Perceiving what you intend to do from what you do: evidence for embodiment in social interactions

Although action and perception are central components of our interactions with the external world, the most recent experimental investigations also support their implications in the emotional, decision-making, and goal ascription processes in social context. In this article, we review the existing literature supporting this view and highlighting a link between reach-to-grasp motor actions and social communicative processes. First, we discuss the most recent experimental findings showing how the social context subtly influences the execution of object-oriented motor actions. Then, we show that the kinematic characteristics of object-oriented motor actions are modulated by the actor's social intention. Finally, we demonstrate that naïve observers can implicitly take advantage of these kinematic effects for their own motor productions. Considered together, these data are compatible with the embodied cognition framework stating that cognition, and in our case social cognition, is grounded in knowledge associated with past sensory and motor experiences.

[1]  J. Braithwaite,et al.  Seeing it their way: evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Leif Johannsen,et al.  Tool use without a tool: kinematic characteristics of pantomiming as compared to actual use and the effect of brain damage , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  B. Rimé,et al.  The perception of interpersonal emotions originated by patterns of movement , 1985 .

[4]  Brian Richards,et al.  The Role of Imitation , 1986 .

[5]  Phil McAleer,et al.  Understanding intention from minimal displays of human activity , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[6]  U. Castiello,et al.  Different action patterns for cooperative and competitive behaviour , 2007, Cognition.

[7]  W. Prinz,et al.  Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[8]  P. Jacob Embodied cognition, communication and the language faculty , 2012 .

[9]  Michael J. Wiemers,et al.  Interplay Between Action and Movement Intentions During Social Interaction , 2012, Psychological science.

[10]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[11]  Philippe Gaussier,et al.  Reading motor intention through mental imagery , 2013, Adapt. Behav..

[12]  R. Ellis,et al.  I don't get you. Action observation effects inverted by kinematic variation. , 2015, Acta psychologica.

[13]  J. Shah,et al.  The motivational looking glass: how significant others implicitly affect goal appraisals. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  H. Heffner,et al.  The Evolution of Human , 2004 .

[15]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Marcel Brass,et al.  What is matched in direct matching? Intention attribution modulates motor priming. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Roland S Johansson,et al.  Eye movements when observing predictable and unpredictable actions. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  The motor theory of social cognition: a critique , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  S. Runeson,et al.  Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expe , 1983 .

[20]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. , 1987 .

[21]  W. Prinz,et al.  Representing others' actions: just like one's own? , 2003, Cognition.

[22]  Dana Samson,et al.  Executive function is necessary for perspective selection, not Level-1 visual perspective calculation: Evidence from a dual-task study of adults , 2010, Cognition.

[23]  S. Gallagher Direct perception in the intersubjective context , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[24]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perception of Animacy from the Motion of a Single Object , 2000, Perception.

[25]  R. Morris,et al.  Inferred goals in narratives: evidence from self-paced reading, recall, and eye movements. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  The eye contact effect: mechanisms and development , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  V. Bruce,et al.  Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  B. Tversky,et al.  Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking , 2009, Cognition.

[29]  P. Haggard,et al.  Action observation and execution: What is shared? , 2008, Social neuroscience.

[30]  G. Gredebäck,et al.  Humans Anticipate the Goal of other People’s Point-Light Actions , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[31]  Mark G. Grotefend The Perception Is... , 2009 .

[32]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[33]  R. Hari,et al.  Brain basis of human social interaction: from concepts to brain imaging. , 2009, Physiological reviews.

[34]  Daniel Lewkowicz,et al.  Effects of social intention on movement kinematics in cooperative actions , 2013, Front. Neurorobot..

[35]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  How the gaze of others influences object processing , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  J. M. Golding,et al.  Superordinate goal inferences: Are they automatically generated during comprehension? , 1993 .

[37]  A. Meltzoff Understanding the Intentions of Others: Re-Enactment of Intended Acts by 18-Month-Old Children. , 1995, Developmental psychology.

[38]  J Decety,et al.  Is perceptual anticipation a motor simulation? A PET study , 2001, Neuroreport.

[39]  D. Patel,et al.  Inferring subjective states through the observation of actions , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  H. Bekkering,et al.  The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  U. Castiello,et al.  Toward You , 2010 .

[42]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[43]  Jonathan D. Nelson,et al.  Human cortical representations for reaching: Mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery , 2007, NeuroImage.

[44]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[45]  Darren Newtson,et al.  The objective basis of behavior units. , 1977 .

[46]  N. George,et al.  Facing the gaze of others , 2008, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[47]  Y. Coello,et al.  For your eyes only: effect of confederate’s eye level on reach-to-grasp action , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[48]  Ran R. Hassin,et al.  Goal contagion: perceiving is for pursuing. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  Ran R. Hassin,et al.  Automatic goal inferences. , 2005 .

[50]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  M. Costantini,et al.  Grasping with the eyes. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  U. Castiello,et al.  The case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: A kinematic study on social intention , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[53]  C. Frith Social cognition , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  S. Gallagher,et al.  Social Constraints on the Direct Perception of Emotions and Intentions , 2014 .

[55]  U. Castiello,et al.  Both your intention and mine are reflected in the kinematics of my reach-to-grasp movement , 2008, Cognition.

[56]  U. Castiello,et al.  Cues to intention: The role of movement information , 2011, Cognition.

[57]  Gráinne M. Fitzsimons,et al.  Thinking of you: nonconscious pursuit of interpersonal goals associated with relationship partners. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[58]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  Joint-action coordination in transferring objects , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[59]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Gaze Direction and Request Gesture in Social Interactions , 2012, PloS one.

[60]  R. Kenny,et al.  Does that look heavy to you? Perceived weight judgment in lifting actions in younger and older adults , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[61]  V. Manera,et al.  Cooperation or competition? Discriminating between social intentions by observing prehensile movements , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[62]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Mirroring as Pattern Completion Inferences within Situated Conceptualizations , 2013, Cortex.

[63]  G. Holton Sociobiology: the new synthesis? , 1977, Newsletter on science, technology & human values.

[64]  Claudia Gianelli,et al.  Acting in perspective: the role of body and language as social tools , 2013, Psychological research.

[65]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Descriptions of Simple Spatial Scenes in English and Japanese , 2003, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[66]  V. Gallese The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: the quest for a common mechanism. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[67]  Z. Nadasdy,et al.  Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age , 1995, Cognition.

[68]  R. Johansson,et al.  Action plans used in action observation , 2003, Nature.

[69]  L. Barsalou Situated simulation in the human conceptual system , 2003 .

[70]  A. Goldman,et al.  Is social cognition embodied? , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[71]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by the social dimension of observed actions , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[72]  Joachim Hermsdörfer,et al.  Spatial and kinematic features of apraxic movement depend on the mode of execution , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[73]  Tina Iachini,et al.  Flanker interference effects in a line bisection task , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[74]  L. Schilbach A second-person approach to other minds , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[75]  Visual Perception of Writing and Pointing Movements , 2005, Perception.

[76]  U. Castiello,et al.  From simulation to reciprocity: The case of complementary actions , 2012, Social neuroscience.

[77]  M. Argyle,et al.  Gaze and Mutual Gaze , 1994, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[78]  C. Becchio,et al.  The visible face of intention: why kinematics matters , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[79]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[80]  C. Moore,et al.  Intentional relations and social understanding , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[81]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  I Reach Faster When I See You Look: Gaze Effects in Human–Human and Human–Robot Face-to-Face Cooperation , 2012, Front. Neurorobot..

[82]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Communication via Pointing , 2011, PloS one.

[83]  U. Castiello,et al.  Does the intention to communicate affect action kinematics? , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[84]  Ian A Apperly,et al.  Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? , 2009, Psychological review.

[85]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Type of gesture, valence, and gaze modulate the influence of gestures on observer's behaviors , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[86]  Markus Paulus Action mirroring and action understanding: an ideomotor and attentional account , 2012, Psychological research.

[87]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  The Second-Agent Effect: Communicative Gestures Increase the Likelihood of Perceiving a Second Agent , 2011, PloS one.

[88]  Laurent Cleret de Langavant,et al.  Viewing another person's body as a target object: A behavioural and PET study of pointing , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[89]  C. Kleinke Gaze and eye contact: a research review. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[90]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Social Requests and Social Affordances: How They Affect the Kinematics of Motor Sequences during Interactions between Conspecifics , 2011, PloS one.

[91]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  When emulation becomes reciprocity. , 2013, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[92]  The Amazing Capacity to Read Intentions from Movement Kinematics , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..