Energy-Aware Spiral Coverage Path Planning for UAV Photogrammetric Applications

Most unmanned aerial vehicles nowadays engage in coverage missions using simple patterns, such as back-and-forth and spiral. However, there is no general agreement about which one is more appropriate. This letter proposes an E-Spiral algorithm for accurate photogrammetry that considers the camera sensor and the flight altitude to apply the overlapping necessary to guarantee the mission success. The algorithm uses an energy model to set different optimal speeds for straight segments of the path, reducing the energy consumption. We also propose an improvement for the energy model to predict the overall energy of the paths. We compare E-Spiral and E-BF algorithms in simulations over more than 3500 polygonal areas with different characteristics, such as vertices, irregularity, and size. Results showed that E-Spiral outperforms E-BF in all the cases, providing an effective energy saving even in the worst scenario with a percentage improvement of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$10.37\%$</tex-math> </inline-formula> up to the best case with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{16.1}\%$</tex-math> </inline-formula> of improvement. Real flights performed with a quadrotor state the effectiveness of the E-Spiral over E-BF in two areas, presenting an improvement of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{9}\%$</tex-math> </inline-formula> in the time and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{7.7}\%$</tex-math></inline-formula> in the energy. The improved energy model increases the time and the energy estimation precision of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{13.24}\%$</tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX"> $\text{13.41}\%$</tex-math></inline-formula>, respectively.

[1]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[2]  Yang Liu,et al.  A Safe Flight Approach of the UAV in the Electrical Line Inspection , 2015 .

[3]  Anjan Chakrabarty,et al.  Green flight challenge: Aircraft design and flight planning for extreme fuel efficiency , 2013 .

[4]  Giorgio C. Buttazzo,et al.  Coverage Path Planning for UAVs Photogrammetry with Energy and Resolution Constraints , 2016, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[5]  Howie Choset,et al.  Coverage for robotics – A survey of recent results , 2001, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[6]  Christos Levcopoulos,et al.  Quasi-greedy triangulations approximating the minimum weight triangulation , 1996, SODA '96.

[7]  Gustav Öst Search path generation with UAV applications using approximate convex decomposition , 2012 .

[8]  M. Er,et al.  Coverage path planning for UAVs based on enhanced exact cellular decomposition method , 2011 .

[9]  Iván Fernando Mondragón,et al.  Air Drones for Explosive Landmines Detection , 2013, ROBOT.

[10]  Artsiom Stalmakou UAV/UAS path planning for ice management information gathering , 2011 .

[11]  Håvard Lægreid Andersen Path Planning for Search and Rescue Mission using Multicopters , 2014 .

[12]  Antonio Barrientos,et al.  Aerial remote sensing in agriculture: A practical approach to area coverage and path planning for fleets of mini aerial robots , 2011, J. Field Robotics.

[13]  José L. Verdegay,et al.  Coverage path planning with unmanned aerial vehicles for 3D terrain reconstruction , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Anjan Chakrabarty,et al.  Energy-Based Long-Range Path Planning for Soaring-Capable Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2011 .