed towards agency and contingency.

[1]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[2]  A. Michotte,et al.  La perception de la causalite , 1956 .

[3]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[4]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ? , 1985, Cognition.

[5]  A. Leslie,et al.  Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? , 1987, Cognition.

[6]  D. Premack The infant's theory of self-propelled objects , 1990, Cognition.

[7]  L. Cohen,et al.  Infant perception of a causal event , 1990 .

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  D. Shanks,et al.  Evidence for a Distinction between Judged and Perceived Causality , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[10]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A PET study of visuospatial attention , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[12]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension , 1995, Cognition.

[13]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction , 1995, Science.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[15]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? , 1996, Nature.

[16]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  C. Frith,et al.  Interacting minds--a biological basis. , 1999, Science.

[18]  H. Brownell,et al.  Acquired `theory of mind' impairments following stroke , 1999, Cognition.

[19]  C. Frith,et al.  Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns , 2000, NeuroImage.

[20]  G. Glover,et al.  Analysis of a distributed neural system involved in spatial information, novelty, and memory processing , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[21]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perception of Animacy from the Motion of a Single Object , 2000, Perception.

[23]  J. Decety,et al.  A PET Investigation of the Attribution of Intentions with a Nonverbal Task , 2000, NeuroImage.

[24]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  C. Frith,et al.  Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  M Corbetta,et al.  Multiple neural correlates of detection in the human brain. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  J. Decety,et al.  From the perception of action to the understanding of intention , 2001, Nature reviews. Neuroscience.

[28]  K. Zilles,et al.  Mind Reading: Neural Mechanisms of Theory of Mind and Self-Perspective , 2001, NeuroImage.

[29]  U. Frith Mind Blindness and the Brain in Autism , 2001, Neuron.

[30]  Pascal Boyer,et al.  How the brain perceives causality: an event-related fMRI study , 2001, Neuroreport.

[31]  C. Koch,et al.  Brain Areas Specific for Attentional Load in a Motion-Tracking Task , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Ivanei E. Bramati,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Moral Sensitivity: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Basic and Moral Emotions , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Christopher D. Frith,et al.  Imaging the Intentional Stance in a Competitive Game , 2002, NeuroImage.