Equivalence results in the allocation of indivisible objects : A unified view

This paper studies probabilistic mechanisms that allocate indivisible objects to agents by hierarchical exchange using the top-trading cycles algorithm. The main result of this paper is a general technique for proving that seemingly different probabilistic mechanisms are in fact equivalent. This approach simplifies and unifies several equivalence results in the literature. The same technique is used to generalize these results to mechanisms in which the priority structure for each object is given by a tree (instead of a linear ordering of the agents).

[1]  S. Pápai,et al.  Strategyproof Assignment by Hierarchical Exchange , 2000 .

[2]  Lin Zhou On a conjecture by gale about one-sided matching problems , 1990 .

[3]  C. Bird Group incentive compatibility in a market with indivisible goods , 1984 .

[4]  Hervé Moulin,et al.  A New Solution to the Random Assignment Problem , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[5]  Tayfun Sönmez,et al.  House Allocation with Existing Tenants: An Equivalence , 2001, Games Econ. Behav..

[6]  A. Roth Incentive compatibility in a market with indivisible goods , 1982 .

[7]  L. Shapley,et al.  On cores and indivisibility , 1974 .

[8]  Lars-Gunnar Svensson,et al.  Strategy-proofness, core, and sequential trade , 2005 .

[9]  Oriol Carbonell-Nicolau Games and Economic Behavior , 2011 .

[10]  Donald E. Knuth An Exact Analysis of Stable Allocation , 1996, J. Algorithms.

[11]  Özgün Ekici,et al.  Fair and E ¢ cient Discrete Resource Allocation : A Market Approach , 2010 .

[12]  R. Zeckhauser,et al.  The Efficient Allocation of Individuals to Positions , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  Andrew Postlewaite,et al.  Weak Versus Strong Domination in a Market with Indivisible Goods , 1977 .

[14]  Jay Sethuraman,et al.  Lotteries in Student Assignment: An Equivalence Result , 2010 .

[15]  Atila Abdulkadiroglu,et al.  RANDOM SERIAL DICTATORSHIP AND THE CORE FROM RANDOM ENDOWMENTS IN HOUSE ALLOCATION PROBLEMS , 1998 .

[16]  Parag A. Pathak,et al.  The Mechanism Design Approach to Student Assignment , 2011 .

[17]  M. Utku Ünver,et al.  Matching, Allocation, and Exchange of Discrete Resources , 2009 .

[18]  Parag A. Pathak,et al.  The New York City High School Match , 2005 .