Isolating Influential Regions of Electrostatic Focusing in Protein and DNA Structure

Electrostatic focusing is a general phenomenon that occurs in cavities and grooves on the molecular surface of biomolecules. Narrow surface features can partially shield charged atoms from the high-dielectric solvent, enhancing electrostatic potentials inside the cavity and projecting electric field lines outward into the solvent. This effect has been observed in many instances and is widely considered in the human examination of molecular structure, but it is rarely integrated into the digital representations used in protein structure comparison software. To create a computational representation of electrostatic focusing, that is compatible with structure comparison algorithms, this paper presents an approach that generates three-dimensional solids that approximate regions where focusing occurs. We verify the accuracy of this representation against instances of focusing in proteins and DNA. Noting that this representation also identifies thin focusing regions on the molecular surface that are unlikely to affect binding, we describe a second algorithm that conservatively isolates larger focusing regions. The resulting 3D solids can be compared with Boolean set operations, permitting a new range of analyses on the regions where electrostatic focusing occurs. They also represent a novel integration of molecular shape and electrostatic focusing into the same structure comparison framework.

[1]  Barry Honig,et al.  Extending the Applicability of the Nonlinear Poisson−Boltzmann Equation: Multiple Dielectric Constants and Multivalent Ions† , 2001 .

[2]  R. Russell,et al.  Detection of protein three-dimensional side-chain patterns: new examples of convergent evolution. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  S. Umeyama,et al.  Least-Squares Estimation of Transformation Parameters Between Two Point Patterns , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  J. Ponder,et al.  Force fields for protein simulations. , 2003, Advances in protein chemistry.

[5]  Lenwood S Heath,et al.  Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants. , 2002, Journal of experimental botany.

[6]  Barry Honig,et al.  GRASP2: visualization, surface properties, and electrostatics of macromolecular structures and sequences. , 2003, Methods in enzymology.

[7]  W R Taylor,et al.  SSAP: sequential structure alignment program for protein structure comparison. , 1996, Methods in enzymology.

[8]  K. Sharp,et al.  Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules: theory and applications. , 1990, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[9]  R. Sauer,et al.  Are buried salt bridges important for protein stability and conformational specificity? , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[10]  Alexander Tropsha,et al.  Energetic decomposition of the α-helix-coil equilibrium of a dynamic model system , 1998 .

[11]  A. Warshel,et al.  Calculations of electrostatic interactions in biological systems and in solutions , 1984, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[12]  B. Tidor,et al.  Do salt bridges stabilize proteins? A continuum electrostatic analysis , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[13]  Barry Honig,et al.  Focusing of electric fields in the active site of Cu‐Zn superoxide dismutase: Effects of ionic strength and amino‐acid modification , 1986, Proteins.

[14]  B. Honig,et al.  Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. , 1995, Science.

[15]  G. Klebe,et al.  A new method to detect related function among proteins independent of sequence and fold homology. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  S. Harvey.  Treatment of electrostatic effects in macromolecular modeling , 1989, Proteins.

[18]  S H White,et al.  Direct measurement of salt-bridge solvation energies using a peptide model system: implications for protein stability. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  B Tidor,et al.  Effects of salt bridges on protein structure and design , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[20]  J. Richardson,et al.  Determination and analysis of the 2 A-structure of copper, zinc superoxide dismutase. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  Brian Y. Chen,et al.  A volumetric method for representing and comparing regions of electrostatic focusing in molecular structure , 2012, BCB.

[22]  J. Thornton,et al.  Shape variation in protein binding pockets and their ligands. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  R. Mann,et al.  The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition , 2009, Nature.

[24]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  C Sander,et al.  Mapping the Protein Universe , 1996, Science.

[26]  Jie Liang,et al.  Structural signatures of enzyme binding pockets from order-independent surface alignment: a study of metalloendopeptidase and NAD binding proteins. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  B. Honig,et al.  Free energy determinants of secondary structure formation: III. beta-turns and their role in protein folding. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  P E Bourne,et al.  Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. , 1998, Protein engineering.

[29]  David W. Ritchie,et al.  Fast computation, rotation, and comparison of low resolution spherical harmonic molecular surfaces , 1999, Journal of Computational Chemistry.

[30]  H. Nakamura,et al.  Roles of electrostatic interaction in proteins , 1996, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[31]  E. Catmull,et al.  A CLASS OF LOCAL INTERPOLATING SPLINES , 1974 .

[32]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Recognition of Binding Patterns Common to a Set of Protein Structures , 2005, RECOMB.

[33]  Lydia E. Kavraki,et al.  The MASH Pipeline for Protein Function Prediction and an Algorithm for the Geometric Refinement of 3D Motifs , 2007, J. Comput. Biol..

[34]  R. Laskowski.  SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. , 1995, Journal of molecular graphics.

[35]  K. Kinoshita,et al.  Identification of the ligand binding sites on the molecular surface of proteins , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[36]  M. L. Connolly.  Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. , 1983, Science.

[37]  J F Gibrat,et al.  Surprising similarities in structure comparison. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[38]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Simulation of the diffusion‐controlled reaction between superoxide and superoxide dismutase. II. Detailed models , 1985, Biopolymers.

[39]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Molecular shape comparisons in searches for active sites and functional similarity. , 1998, Protein engineering.

[40]  Vincent B. Chen,et al.  Correspondence e-mail: , 2000 .

[41]  J A McCammon,et al.  Simulation of the diffusion‐controlled reaction between superoxide and superoxide dismutase. I. Simple models , 1985, Biopolymers.

[42]  Brian Yuan Chen,et al.  VASP-S: A Volumetric Analysis and Statistical Model for Predicting Steric Influences on Protein-Ligand Binding Specificity , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine.

[43]  W. Kabsch.  A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors , 1978 .

[44]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Optimization of electrostatic binding free energy , 1997 .

[45]  N. K. Rogers,et al.  The modelling of electrostatic interactions in the function of globular proteins. , 1986, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[46]  B. Honig,et al.  Free energy determinants of secondary structure formation: I. alpha-Helices. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  Szymon Rusinkiewicz,et al.  Rotation Invariant Spherical Harmonic Representation of 3D Shape Descriptors , 2003, Symposium on Geometry Processing.

[48]  P. S. Kim,et al.  Mechanism of specificity in the Fos-Jun oncoprotein heterodimer , 1992, Cell.

[49]  B Honig,et al.  Electrical potentials in trypsin isozymes. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[50]  Barry Honig,et al.  VASP: A Volumetric Analysis of Surface Properties Yields Insights into Protein-Ligand Binding Specificity , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[51]  Xiang-Jun Lu,et al.  Web 3DNA—a web server for the analysis, reconstruction, and visualization of three-dimensional nucleic-acid structures , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[52]  R. Chauvin,et al.  Explicit periodic trend of van der Waals radii , 1992 .

[53]  Andrzej Joachimiak,et al.  Protein Functional Surfaces: Global Shape Matching and Local Spatial Alignments of Ligand Binding Sites , 2008, BMC Structural Biology.

[54]  Lydia E. Kavraki,et al.  Algorithms for Structural Comparison and Statistical Analysis of 3D Protein Motifs , 2004, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[55]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[56]  B. Honig,et al.  Electrostatic interactions in membranes and proteins. , 1986, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[57]  J. Richardson,et al.  Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[58]  Peter A. Kollman,et al.  Electrostatic recognition between superoxide and copper, zinc superoxide dismutase , 1983, Nature.

[59]  A Tropsha,et al.  Energetic decomposition of the alpha-helix-coil equilibrium of a dynamic model system. , 1996, Biopolymers.

[60]  L Szilágyi,et al.  Electrostatic complementarity within the substrate-binding pocket of trypsin. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  Lei Xie,et al.  Detecting evolutionary relationships across existing fold space, using sequence order-independent profile–profile alignments , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  S. McLaughlin,et al.  The electrostatic properties of membranes. , 1989, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[63]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Electrostatic Complementarity at Ligand Binding Sites: Application to Chorismate Mutase , 2001 .

[64]  J. B. Matthew.  Electrostatic effects in proteins. , 1985, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[65]  Kengo Kinoshita,et al.  Protein informatics towards function identification. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[66]  T. Lohman,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of ion effects on the binding and conformational equilibria of proteins and nucleic acids: the roles of ion association or release, screening, and ion effects on water activity , 1978, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[67]  Fabio Polticelli,et al.  Structural determinants of trypsin affinity and specificity for cationic inhibitors , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.