Analysis & Simulation of the Deep Sea Acoustic Channel for Sensor Networks

Nearly 70% of our planet is composed of an aquatic environment, however, due to the lack of appropriate scientific tools and also the relative hostility of the acquatic environment, much of it still remains unexplored. With the advent of global climatic changes, a pronounced energy crisis and changing ecological habitats understanding the oceans of our planet is of vital importance. Monitoring the aquatic environment continually and effectively for oceanographic data collection, offshore exploration, efficient navigation, disaster prevention and monitoring, marine bio sciences data collection, power source exploration and maintenance can now be made possible with the deployment of underwater sensor nodes (USNs). As in terrestrial wireless sensor networks (WSNs), usage of USNs deployed across a large area of the ocean in an underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs) can greatly enhance the quality of data collected within the aquatic environment. Recent advancements in unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) greatly extends the reach and applicability of UWSNs by enabling the integration of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) acting as mobile sensor nodes (MSNs) for the purposes of underwater resource exploration and also multi-vehicle & diver coordinated collaborative exploration missions for conducting complex investigations, while also enabling autonomous navigational and location determination methodologies. However, since radio frequency (RF) transmissions do not work underwater and optical communication is only suitable for short distances, an UWSN consists of a number of mobile and static nodes that usually communicate using the acoustic channel. Using the acoustic channel for communication causes an UWSN to contend with the issues of high transmission power requirements, rapidly changing channel characteristics, multi-path echoes, possible high ambient noise and interference, high and varying propagation delays and natural ocean currents in addition to the challenges posed by simple WSNs. As such, in order to examine the practices used by UWSNs for successful off-shore deep sea deployments this document first analyzes the underwater channel acoustic propagation model and also looks briefly at the characteristics of the underwater transducers along with the unique effect that they pose upon sonar based communication systems. The document then goes on to exploring the state of the art in UWSNs design paradigms followed by an analysis of areas that warrant research and a discussion of the work carried out during this thesis investigation along with a conclusion highlighting the contributions it makes.

[1]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Evolution of Seaweb underwater acoustic networking , 2000, OCEANS 2000 MTS/IEEE Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37158).

[2]  Kay Römer,et al.  Medium access control issues in sensor networks , 2006, CCRV.

[3]  Oliver Brock,et al.  Autonomous enhancement of disruption tolerant networks , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[4]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  Data muling over underwater wireless sensor networks using an autonomous underwater vehicle , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[5]  S. Singh,et al.  Multi-band acoustic modem for the communications and navigation aid AUV , 2005, Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE.

[6]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel , 2006, Underwater Networks.

[7]  W. H. Thorp Deep-Ocean Sound Attenuation in the Sub- and Low-Kilocycle-per-Second Region , 1965 .

[8]  J. G. Proakis,et al.  Direct sequence spread spectrum based modem for under water acoustic communication and channel measurements , 1999, Oceans '99. MTS/IEEE. Riding the Crest into the 21st Century. Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37008).

[9]  Martin W. Johnson,et al.  The Oceans: Their Physics, Chemistry, and General Biology , 1944 .

[10]  David L. Bradley Handbook of Underwater Acoustic Engineering , 2006 .

[11]  Jiejun Kong,et al.  The challenges of building mobile underwater wireless networks for aquatic applications , 2006, IEEE Network.

[12]  G. Acar,et al.  ACMENet: an underwater acoustic sensor network protocol for real-time environmental monitoring in coastal areas , 2006 .

[13]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Design and Simulation of an Underwater Acoustic Local Area Network , 1999 .

[14]  Vaduvur Bharghavan,et al.  MACAW: a media access protocol for wireless LAN's , 1994, SIGCOMM 1994.

[15]  Rodney F. W. Coates,et al.  Underwater Acoustic Systems , 1990 .

[16]  Joseph Rice,et al.  Seaweb Acoustic Communication and Navigation Networks , 2005 .

[17]  Zhu Fanglai Modeling and Simulation on Underwater Acoustic Communication Channel , 2013 .

[18]  H. W. Marsh,et al.  Sound Absorption in Sea Water , 1962 .

[19]  Anuj Sehgal,et al.  Variability of available capacity due to the effects of depth and temperature in the underwater acoustic communication channel , 2009, OCEANS 2009-EUROPE.

[20]  Mostafa H. Ammar,et al.  Message ferrying: proactive routing in highly-partitioned wireless ad hoc networks , 2003, The Ninth IEEE Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems, 2003. FTDCS 2003. Proceedings..

[21]  Rupesh R Kanthan The ICoN integrated communication and navigation protocol for underwater acoustic networks , 2005 .

[22]  Oliver Brock,et al.  MORA routing and capacity building in disruption-tolerant networks , 2008, Ad Hoc Networks.

[23]  Jochen Trumpf,et al.  Towards Optimal TDMA Scheduling for Robotic Swarm Communication , 2005 .

[24]  Lee Freitag,et al.  Integrated acoustic communication and navigation for multiple UUVs , 2001, MTS/IEEE Oceans 2001. An Ocean Odyssey. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37295).

[25]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges , 2005, Ad Hoc Networks.

[26]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Slotted FAMA: a MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks , 2006, OCEANS 2006 - Asia Pacific.

[27]  Lee Freitag,et al.  A network protocol for multiple AUV localization , 2002, OCEANS '02 MTS/IEEE.

[28]  S. Singh,et al.  The WHOI micro-modem: an acoustic communications and navigation system for multiple platforms , 2005, Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE.

[29]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Modeling the underwater acoustic channel in ns2 , 2007, ValueTools '07.

[30]  Ellen W. Zegura,et al.  A message ferrying approach for data delivery in sparse mobile ad hoc networks , 2004, MobiHoc '04.

[31]  L. Freitag,et al.  A Shallow Water Acoustic Network for Mine Countermeasures Operations with Autonomous Underwater Vehicles , 2005 .

[32]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Performance of adaptive MC-CDMA detectors in rapidly fading Rayleigh channels , 2003, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun..

[33]  Lee Freitag,et al.  An underwater network testbed: design, implementation and measurement , 2007, WuWNet '07.

[34]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Underwater acoustic networks , 2000, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[35]  W. D. Wilson Equation for the Speed of Sound in Sea Water , 1960 .

[36]  Michael A. Ainslie,et al.  A simplified formula for viscous and chemical absorption in sea water , 1998 .

[37]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  A MAC protocol for ad-hoc underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2006, Underwater Networks.

[38]  W. H. Thorp Analytic Description of the Low‐Frequency Attenuation Coefficient , 1967 .

[39]  Robert J. Urick,et al.  Principles of underwater sound , 1975 .

[40]  K. Mackenzie Nine‐term equation for sound speed in the oceans , 1981 .

[41]  Emanuele Crisostomi,et al.  Physical Characterization of Acoustic Communication Channel Properties in Underwater Mobile Sensor Networks , 2009, S-CUBE.

[42]  C. Leroy Development of Simple Equations for Accurate and More Realistic Calculation of the Speed of Sound in Seawater , 1969 .

[43]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Challenges for efficient communication in underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2004, SIGBED.

[44]  Kenneth V. Mackenzie,et al.  Discussion of sea water sound-speed determinations , 1981 .

[45]  Athanassios Z Panagiotopoulos,et al.  Molecular structural order and anomalies in liquid silica. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[46]  Lee Freitag,et al.  Analysis of channel effects on direct-sequence and frequency-hopped spread-spectrum acoustic communication , 2001 .

[47]  Brian Neil Levine,et al.  A survey of practical issues in underwater networks , 2006, MOCO.

[48]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Shallow water acoustic networks , 2001, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[49]  Yuan Li,et al.  Research challenges and applications for underwater sensor networking , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. WCNC 2006..

[50]  William F. Baker New formula for calculating acoustic propagation loss in a surface duct in the sea , 1975 .