Progress in outdoor navigation by the SAIL developmental robot

A sensory mapping method, called Staggered Hierarchical Mapping (SHM), and its developmental algorithm are described in this paper. SHM is a model motivated by human early visual pathways including processing performed by the retina, Lateral Geniculate Nucleus (LGN) and the primary visual cortex. The work reported here concerns not only the design of such a series of processors but also their autonomous development. The primary goal is to address a long standing open problem of visual information processing in that processing elements that are dedicated to receptive fields of different retinal positions and different scales (sizes) must be concurrently functioning, in robotic and other applications in unstructured environments. A new Incremental Principal Component Analysis (IPCA) method is used to automatically develop orientation sensitive and other needed filters. For a fast convergence, the lateral inhibition of sensory neurons is modelled by what is called residual images. A set of staggered receptive fields models the pattern of positioning of processing cells. From sequentially sensed video frames, the proposed developing algorithm develops a hierarchy of filters, whose outputs are uncorrelated within each layer, but with increasing scale of receptive fields from low to higher layers. To study the completeness of the representation generated by the SHM, we experimentally show that the response produced at any layer is sufficient to corresponding retinal image. As an application domain, we describe out preliminary experiments of autonomous navigation by the SAIL robot, and why a mapping like the SHM is needed in our next phase of work of vision guided autonomous navigation in outdoor environments.

[1]  J. Weng,et al.  Convergence Analysis of Complementary Candid Incremental Principal Component Analysis ∗ , 2001 .

[2]  Takayuki Ito,et al.  Neocognitron: A neural network model for a mechanism of visual pattern recognition , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[3]  Terence D. Sanger,et al.  Optimal unsupervised learning in a single-layer linear feedforward neural network , 1989, Neural Networks.

[4]  Joseph J. Atick,et al.  What Does the Retina Know about Natural Scenes? , 1992, Neural Computation.

[5]  Joseph J. Atick,et al.  Convergent Algorithm for Sensory Receptive Field Development , 1993, Neural Computation.

[6]  Narendra Ahuja,et al.  Learning Recognition and Segmentation Using the Cresceptron , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[7]  M. Sur,et al.  Rewiring cortex: the role of patterned activity in development and plasticity of neocortical circuits. , 1999, Journal of neurobiology.

[8]  J. Rubner,et al.  Development of feature detectors by self-organization , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  Juyang Weng,et al.  Hierarchical Discriminant Regression , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  R. Linsker,et al.  From basic network principles to neural architecture , 1986 .

[11]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  The “independent components” of natural scenes are edge filters , 1997, Vision Research.

[12]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  G B Stanley,et al.  Reconstruction of Natural Scenes from Ensemble Responses in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.