Evolutionary Robotics and the Radical Envelope-of-Noise Hypothesis

For several years now, various researchers have endeavored to apply artificial evolution to the automatic design of control systems for real robots. One of the major challenges they face concerns the question of how to assess the fitness of evolving controllers when each evolutionary run typically involves hundreds of thousands of such assessments. This article outlines new ways of thinking about and building simulations upon which such assessments can be performed. It puts forward sufficient conditions for the successful transfer of evolved controllers from simulation to reality and develops a potential methodology for building simulations in which evolving controllers are forced to satisfy these conditions if they are to be reliably fit. It is hypothesized that as long as simulations are built according to this methodology, it does not matter how inaccurate or incomplete they are: Controllers that have evolved to be reliably fit in simulation still will transfer into reality. Two sets of experiments are reported, both of which involve minimal look-up table-based simulations built according to these guidelines. In the first set, controllers were evolved that allowed a Khepera robot to perform a simple memory task in the real world. In the second set, controllers were evolved for the Sussex University gantry robot that were able to distinguish visually a triangle from a square, under extremely noisy real-world conditions, and to steer the robot toward the triangle. In both cases, controllers that were reliably fit in simulation displayed extremely robust behavior when downloaded into reality.

[1]  W. Brogan Modern Control Theory , 1971 .

[2]  Nils J. Nilsson,et al.  Shakey the Robot , 1984 .

[3]  V. Braitenberg Vehicles, Experiments in Synthetic Psychology , 1984 .

[4]  William L. Brogan,et al.  Modern control theory (3rd ed.) , 1991 .

[5]  David R. Jefferson,et al.  Selection in Massively Parallel Genetic Algorithms , 1991, ICGA.

[6]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence Without Reason , 1991, IJCAI.

[7]  SAGAInman HarveyCSRP Species Adaptation Genetic Algorithms A Basis for a Continuing SAGA , 1992 .

[8]  Inman Harvey,et al.  Evolution Versus Design: Controlling Autonomous Robots , 1992, Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of AI, Simulation, and Planning in High Autonomy Systems 'Integrating Perception, Planning and Action'..

[9]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  Robustness of a distributed neural network controller for locomotion in a hexapod robot , 1992, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  Evolving Dynamical Neural Networks for Adaptive Behavior , 1992, Adapt. Behav..

[11]  Nick Jakobi,et al.  Half-baked, Ad-hoc and Noisy: Minimal Simulations for Evolutionary Robotics , 1993 .

[12]  George Adrian Horridge,et al.  What can engineers learn from insect vision? , 1992, Proceedings of IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Conference - SMC.

[13]  Piero Mussio,et al.  Toward a Practice of Autonomous Systems , 1994 .

[14]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  Automatic creation of an autonomous agent: genetic evolution of a neural-network driven robot , 1994 .

[15]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  How to Evolve Autonomous Robots: Different Approaches in Evolutionary Robotics , 1994 .

[16]  D. Parisi,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity in evolving neural networks , 1994, Proceedings of PerAc '94. From Perception to Action.

[17]  RobotDario Floreano,et al.  Automatic Creation of an Autonomous Agent : GeneticEvolution of a Neural-Network Driven , 1994 .

[18]  Inman Harvey,et al.  Seeing the light: artificial evolution, real vision , 1994 .

[19]  Adrian Thompson,et al.  Evolving Electronic Robot Controller that Exploit Hardware Resources , 1995, ECAL.

[20]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Evolving Mobile Robots in Simulated and Real Environments , 1995, Artificial Life.

[21]  Olivier Michel An Artificial Life Approach for the Synthesis of Autonomous Agents , 1995, Artificial Evolution.

[22]  Inman Harvey,et al.  Noise and the Reality Gap: The Use of Simulation in Evolutionary Robotics , 1995, ECAL.

[23]  Nick Jakobi Encoding Scheme Issues for Open-Ended Artificial Evolution , 1996, PPSN.

[24]  Adrian Thompson,et al.  An Evolved Circuit, Intrinsic in Silicon, Entwined with Physics , 1996, ICES.

[25]  Dave Cliff,et al.  Challenges in evolving controllers for physical robots , 1996, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[26]  T. Collett,et al.  Insect navigation en route to the goal: multiple strategies for the use of landmarks , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[27]  Phil Husbands,et al.  Evolutionary robotics , 2014, Evolutionary Intelligence.