The Social Gene

SynopsisSkew selection is a multiple-selection model (not to be confused with a multi-level selection model) that explains the inherent duality of social behavior from an individualistic, self-preservation point of view. The dual behaviors of social beings are ‘greed’ and ‘sharing’. Greed produces resource stockpiles. Stockpiles buffer an individual from famine. Sharing aggregates individuals into groups. Groups buffer an individual from predation through safety-in-numbers. In this paper, skew selection is applied to genes as a potential solution for two genomic puzzles: (1) junk DNA; and (2) the C-value enigma. Junk DNA refers to the large number of non-coding DNA sequences within a genome. Skew selection hypothesizes that, when genes are exposed to agents of predation such as point mutations, viral infections or chromosomal crossovers, genes that share resources with a large number of junk DNA sequences will survive longer than genes that do not share. The C-value enigma refers to the lack of relationship between genomic size and animal complexity. Skew selection hypothesizes that genomic size and animal complexity evolve independently of each other. Genomic size (i.e., junk DNA) shields genes from agents of mutation, viruses or chromosomal crossovers. Animal complexity (i.e., gene diversity) buffers genes from resource scarcity by allowing organisms to exploit diverse resources. In conclusion, by viewing gene survival through the lens of skew selection, molecular biologists gain insight into the evolution of genomic size and animal complexity as independent survival strategies of self-interested genes facing multiple agents of selection.

[1]  W. Tschinkel,et al.  Fire ant thermal preferences: behavioral control of growth and metabolism , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  S. Ohno,et al.  So much "junk" DNA in our genome. , 1972, Brookhaven symposia in biology.

[3]  J. Hirshleifer The Dark Side of the Force: Economic Foundations of Conflict Theory , 2001 .

[4]  W. Doolittle Hierarchical Approaches to Genome Evolution , 1988 .

[5]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  S. Stearns,et al.  The Evolution of Life Histories , 1992 .

[7]  S. Porter,et al.  Comparison of Polygyne and Monogyne Red Imported Fire Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Population Densities , 1996 .

[8]  M. Nei,et al.  Gene Duplication and Nucleotide Substitution in Evolution , 1969, Nature.

[9]  E. Sober,et al.  Summary of: ‘Unto Others. The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior' , 1998 .

[10]  C. A. Thomas The genetic organization of chromosomes. , 1971, Annual review of genetics.

[11]  J. Landa Bioeconomics of schooling fishes: selfish fish, quasi-free riders, and other fishy tales , 1998, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[12]  E. Wilson The Fire Ant , 1958 .

[13]  Janet Tai Landa,et al.  Why Ants Do but Honeybees Do Not Construct Satellite Nests , 2003 .

[14]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[15]  G. Bernardi,et al.  The human genome: organization and evolutionary history. , 1995, Annual review of genetics.

[16]  S. Andersson,et al.  Genome deterioration: loss of repeated sequences and accumulation of junk DNA , 2002, Genetica.

[17]  T. Gregory Variation across amphibian species in the size of the nuclear genome supports a pluralistic, hierarchical approach to the C‐value enigma , 2003 .

[18]  William C. Frederick,et al.  Creatures, Corporations, Communities, Chaos, Complexity , 1998 .

[19]  Skew Selection: Nature Favors a Trickle-Down Distribution of Resources in Ants * , 2003 .

[20]  W. Makałowski,et al.  Genomic scrap yard: how genomes utilize all that junk. , 2000, Gene.

[21]  D. Cassill,et al.  Rules of supply and demand regulate recruitment to food in an ant society , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  D. Cassill Yoyo-bang: a risk-aversion investment strategy by a perennial insect society , 2002, Oecologia.

[23]  Amots Zehavi,et al.  The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin's Puzzle , 1997 .

[24]  A. Mirsky,et al.  THE DESOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID CONTENT OF ANIMAL CELLS AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE , 1951, The Journal of general physiology.

[25]  L. C. Drickamer,et al.  Animal Behavior: Concepts, Processes, and Methods , 1986 .

[26]  W. Tschinkel,et al.  Mechanisms of population regulation in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta: an experimental study , 2001 .

[27]  P. Deloukas,et al.  A Gene Map of the Human Genome , 1996, Science.

[28]  M. Ridley The origins of virtue : human instincts and the evolution of cooperation , 1998 .

[29]  J. Alcock Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach , 1975 .

[30]  F. Waal,et al.  Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals , 1996 .

[31]  S. Porter Impact of temperature on colony growth and developmental rates of the ant, Solenopsis invicta , 1988 .

[32]  S. Porter,et al.  Comparison of Diets of Two Fire Ant Species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Solid and Liquid Components , 1991 .

[33]  Jack Hirshleifer,et al.  There are many evolutionary pathways to cooperation , 1999 .

[34]  G. K. Wong,et al.  Is "junk" DNA mostly intron DNA? , 2000, Genome research.

[35]  Michael T. Ghiselin,et al.  The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex , 1964 .