The Visual Discrimination of Bending

The sensitivity of observers to nonrigid bending was evaluated in two experiments. In both experiments, observers were required to discriminate on any given trial which of two bending rods was more elastic. In experiment 1, both rods bent within the same oriented plane, and bent either in a frontoparallel plane or bent in depth. In experiment 2, the two rods within any given trial bent in different, randomly chosen orientations in depth. The results of both experiments revealed that human observers are sensitive to, and can reliably detect, relatively small differences in bending (the average Weber fraction across experiments 1 and 2 was 9.0%). The performance of the human observers was compared to that of models that based their elasticity judgments upon either static projected curvature or mean and maximal projected speed. Despite the fact that all of the observers reported compelling 3-D perceptions of bending in depth, their judgments were both qualitatively and quantitatively consistent with the performance of the models. This similarity suggests that relatively straightforward information about the elasticity of simple bending objects is available in projected retinal images.

[1]  G Johansson,et al.  Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception , 1976, Psychological research.

[2]  J. N. Bassili.  Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  J S Tittle,et al.  The visual perception of three-dimensional length. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  G Jansson,et al.  Perceived Bending Motions from a Quadrangle Changing Form , 1977, Perception.

[5]  W H Warren,et al.  The Way the Ball Bounces: Visual and Auditory Perception of Elasticity and Control of the Bounce Pass , 1987, Perception.

[6]  J. Todd.  Visual information about rigid and nonrigid motion: a geometric analysis. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  G Jansson.  Perceived bending and stretching motions from a line of points. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[8]  James T. Todd,et al.  The perception of globally coherent motion , 1992, Vision Research.

[9]  H. Wallach,et al.  The kinetic depth effect. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  J. Aloimonos,et al.  On the kinetic depth effect , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  Joseph S. Lappin,et al.  Computer-controlled displays of bending motions , 1986 .

[12]  J T Todd,et al.  The perception of three-dimensional structure from rigid and nonrigid motion , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  B. Green.  Figure coherence in the kinetic depth effect. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  J. Norman,et al.  Aging and the perception of biological motion. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[15]  M. Braunstein.  Depth perception in rotating dot patterns: effects of numerosity and perspective. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  J T Todd,et al.  The Discriminability of Local Surface Structure , 1996, Perception.

[17]  Hans Wallach.  Über visuell wahrgenommene Bewegungsrichtung , 1935 .

[18]  E. Adelson,et al.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns , 1982, Nature.

[19]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Depth and shape from differential perspective in the presence of bending deformations. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[20]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Blowing in the wind: Perceiving structure in trees and bushes , 1982, Cognition.

[21]  J F Norman,et al.  The Detectability of Geometric Structure in Rapidly Changing Optical Patterns , 1991, Perception.

[22]  J T Todd,et al.  Stereoscopic Discrimination of Interval and Ordinal Depth Relations on Smooth Surfaces and in Empty Space , 1998, Perception.

[23]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  The perception of biological motion across apertures , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  Interpolated elastic structure from the motion of dots , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  G. Johansson,et al.  Visual bridgingof empty gaps in the optic flow , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  J F Norman,et al.  The detection of surface curvatures defined by optical motion , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Recognition of Point-Light Biological Motion Displays by Young Children , 2001, Perception.

[28]  W. Metzger.  Beobachtungen über phänomenale Identität , 1934 .

[29]  J T Todd,et al.  The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  A. Ishiguchi.  The effect of orientation on interpolated elastic structure from dot motion: Its occurrence and persistence , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  C Caudek,et al.  Misperceptions of angular velocities influence the perception of rigidity in the kinetic depth effect. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Hideko F. Norman,et al.  Visual discrimination of local surface structure: Slant, tilt, and curvedness , 2006, Vision Research.

[33]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[34]  Green Bf.  Figure coherence in the kinetic depth effect. , 1961 .

[35]  G. Johansson,et al.  Visual Perception of Bending Motion , 1973, Perception.

[36]  J T Todd,et al.  The Visual Discrimination of Relative Surface Orientation , 1995, Perception.

[37]  J T Todd,et al.  Perception of rigid motion in depth from the optical deformations of shadows and occlusion boundaries. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  J T Todd,et al.  Apparent rotation in three-dimensional space: Effects of temporal, spatial, and structural factors , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.