Systematic investigation of the signal properties of polycrystalline HgI2 detectors under mammographic, radiographic, fluoroscopic and radiotherapy irradiation conditions

The signal properties of polycrystalline mercuric iodide (HgI2) film detectors, under irradiation conditions relevant to mammographic, radiographic, fluoroscopic and radiotherapy x-ray imaging, are reported. Each film detector consists of an approximately 230 to approximately 460 microm thick layer of HgI2 (fabricated through physical vapour deposition or a screen-print process) and a thin barrier layer, sandwiched between a pair of opposing electrode plates. The high atomic number, high density and low effective ionization energy, W(EFF), of HgI2 make it an attractive candidate for significantly improving the performance of active matrix, flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for several x-ray imaging applications. The temporal behaviour of current from the film detectors in the presence and in the absence of radiation was used to examine dark current levels, the lag and reciprocity of the signal response, x-ray sensitivity and W(EFF). The results are discussed in the context of present AMFPI performance. This study provides performance data for a wide range of potential medical x-ray imaging applications from a single set of detectors and represents the first investigation of the signal properties of polycrystalline mercuric iodide for the radiotherapy application.

[1]  A. Friant,et al.  I(t), I(V) and surface effect studies of vapor grown and solution grown HgI2 detectors , 1989 .

[2]  John G. Simmons,et al.  Poole-Frenkel Effect and Schottky Effect in Metal-Insulator-Metal Systems , 1967 .

[3]  M. Schieber,et al.  Near single-crystal electrical properties of polycrystalline HgI/sub 2/ produced by physical vapor deposition , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[4]  D. Jaffray,et al.  A ghost story: spatio-temporal response characteristics of an indirect-detection flat-panel imager. , 1999, Medical physics.

[5]  Kanai S. Shah,et al.  Electronic transport in polycrystalline Pbl2 films , 1999 .

[6]  Larry Partain,et al.  Mercuric iodide medical imagers for low-exposure radiography and fluoroscopy , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  Takayuki Tomisaki,et al.  Clinical performance of a 14-in. x 14-in. real-time amorphous selenium flat-panel detector , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[8]  J. Rowlands,et al.  Development of high quantum efficiency, flat panel, thick detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging: a novel direct-conversion design and its feasibility. , 2004, Medical physics.

[9]  Robert A. Street,et al.  Mercuric iodide thick films for radiological x-ray detectors , 2000, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[10]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging with amorphous selenium: theoretical feasibility of the liquid crystal light valve for radiography. , 1997, Medical physics.

[11]  S. Shalev,et al.  Grooved phosphor screens for on-line portal imaging. , 1993, Medical physics.

[12]  L. Antonuk,et al.  Additive noise properties of active matrix flat-panel imagers. , 2000, Medical physics.

[13]  Katsumi Suzuki,et al.  Development and evaluation of a digital subtraction angiography system using a large-area flat panel detector , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[14]  Yi Wang,et al.  Evaluation of novel direct- and indirect-detection active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for mammography , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[16]  L.E. Antonuk,et al.  Examination of PbI/sub 2/ and HgI/sub 2/ photoconductive materials for direct detection, active matrix, flat-panel imagers for diagnostic X-ray imaging , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[17]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. , 2003, Medical physics.

[18]  K. Hecht.  Zum Mechanismus des lichtelektrischen Primärstromes in isolierenden Kristallen , 1932 .

[19]  J Yorkston,et al.  Empirical investigation of the signal performance of a high-resolution, indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) for fluoroscopic and radiographic operation. , 1997, Medical physics.

[20]  Robert A. Street,et al.  Nondestructive imaging with mercuric iodide thick film x-ray detectors , 2001, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[21]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  a-Si:H TFT-Based Active Matrix Flat-Panel Imagers For Medical X-Ray Applications , 2004 .

[22]  Edward J. Hoffman,et al.  Mercuric iodide polycrystalline films , 2001, Optics + Photonics.

[23]  Robert A. Street,et al.  Technology and Applications of Amorphous Silicon , 2000 .

[24]  Qihua Zhao,et al.  Segmented phosphors: MEMS-based high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging. , 2005, Medical physics.

[25]  Haim Hermon,et al.  High-flux x-ray response of composite mercuric iodide detectors , 1999, Optics & Photonics.

[26]  J. Boone,et al.  An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV. , 1997, Medical physics.

[27]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Strategies to improve the signal and noise performance of active matrix, flat-panel imagers for diagnostic x-ray applications. , 2000, Medical physics.

[28]  Kenkichi Tanioka,et al.  Indirect flat-panel detector with avalanche gain , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[29]  Kanai S. Shah,et al.  Mercuric iodide and lead iodide x-ray detectors for radiographic and fluoroscopic medical imaging , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[30]  J. Frenkel,et al.  On Pre-Breakdown Phenomena in Insulators and Electronic Semi-Conductors , 1938 .

[31]  S Suryanarayanan,et al.  Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. , 2000, Medical physics.

[32]  Douglas Albagli,et al.  Performance of a flat-panel cardiac detector , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[33]  T. R. Fewell,et al.  Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography. , 1997, Medical physics.

[34]  L. Antonuk.  Electronic portal imaging devices: a review and historical perspective of contemporary technologies and research. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  H. Zeman,et al.  Theoretical analysis and experimental evaluation of a Csl(TI) based electronic portal imaging system. , 2002, Medical physics.

[36]  D. Rogers,et al.  Structure and Operation of the EGS4 Code System , 1988 .

[37]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: feasibility of a flat panel self-scanned detector for digital radiology. , 1995, Medical physics.

[38]  Martin J Butson,et al.  Multilayer Gafchromic film detectors for breast skin dose determination in vivo. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  Yi Wang,et al.  Systematic development of input-quantum-limited fluoroscopic imagers based on active-matrix flat-panel technology , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[40]  Yi Wang,et al.  Examination of HgI2 and PbI2 photoconductive materials for direct detection, active matrix, flat-panel imagers for diagnostic x-ray imaging , 2003 .

[41]  A Fenster,et al.  Monte Carlo studies of x-ray energy absorption and quantum noise in megavoltage transmission radiography. , 1995, Medical physics.

[42]  Isaias D. Job,et al.  40 x 30 cm flat-panel imager for angiography, R&F, and cone-beam CT applications , 2001 .

[43]  Carlo Tognina,et al.  Megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography using a high-efficiency image receptor. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[44]  L. Antonuk,et al.  Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of a prototype, megavoltage indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imager. , 2001, Medical physics.

[45]  Michael G Herman,et al.  Electronic and film portal images: a comparison of landmark visibility and review accuracy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[46]  P. Evans,et al.  Optimization of the scintillation detector in a combined 3D megavoltage CT scanner and portal imager. , 1998, Medical physics.

[47]  D. Sheikh-Bagheri,et al.  Monte Carlo study of photon beams from medical linear accelerators: Optimization, benchmark and spectra , 1999 .

[48]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Radiation response of amorphous silicon imaging arrays at diagnostic energies , 1994 .

[49]  M P Capp.  Radiological imaging--2000 A.D. , 1982, The Canadian journal of radiography, radiotherapy, nuclear medicine.

[50]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Characterization of a direct full-field flat-panel digital mammography detector , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[51]  Kanai S. Shah,et al.  Comparison of PbI2 and HgI2 for direct detection active matrix x-ray image sensors , 2002 .

[52]  Robert A. Street,et al.  Medical imaging with mercuric iodide direct digital radiography flat-panel x-ray detectors , 2003, SPIE Optics + Photonics.