Optimal Relation Between Quantization Precision and Sampling Rates

In this chapter, the problem of the control over limited bandwidth communication channels is addressed. A finely grained model is adopted. Such a model ensures the respect of the bandwidth constraints and allows the influence characterization of update frequency and quantization precision on the control performance. A simple static strategy is first proposed, and its (W,V)-stability properties are studied. An efficient approach for the improvement of disturbance rejection capabilities and steady state precision are then proposed. This approach dynamically assigns the quantization precision of the control signals in order to improve the control performance by taking into account the communication and computation requirements of the introduced dynamic protocol. It naturally allows handling linear time invariant systems (LTI) with multiple inputs. Sufficient conditions for ensuring the practical stability of this approach are stated. Finally, the proposed approach is evaluated and illustrated through a numerical example.

[1]  Sandro Zampieri,et al.  Quantized stabilization of linear systems: complexity versus performance , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[2]  Graham C. Goodwin,et al.  A moving horizon approach to Networked Control system design , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[3]  Sekhar Tatikonda,et al.  Control under communication constraints , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[4]  David Q. Mayne,et al.  Invariant approximations of the minimal robust positively Invariant set , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[5]  Franco Blanchini,et al.  Set invariance in control , 1999, Autom..

[6]  Nicola Elia,et al.  Stabilization of linear systems with limited information , 2001, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[7]  Claudio De Persis,et al.  Stability of quantized time-delay nonlinear systems: a Lyapunov–Krasowskii-functional approach , 2008, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.

[8]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Delay compensation in packet-switching networked controlled systems , 2008, 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[9]  Daniel Liberzon,et al.  Quantized feedback stabilization of linear systems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[10]  Yskandar Hamam,et al.  Optimal integrated control and scheduling of networked control systems with communication constraints: application to a car suspension system , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[11]  Dragan Nesic,et al.  A Unified Framework for Design and Analysis of Networked and Quantized Control Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[12]  Arben Çela,et al.  Trading quantization precision for update rates for systems with limited communication in the uplink channel , 2010, Autom..

[13]  D. Delchamps Stabilizing a linear system with quantized state feedback , 1990 .

[14]  W. Brockett,et al.  Minimum attention control , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[15]  R. Brockett,et al.  Systems with finite communication bandwidth constraints. I. State estimation problems , 1997, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[16]  Wing Shing Wong,et al.  Systems with finite communication bandwidth constraints. II. Stabilization with limited information feedback , 1999, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[17]  Koji Tsumura,et al.  Tradeoffs between quantization and packet loss in networked control of linear systems , 2009, Autom..

[18]  R. Evans,et al.  Stabilization with data-rate-limited feedback: tightest attainable bounds , 2000 .

[19]  E. Gilbert,et al.  Theory and computation of disturbance invariant sets for discrete-time linear systems , 1998 .

[20]  Alberto Bemporad,et al.  Control of systems integrating logic, dynamics, and constraints , 1999, Autom..

[21]  Roger W. Brockett,et al.  Stabilization of motor networks , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[22]  Max Donath,et al.  American Control Conference , 1993 .

[23]  Antoine Chaillet,et al.  Quantised control of nonlinear systems: analysis of robustness to parameter uncertainty, measurement errors, and exogenous disturbances , 2010, Int. J. Control.

[24]  Mohamed El Mongi Ben Gaid,et al.  Optimal scheduling of control tasks with state feedback resource allocation , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.