An unsupervised method for quantifying the behavior of paired animals

Behaviors involving the interaction of multiple individuals are complex and frequently crucial for an animal's survival. These interactions, ranging across sensory modalities, length scales, and time scales, are often subtle and difficult to characterize. Contextual effects on the frequency of behaviors become even more difficult to quantify when physical interaction between animals interferes with conventional data analysis, e.g. due to visual occlusion. We introduce a method for quantifying behavior in fruit fly interaction that combines high-throughput video acquisition and tracking of individuals with recent unsupervised methods for capturing an animal's entire behavioral repertoire. We find behavioral differences between solitary flies and those paired with an individual of the opposite sex, identifying specific behaviors that are affected by social and spatial context. Our pipeline allows for a comprehensive description of the interaction between two individuals using unsupervised machine learning methods, and will be used to answer questions about the depth of complexity and variance in fruit fly courtship.

[1]  A. Pérez-Escudero,et al.  idTracker: tracking individuals in a group by automatic identification of unmarked animals , 2014, Nature Methods.

[2]  A. Cressant,et al.  Computerized video analysis of social interactions in mice , 2012, Nature Methods.

[3]  H. T. Spieth Courtship behavior in Drosophila. , 1974, Annual review of entomology.

[4]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Automated image-based tracking and its application in ecology. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Automated monitoring and analysis of social behavior in Drosophila , 2009, Nature Methods.

[6]  Yi Deng,et al.  Dynamic sensory cues shape song structure in Drosophila , 2014, Nature.

[7]  S. Hanson,et al.  Multivariate analysis of Drosophila courtship. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  M. Dickinson,et al.  A New Chamber for Studying the Behavior of Drosophila , 2010, PloS one.

[9]  Joshua W. Shaevitz,et al.  Predictability and hierarchy in Drosophila behavior , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  R. Tremblay,et al.  On aggression. , 1973, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  P. Perona,et al.  utomated multi-day tracking of marked mice for the analysis of ocial behaviour , 2013 .

[12]  C. Scharff,et al.  The songbird syrinx morphome: a three-dimensional, high-resolution, interactive morphological map of the zebra finch vocal organ , 2013, BMC Biology.

[13]  William Bialek,et al.  Mapping the stereotyped behaviour of freely moving fruit flies , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[14]  T. Markow,et al.  Behavioral and sensory basis of courtship success in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Adam Claridge‐Chang,et al.  The surveillance state of behavioral automation , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  Barry J. Dickson,et al.  fruitless Splicing Specifies Male Courtship Behavior in Drosophila , 2005, Cell.

[17]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Deciphering Interactions in Moving Animal Groups , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  K. O’Dell,et al.  The voyeurs’ guide to Drosophila melanogaster courtship , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[19]  Kristin Branson,et al.  JAABA: interactive machine learning for automatic annotation of animal behavior , 2013, Nature Methods.

[20]  N. Tinbergen On aims and methods of Ethology , 2010 .

[21]  Kevin Connolly,et al.  The Structure of Courtship in the Drosophila Melanogaster Species Sub-Group , 1986 .

[22]  Daniel A. Levitis,et al.  Behavioural biologists do not agree on what constitutes behaviour , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  Joshua W. Shaevitz,et al.  Predictability and hierarchy in Drosophila behavior , 2016 .

[24]  Mala Murthy,et al.  Multi-channel acoustic recording and automated analysis of Drosophila courtship songs , 2013, BMC Biology.

[25]  Pietro Perona,et al.  High-throughput Ethomics in Large Groups of Drosophila , 2009, Nature Methods.

[26]  A. Manning,et al.  The Courtship of Drosophila Melanogaster , 1955 .

[27]  Fernand Meyer,et al.  Topographic distance and watershed lines , 1994, Signal Process..

[28]  A. Sturtevant,et al.  Experiments on sex recognition and the problem of sexual selection in Drosoophilia. , 1915 .

[29]  R. Greenspan,et al.  Courtship in Drosophila. , 2003, Annual review of genetics.