Limits on action priming by pictures of objects.

When does looking at an object prime actions associated with using it, and what aspects of those actions are primed? We examined whether viewing manmade objects with handles would selectively facilitate responses for the hand closest to the handle, attempting to replicate a study reported by Tucker and Ellis (1998). We also examined whether the hypothesized action priming effects depended upon the response hand's proximity to an object. In 7 experiments, participants made judgments about whether pictured objects were manmade or natural or whether the objects were upright or inverted. They responded by pressing buttons located either on the same or opposite side as the objects' handles, at variable distances. Action priming was observed only when participants were explicitly instructed to imagine picking up the pictured objects while making their judgments; the data provide no evidence for task-general automatic priming of lateralized responses by object handles. These data indicate that visually encoding an object activates spatially localized action representations only under special circumstances.

[1]  N. White,et al.  A test of the embodied simulation theory of object perception: potentiation of responses to artifacts and animals , 2014, Psychological research.

[2]  Nicholas P. Holmes,et al.  Dissociating between object affordances and spatial compatibility effects using early response components , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[3]  D. Bub,et al.  On the dynamics of action representations evoked by names of manipulable objects. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  K. Yarrow,et al.  Viewing objects and planning actions: On the potentiation of grasping behaviours by visual objects , 2011, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  R. Proctor,et al.  Correspondence effects for objects with opposing left and right protrusions. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Craig S. Chapman,et al.  To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  Rapid communication: Seeing and doing: Ability to act moderates orientation effects in object perception , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  Terhi Mustonen,et al.  Mapping the identity of a viewed hand in the motor system: evidence from stimulus-response compatibility. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  L. Vainio,et al.  Motor inhibition associated with the affordance of briefly displayed objects , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  R. Nicoletti,et al.  On the relationship between affordance and Simon effects: Are the effects really independent? , 2011 .

[11]  Gaetano Tieri,et al.  Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  R. Nicoletti,et al.  Simon-Like and Functional Affordance Effects with Tools: The Effects of Object Perceptual Discrimination and Object Action State , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Steven A. Jax,et al.  Response interference between functional and structural actions linked to the same familiar object , 2010, Cognition.

[14]  D. Bub,et al.  Grasping beer mugs: on the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Action semantic knowledge about objects is supported by functional motor activation. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  L. Vainio,et al.  On the relations between action planning, object identification, and motor representations of observed actions and objects , 2008, Cognition.

[17]  Christopher C. Davoli,et al.  Altered vision near the hands , 2008, Cognition.

[18]  L. Riggio,et al.  The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[19]  George S. Cree,et al.  Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words , 2008, Cognition.

[20]  Sandro Rubichi,et al.  8. Do we access object manipulability while we categorize? Evidence from reaction time studies , 2007 .

[21]  Rob Ellis,et al.  Does selecting one visual object from several require inhibition of the actions associated with nonselected objects? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Ed Symes,et al.  Visual object affordances: object orientation. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[23]  D. Bub,et al.  Gestural knowledge evoked by objects as part of conceptual representations , 2006 .

[24]  S. Tipper,et al.  Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  R. Ellis,et al.  The potentiation of two components of the reach-to-grasp action during object categorisation in visual memory. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[26]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  The time course of visuo-motor affordances , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Jonathan S. Cant,et al.  No evidence for visuomotor priming in a visually guided action task , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  Ed Symes,et al.  Dissociating object-based and space-based affordances , 2005 .

[29]  A. Borghi Grounding Cognition: Object Concepts and Action , 2005 .

[30]  R. Ellis,et al.  Action priming by briefly presented objects. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[31]  R. Passingham,et al.  Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[32]  J. Decety,et al.  Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  S. Anderson,et al.  Attentional processes link perception and action , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Action matters: The role of action plans and object affordances in selection for action , 2002 .

[35]  R. Ellis,et al.  The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization , 2001 .

[36]  R. Ellis,et al.  Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[37]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[38]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Evidence for visuomotor priming effect , 1996, Neuroreport.

[40]  W. Dunlap,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Experiments With Matched Groups or Repeated Measures Designs , 1996 .

[41]  Giancarlo Tassinari,et al.  The Role of the Corpus Callosum and Bilaterally Distributed Motor Pathways in the Synchronization of Bilateral Upper-Limb Responses to Lateralized Light Stimuli , 1994 .