Randomness in the evolution of cooperation

Tag-based ethnocentric cooperation is a highly robust behavior which can evolve and prevail under a wide variety of conditions. Recent studies have demonstrated, however, that ethnocentrism can temporarily be suppressed by other competing strategies, especially in its early evolutionary stages. In a series of computational experiments, conducted with an agent-based evolutionary model of tag-mediated cooperation, we addressed the question of whether a stochastically established and once dominant non-ethnocentric strategy such as indiscriminate altruism can stably persist and permanently outweigh ethnocentrism. Our model, simulated on various complex network topologies, employs simple haploid genetics and asexual reproduction of computational agents equipped with memory and heritable phenotypic traits. We find that in combination with an implemented memory mechanism and tags, random bias acting in favor of altruists can lead to their long-lasting victory over all other types of strategists. The difference in density between altruistic and ethnocentric cooperators increases with greater rewiring of the underlying network, but decreases with growing population size. These findings suggest that randomness plays an important role in promoting non-ethnocentric cooperation and contributes to our understanding of how other than adaptive mechanisms can initiate the design of novel behavioral phenotypes, thereby shaping surprisingly new evolutionary pathways.

[1]  D. Stauffer,et al.  Benefits of memory for the evolution of tag-based cooperation in structured populations , 2014, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  David G. Rand,et al.  Direct reciprocity in structured populations , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  David G. Rand,et al.  The Emergence of “Us and Them” in 80 Lines of Code , 2014, Psychological science.

[4]  Lael J. Schooler,et al.  Forgetting Constrains the Emergence of Cooperative Decision Strategies , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[5]  Christian Schulze,et al.  Agent‐based Computer Simulations of Language Choice Dynamics , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  W. Sherwin,et al.  Cultural transmission of tool use combined with habitat specializations leads to fine-scale genetic structure in bottlenose dolphins , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Zhihai Rong,et al.  Diversity of reproduction time scale promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma games. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  David G. Rand,et al.  Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  M. Jahanshahi,et al.  Random number generation as an index of controlled processing. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[10]  J. Avise,et al.  The genetic mating system of a sea spider with male-biased sexual size dimorphism: evidence for paternity skew despite random mating success , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  A. Traulsen,et al.  Evil green beards: Tag recognition can also be used to withhold cooperation in structured populations. , 2014, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  S. Balshine,et al.  Cooperating in the face of uncertainty: A consistent framework for understanding the evolution of cooperation , 2007, Behavioural Processes.

[13]  Robert A. Laird,et al.  Evolutionary Strategy Dynamics for Tag-Based Cooperation and Defection in the Spatial and Aspatial snowdrift Game , 2012, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[14]  K. Laland,et al.  How culture shaped the human genome: bringing genetics and the human sciences together , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[15]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  Coevolution of strategy-selection time scale and cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game , 2013 .

[16]  E. Tibbetts,et al.  Preferential phenotypic association linked with cooperation in paper wasps , 2013, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[17]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. , 2007, Psychological review.

[18]  S. Focardi,et al.  May random processes explain mating success in leks? , 1996, Behavioural Processes.

[19]  Dietrich Stauffer,et al.  A Biased Review of Sociophysics , 2012, ArXiv.

[20]  G. Gottlieb Developmental-behavioral initiation of evolutionary change. , 2002, Psychological review.

[21]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Integrating cooperative breeding into theoretical concepts of cooperation , 2007, Behavioural Processes.

[22]  F. Jones,et al.  Simulation Models of Group Segregation , 1985 .

[23]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Mechanisms for similarity based cooperation , 2008 .

[24]  M. Feldman,et al.  Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  M. Small,et al.  Adjusting learning motivation to promote cooperation , 2010 .

[26]  R. Coppinger,et al.  Wolf-pack (Canis lupus) hunting strategies emerge from simple rules in computational simulations , 2011, Behavioural Processes.

[27]  Dietrich Stauffer,et al.  Evolution of tag-mediated altruistic behavior in one-shot encounters on large-scale complex networks , 2012, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[28]  D. Haun,et al.  The development of tag-based cooperation via a socially acquired trait , 2013 .

[29]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Intuitive Prosociality , 2013 .

[30]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Foundations of cooperation in young children , 2008, Cognition.

[31]  Friederike Mengel,et al.  Limited memory can be beneficial for the evolution of cooperation. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  R. Hanneman,et al.  Coevolutionary Dynamics of Cultural Markers, Parochial Cooperation, and Networks , 2014 .

[33]  Randomness in Evolution , 2005 .

[34]  Tibor Antala,et al.  Sympathy and similarity : The evolutionary dynamics of cooperation , 2009 .

[35]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[36]  Susan F Butler,et al.  On producing random binary sequences. , 2009, The American journal of psychology.

[37]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Computational models of collective behavior , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  David G. Rand,et al.  Human cooperation , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  Long Wang,et al.  Adaptive tag switching reinforces the coevolution of contingent cooperation and tag diversity. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  Andy M. Reynolds,et al.  Movement patterns of Tenebrio beetles demonstrate empirically that correlated-random-walks have similitude with a Lévy walk , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[41]  T. Bereczkei,et al.  Altruism towards strangers in need: costly signaling in an industrial society , 2010 .

[42]  S. Pratt,et al.  An agent-based model of collective nest choice by the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  Zhi-Dan Zhao,et al.  Epidemic spreading on hierarchical geographical networks with mobile agents , 2013, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation.

[44]  John M McNamara,et al.  Towards a richer evolutionary game theory , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[45]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Emergent Processes in Group Behavior , 2022 .

[46]  Andrew W. Bausch Stochastic interactions increase cooperation in a spatial Prisoner's Dilemma , 2015, Complex..

[47]  Toshio Yamagishi,et al.  In-group bias and culture of collectivism* , 1998 .

[48]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Similarity-based cooperation and spatial segregation. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[49]  Bing-Hong Wang,et al.  Universal effect of dynamical reinforcement learning mechanism in spatial evolutionary games , 2012 .

[50]  Carsten K. W. De Dreu,et al.  Oxytocin modulates cooperation within and competition between groups: An integrative review and research agenda , 2012, Hormones and Behavior.

[51]  Hongbin Wang,et al.  Perception of randomness: On the time of streaks , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[52]  E. Fehr,et al.  The Coevolution of Cultural Groups and Ingroup Favoritism , 2008, Science.

[53]  José Roberto Castilho Piqueira,et al.  Self-organized criticality and the predictability of human behavior , 2011 .

[54]  Pat Barclay,et al.  A cue of kinship promotes cooperation for the public good , 2008 .

[55]  William Skylark Relatively random: Context effects on perceived randomness and predicted outcomes , 2013 .

[56]  William A. V. Clark,et al.  Understanding the social context of the Schelling segregation model , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  R. Bshary,et al.  The interplay of cognition and cooperation , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[59]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[60]  Naoki Masuda,et al.  Ingroup favoritism and intergroup cooperation under indirect reciprocity based on group reputation , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[61]  Mario Paolucci,et al.  On agent-based modeling and computational social science , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[62]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  How mutation affects evolutionary games on graphs. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[63]  A. Colman,et al.  Spontaneous similarity discrimination in the evolution of cooperation. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[64]  Tim Clutton-Brock,et al.  Cooperation between non-kin in animal societies , 2009, Nature.

[65]  F. W. S. Lima,et al.  Non-Classical Connectionist Models of Visual Object Recognition , 2012, Cognitive Computation.

[66]  M. Newman,et al.  Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[67]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Chromodynamics of accents? [Commentary on: Emma Cohen: The Evolution of Tag-Based Cooperation in Humans: The Case for Accent.] , 2012 .

[68]  Carolyn H. Declerck,et al.  When do people cooperate? The neuroeconomics of prosocial decision making , 2013, Brain and Cognition.

[69]  K. Laland,et al.  Darwin in Mind: New Opportunities for Evolutionary Psychology , 2011, PLoS biology.

[70]  Joseph Henrich,et al.  Chimpanzees share food for many reasons: the role of kinship, reciprocity, social bonds and harassment on food transfers , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[71]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Agent-Based and Individual-Based Modeling: A Practical Introduction , 2011 .

[72]  Thomas R. Shultz,et al.  The Evolutionary Dominance of Ethnocentric Cooperation , 2013, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[73]  M. Nowak Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation , 2006, Science.

[74]  John N. Towse,et al.  Random number generation and working memory , 2007 .

[75]  Guiyi Wei,et al.  Stochastic Heterogeneous Interaction Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game , 2014, PloS one.

[76]  Martin H. Krieger,et al.  Modeling urban change , 1971 .

[77]  Feng Fu,et al.  Global Migration Can Lead to Stronger Spatial Selection than Local Migration , 2013, Journal of statistical physics.

[78]  Jean Clobert,et al.  Self-recognition, color signals, and cycles of greenbeard mutualism and altruism. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[79]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[80]  A. Neuringer Can people behave "randomly?": The role of feedback. , 1986 .

[81]  R. Bshary,et al.  Cooperation and deception: from evolution to mechanisms , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[82]  David Hales,et al.  Change Your Tags Fast! - A Necessary Condition for Cooperation? , 2004, MABS.

[83]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Variation in behaviour promotes cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma game , 2004, Nature.

[84]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Minimal model for tag-based cooperation. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[85]  T. Griffiths,et al.  Why are people bad at detecting randomness? A statistical argument. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[86]  R. Riolo,et al.  Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity , 2001, Nature.

[87]  Toshio Yamagishi,et al.  In Search of Homo economicus , 2014, Psychological science.

[88]  F. Bartumeus Behavioral intermittence, Lévy patterns, and randomness in animal movement , 2009 .

[89]  D. Helbing,et al.  The outbreak of cooperation among success-driven individuals under noisy conditions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[90]  A. Hama Supercooperators: Altruism, Evolution, and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed , 2012 .

[91]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of cooperation by phenotypic similarity , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[92]  Ross A. Hammond,et al.  The Evolution of Ethnocentrism , 2006 .

[93]  A. Gardner,et al.  Sixteen common misconceptions about the evolution of cooperation in humans , 2011 .

[94]  Jae-Woo Kim,et al.  A Tag-Based Evolutionary Prisoner's Dilemma Game on Networks with Different Topologies , 2010, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[95]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Agent-Based Modeling: A New Approach for Theory Building in Social Psychology , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[96]  M. Tomasello Why We Cooperate , 2009 .

[97]  Robert A Laird,et al.  Green-beard effect predicts the evolution of traitorousness in the two-tag Prisoner's dilemma. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[98]  Robert Kurzban,et al.  Experiments investigating cooperative types in humans: a complement to evolutionary theory and simulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.