Guaranteed sensor coverage with the weighted-$D^2$ sampling

In this paper we focus on the mobile sensor coverage problem formulated as a continuous locational optimization problem. Cort\`es et al. first proposed a distributed version of the Lloyd descent algorithm with guaranteed convergence to a local optima. Since then researchers have studied a number of variations of the coverage problem. The quality of the final solution with the Lloyd descent depends on the initial sensor configuration. Inspired by the recent results on a related $k$-means problem, in this paper we propose the weighted-$D^2$ sampling to choose the initial sensor configuration and show that it yields $O(\log k)$-competitive sensor coverage before even applying the Lloyd descent. Through extensive numerical simulations, we show that the initial coverage with the weighted-$D^2$ sampling is significantly lower than that with the uniform random initial sensor configuration. We also show that the average distance traveled by the sensors to reach the final configuration through the Lloyd descent is also significantly lower than that with the uniform random configuration. This also implies considerable savings in the energy spent by the sensors during motion and faster convergence.

[1]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Energy-aware coverage control with docking for robot teams , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  Sergei Vassilvitskii,et al.  k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding , 2007, SODA '07.

[3]  Atsuo Suzuki,et al.  Locational optimization problems solved through Voronoi diagrams , 1997 .

[4]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Distributed coverage control for mobile sensors with location-dependent sensing models , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Mac Schwager,et al.  Distributed Coverage Control with Sensory Feedback for Networked Robots , 2006, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[6]  Sonia Martínez,et al.  Energy-balancing cooperative strategies for sensor deployment , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[7]  M. A. Dahleh,et al.  Constraints on locational optimization problems , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[8]  Sonia Martínez,et al.  Coverage control for mobile sensing networks , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Francesco Bullo,et al.  Esaim: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations Spatially-distributed Coverage Optimization and Control with Limited-range Interactions , 2022 .

[10]  Joseph S. B. Mitchell,et al.  On the continuous Weber and k-median problems (extended abstract) , 2000, SCG '00.

[11]  Kamal Youcef-Toumi,et al.  Optimal coverage of an infrastructure network using sensors with distance-decaying sensing quality , 2013, Autom..

[12]  Mac Schwager,et al.  Decentralized, Adaptive Coverage Control for Networked Robots , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..