A case study on occupational back-support exoskeletons versatility in lifting and carrying

To prevent workers performing manual material handling from developing musculoskeletal disorders, occupational back-support exoskeletons are becoming more and more common in industrial scenarios. However, while their beneficial effects on weight lifting tasks are known, additional work is still needed to make them effective in assisting - or at least not hindering - other types of tasks, such as carrying. Therefore, the work presented here studies the effects that varying the assistive strategy according to the performed task, namely exoskeleton versatility, has on the efficacy and the dynamic fit of these devices. After presenting relevant metrics for this analysis, an exemplification of a single-subject case study is detailed. In this study XoTrunk, a back-support exoskeleton, is used to provide assistance during the execution of a complex task involving both lifting and carrying. Results show that exploiting versatility, the control strategy appears to be more natural and respectful of the subject’s movements.

[1]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  Systematic framework for performance evaluation of exoskeleton actuators , 2020, Wearable Technologies.

[2]  A Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[3]  Idsart Kingma,et al.  Effects of a passive exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low back in static holding tasks. , 2019, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Linda Shore,et al.  Exoscore: A Design Tool to Evaluate Factors Associated With Technology Acceptance of Soft Lower Limb Exosuits by Older Adults , 2020, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Luigi Monica,et al.  Back-Support Exoskeletons for Occupational Use: An Overview of Technological Advances and Trends , 2019, IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors.

[6]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  Assessment of an On-board Classifier for Activity Recognition on an Active Back-Support Exoskeleton , 2019, 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[7]  Andrea Maria Zanchettin,et al.  Collaborative Robots in the Workplace [From the Guest Editors] , 2018, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[8]  Kevin Desbrosses,et al.  Occupational Exoskeletons: Overview of Their Benefits and Limitations in Preventing Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders , 2019, IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors.

[9]  Arun Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH Equation for Manual Lifting: A Method for Job Evaluation , 1995, AAOHN journal : official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses.

[10]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  Rationale, Implementation and Evaluation of Assistive Strategies for an Active Back-Support Exoskeleton , 2018, Front. Robot. AI.

[11]  Lorenzo Grazi,et al.  A Real-Time Lift Detection Strategy for a Hip Exoskeleton , 2018, Front. Neurorobot..

[12]  Hyeg Joo Choi,et al.  Static, Dynamic, and Cognitive Fit of Exosystems for the Human Operator , 2020, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  Enhancing Back-Support Exoskeleton Versatility based on Human Activity Recognition , 2019, 2019 Wearable Robotics Association Conference (WearRAcon).

[14]  Lorenzo Grazi,et al.  Towards methodology and metrics for assessing lumbar exoskeletons in industrial applications , 2019, 2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT).

[15]  D B Chaffin,et al.  A computerized biomechanical model-development of and use in studying gross body actions. , 1969, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Jan Babič,et al.  Gaussian Mixture Models for Control of Quasi-Passive Spinal Exoskeletons , 2020, Sensors.

[17]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  Applicability of an Active Back-Support Exoskeleton to Carrying Activities , 2020, Frontiers in Robotics and AI.

[18]  B Jonsson,et al.  Measurement and evaluation of local muscular strain in the shoulder during constrained work. , 1982, Journal of human ergology.

[19]  Frank Krause,et al.  Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load , 2016, Ergonomics.

[20]  H. Houdijk,et al.  The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on functional performance in healthy individuals. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[21]  E. De Momi,et al.  Subjective Assessment of Occupational Exoskeletons: Feasibility Study for a Custom Survey for Braces , 2020, Biosystems & Biorobotics.

[22]  Jesus Ortiz,et al.  Exoskeleton kinematic design robustness: An assessment method to account for human variability , 2020, Wearable Technologies.