Design and validation of a centimeter-scale robot collective

Though many advances have been made in the field of multi-agent robotic swarms, most results are limited to computer simulations instead of actual implantation to a robotic system. A primary factor limiting the development, testing, and validation of decentralized algorithms for large-scale multi-robot teams is the high cost of the available systems. A low budget but highly flexible platform could create a foundation that would allow researchers to evaluate their control algorithms under real world constraints. This paper presents Spider-Bots, a low cost and versatile platform for testing and validating control algorithms for multi-robot swarms. The system is consisted of centimeter-scale mobile robots that can communicate wirelessly and interact with their environment, along with simple and easy to use software libraries. Once completed, the platform was validated by executing three distinct algorithms: Waypoint navigation, object manipulation, and collision avoidance.

[1]  Ilya Kolmanovsky,et al.  Developments in Nonholonomic . . . , 1995 .

[2]  Kristofer S. J. Pister,et al.  CotsBots: an off-the-shelf platform for distributed robotics , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[3]  Myung Hwangbo,et al.  A stable target-tracking control for unicycle mobile robots , 2000, Proceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000) (Cat. No.00CH37113).

[4]  Tom Lauwers,et al.  Designing the Finch: Creating a Robot Aligned to Computer Science Concepts , 2010, AAAI 2010.

[5]  Serge Kernbach,et al.  Swarmrobot.org - Open-hardware Microrobotic Project for Large-scale Artificial Swarms , 2011, ArXiv.

[6]  Alexander Bahr,et al.  Indoor navigation research with the Khepera III mobile robot: An experimental baseline with a case-study on ultra-wideband positioning , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation.

[7]  Ilya Kolmanovsky,et al.  Developments in nonholonomic control problems , 1995 .

[8]  Fumio Miyazaki,et al.  A stable tracking control method for an autonomous mobile robot , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Ansgar Traechtler,et al.  Cooperative Transportation of Aload Using Nonholonomic Mobile Robots , 2012 .

[10]  Nikolaus Correll,et al.  Ad-hoc wireless network coverage with networked robots that cannot localize , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Robomote: enabling mobility in sensor networks , 2005, IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005..

[12]  Cam Hong Tran,et al.  EDUCATIONAL ROBOTICS: A CASE STUDY WITH THE PARALLAX SCRIBBLER ROBOT AS A BOT-MATE , 2010 .

[13]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  Mobile micro-robots ready to use: Alice , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[14]  Radhika Nagpal,et al.  Kilobot: A low cost scalable robot system for collective behaviors , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  James K. Kuchar,et al.  A review of conflict detection and resolution modeling methods , 2000, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[16]  Andrew J. Lynch Multi-robot behaviors with bearing-only sensors and scale-free coordinates , 2011 .

[17]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Open E-puck Range & Bearing miniaturized board for local communication in swarm robotics , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.