Analyzing EEG signals to detect unexpected obstacles during walking

BackgroundWhen an unexpected perturbation in the environment occurs, the subsequent alertness state may cause a brain activation responding to that perturbation which can be detected and employed by a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI). In this work, the possibility of detecting a sudden obstacle appearance analyzing electroencephalographic (EEG) signals is assessed. For this purpose, different features of EEG signals are evaluated during the appearance of sudden obstacles while a subject is walking on a treadmill. The future goal is to use this procedure to detect any obstacle appearance during walking when the user is wearing a lower limb exoskeleton in order to generate an emergency stop command for the exoskeleton. This would enhance the user-exoskeleton interaction, improving the safety mechanisms of current exoskeletons.MethodsIn order to detect the change in the brain activity when an obstacle suddenly appears, different features of EEG signals are evaluated using the recordings of five healthy subjects. Since the change in the brain activity occurs in the time domain, the features evaluated are: common spatial patterns, average power, slope, and the coefficients of a polynomial fit. A Linear Discriminant Analysis-based classifier is used to differentiate between two conditions: the appearance or not of an obstacle. The evaluation of the performance to detect the obstacles is made in terms of accuracy, true positive (TP) and false positive (FP) rates.ResultsFrom the offline analysis, the best performance is achieved when the slope or the polynomial coefficients are used as features, with average detection accuracy rates of 74.0 and 79.5 %, respectively. These results are consistent with the pseudo-online results, where a complete EEG recording is segmented into windows of 500 ms and overlapped 400 ms, and a decision about the obstacle appearance is made for each window. The results of the best subject were 11 out of 14 obstacles detected with a rate of 9.09 FPs/min, and 10 out of 14 obstacles detected with a rate of 6.34 FPs/min using slope and polynomial coefficients features, respectively.ConclusionsAn EEG-based BCI can be developed to detect the appearance of unexpected obstacles. The average accuracy achieved is 79.5 % of success rate with a low number of false detections. Thus, the online performance of the BCI would be suitable for commanding in a safely way a lower limb exoskeleton during walking.

[1]  W. Walter,et al.  Contingent Negative Variation : An Electric Sign of Sensori-Motor Association and Expectancy in the Human Brain , 1964, Nature.

[2]  R. Blair,et al.  An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[3]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience Integrative Neuroscience Directed Interactions between Auditory and Superior Temporal Cortices and Their Role in Sensory Integration , 2022 .

[4]  Zoran Nenadic,et al.  Brain-computer interface driven functional electrical stimulation system for overground walking in spinal cord injury participant , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  Ronald N. Goodman,et al.  Neural decoding of treadmill walking from noninvasive electroencephalographic signals. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Jun Morimoto,et al.  EEG Single-Trial Detection of Gait Speed Changes during Treadmill Walk , 2015, PloS one.

[7]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Extracting Kinematic Parameters for Monkey Bipedal Walking from Cortical Neuronal Ensemble Activity , 2009, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[8]  Saeid Sanei,et al.  EEG signal processing , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  C. Tsai,et al.  Movement related cortical potentials of cued versus self‐initiated movements: Double dissociated modulation by dorsal premotor cortex versus supplementary motor area rTMS , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[10]  J. Contreras-Vidal,et al.  Decoding Intra-Limb and Inter-Limb Kinematics During Treadmill Walking From Scalp Electroencephalographic (EEG) Signals , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  Y. Kim,et al.  Classification of prefrontal and motor cortex signals for three-class fNIRS–BCI , 2015, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  Control of an Electrical Prosthesis With an SSVEP-Based BCI , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[15]  D. Farina,et al.  A brain–computer interface for single-trial detection of gait initiation from movement related cortical potentials , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  Keum-Shik Hong,et al.  Classification of functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals corresponding to the right- and left-wrist motor imagery for development of a brain–computer interface , 2013, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  Andrew B. Schwartz,et al.  Brain-Controlled Interfaces: Movement Restoration with Neural Prosthetics , 2006, Neuron.

[18]  D B Lindsley,et al.  Brain wave components of the contingent negative variation in humans. , 1976, Science.

[19]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[20]  Z J Koles,et al.  The quantitative extraction and topographic mapping of the abnormal components in the clinical EEG. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  Pavel Pudil,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 2006 .

[22]  Aaron M. Dollar,et al.  Lower Extremity Exoskeletons and Active Orthoses: Challenges and State-of-the-Art , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[23]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[24]  Andrés Úbeda,et al.  Changes in brain activity due to the sudden apparition of an obstacle during gait , 2015, 2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[25]  Zoran Nenadic,et al.  Brain-computer interface controlled robotic gait orthosis , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[26]  Volker Dietz,et al.  Preparation and performance of obstacle steps: interaction between brain and spinal neuronal activity , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  F. Díaz,et al.  How does a short history of spinal cord injury affect movement‐related brain potentials? , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  Andreea Ioana Sburlea,et al.  Continuous detection of the self-initiated walking pre-movement state from EEG correlates without session-to-session recalibration , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[29]  P. Vetter,et al.  Reliability and Stability of Contingent Negative Variation , 2000, Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback.