Simple physical models connect theory and experiment in protein folding kinetics.

Our understanding of the principles underlying the protein-folding problem can be tested by developing and characterizing simple models that make predictions which can be compared to experimental data. Here we extend our earlier model of folding free energy landscapes, in which each residue is considered to be either folded as in the native state or completely disordered, by investigating the role of additional factors representing hydrogen bonding and backbone torsion strain, and by using a hybrid between the master equation approach and the simple transition state theory to evaluate kinetics near the free energy barrier in greater detail. Model calculations of folding phi-values are compared to experimental data for 19 proteins, and for more than half of these, experimental data are reproduced with correlation coefficients between r=0.41 and 0.88; calculations of transition state free energy barriers correlate with rates measured for 37 single domain proteins (r=0.69). The model provides insight into the contribution of alternative-folding pathways, the validity of quasi-equilibrium treatments of the folding landscape, and the magnitude of the Arrhenius prefactor for protein folding. Finally, we discuss the limitations of simple native-state-based models, and as a more general test of such models, provide predictions of folding rates and mechanisms for a comprehensive set of over 400 small protein domains of known structure.

[1]  L Serrano,et al.  The order of secondary structure elements does not determine the structure of a protein but does affect its folding kinetics. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Shoji Takada,et al.  Variational Theory for Site Resolved Protein Folding Free Energy Surfaces , 1998, cond-mat/9805366.

[3]  M. Delbrück Statistical Fluctuations in Autocatalytic Reactions , 1940 .

[4]  S. Jackson,et al.  How do small single-domain proteins fold? , 1998, Folding & design.

[5]  D. Baker,et al.  Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  D Baker,et al.  Critical role of beta-hairpin formation in protein G folding. , 2000, Nature structural biology.

[7]  Terrence G. Oas,et al.  The energy landscape of a fast-folding protein mapped by Ala→Gly Substitutions , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[8]  J. Banavar,et al.  Master Equation Approach to Protein Folding and Kinetic Traps , 1998, cond-mat/9803019.

[9]  S. Takada,et al.  Roles of native topology and chain-length scaling in protein folding: a simulation study with a Go-like model. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  J. Clarke,et al.  Mapping the folding pathway of an immunoglobulin domain: structural detail from Phi value analysis and movement of the transition state. , 2001, Structure.

[11]  A. Fersht,et al.  Exploring the energy surface of protein folding by structure-reactivity relationships and engineered proteins: observation of Hammond behavior for the gross structure of the transition state and anti-Hammond behavior for structural elements for unfolding/folding of barnase. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[12]  E I Shakhnovich,et al.  Differential stabilization of two hydrophobic cores in the transition state of the villin 14T folding reaction. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  A. Fersht,et al.  Mapping the transition state and pathway of protein folding by protein engineering , 1989, Nature.

[14]  Kam Y. J. Zhang,et al.  Accurate computer-based design of a new backbone conformation in the second turn of protein L. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  D Baker,et al.  Mechanisms of protein folding. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[16]  V. Daggett,et al.  Mapping the interactions present in the transition state for unfolding/folding of FKBP12. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  D. Baker,et al.  NMR characterization of residual structure in the denatured state of protein L. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Homer Jacobson,et al.  Intramolecular Reaction in Polycondensations. I. The Theory of Linear Systems , 1950 .

[19]  D. Baker,et al.  Critical role of β-hairpin formation in protein G folding , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[20]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and "en-route" intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  L Serrano,et al.  Structure of the transition state in the folding process of human procarboxypeptidase A2 activation domain. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  J. E. Rubio,et al.  The Theory of Linear Systems , 1971 .

[23]  Karsten Kristiansen,et al.  The formation of a native-like structure containing eight conserved hydrophobic residues is rate limiting in two-state protein folding of ACBP , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[24]  Christopher M. Dobson,et al.  Mutational analysis of acylphosphatase suggests the importance of topology and contact order in protein folding , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[25]  E. Alm,et al.  Prediction of protein-folding mechanisms from free-energy landscapes derived from native structures. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  David Baker,et al.  Experiment and theory highlight role of native state topology in SH3 folding , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[27]  Shoji Takada,et al.  Microscopic theory of protein folding rates. I. Fine structure of the free energy profile and folding routes from a variational approach , 2000, cond-mat/0008454.

[28]  P. Hänggi,et al.  Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers , 1990 .

[29]  L. Serrano,et al.  Obligatory steps in protein folding and the conformational diversity of the transition state , 1998, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[30]  Shoji Takada,et al.  Microscopic Theory of Protein Folding Rates.II: Local Reaction Coordinates and Chain Dynamics , 2000, cond-mat/0008455.

[31]  M. Akke,et al.  From snapshot to movie: phi analysis of protein folding transition states taken one step further. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  L Serrano,et al.  The folding of an enzyme. IV. Structure of an intermediate in the refolding of barnase analysed by a protein engineering procedure. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  Serrano,et al.  Structure of the transition state for folding of the 129 aa protein CheY resembles that of a smaller protein, CI-2. , 1995, Folding & design.

[34]  D Baker,et al.  A breakdown of symmetry in the folding transition state of protein L. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  D. Sherrington Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1983 .

[36]  L. Itzhaki,et al.  The folding pathway of the cell-cycle regulatory protein p13suc1: clues for the mechanism of domain swapping. , 2000, Structure.

[37]  L Serrano,et al.  The SH3-fold family: experimental evidence and prediction of variations in the folding pathways. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  A. Fersht,et al.  The structure of the transition state for folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 analysed by protein engineering methods: evidence for a nucleation-condensation mechanism for protein folding. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  A. Fersht,et al.  The folding of an enzyme. I. Theory of protein engineering analysis of stability and pathway of protein folding. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  W. Eaton,et al.  Searching for "downhill scenarios" in protein folding. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  J. Clarke,et al.  The folding of an immunoglobulin-like Greek key protein is defined by a common-core nucleus and regions constrained by topology. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  L. Serrano,et al.  A short linear peptide that folds into a native stable β-hairpin in aqueous solution , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[43]  R. Zwanzig,et al.  Simple model of protein folding kinetics. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  D. Otzen,et al.  Salt-induced detour through compact regions of the protein folding landscape. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  A. Finkelstein,et al.  A theoretical search for folding/unfolding nuclei in three-dimensional protein structures. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  David Baker,et al.  Computer-based redesign of a protein folding pathway , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[47]  V. Muñoz,et al.  A simple model for calculating the kinetics of protein folding from three-dimensional structures. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Kam Y. J. Zhang,et al.  Conversion of monomeric protein L to an obligate dimer by computational protein design , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  N. Kampen,et al.  Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry , 1981 .

[50]  E. Cota,et al.  The folding nucleus of a fibronectin type III domain is composed of core residues of the immunoglobulin-like fold. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[51]  Kenneth M. Merz,et al.  Rapid approximation to molecular surface area via the use of Boolean logic and look‐up tables , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..