Movement time and guidance accuracy in teleoperation of robotic vehicles

Abstract Two experiments are reported on the steering of a tracked vehicle through straight-line courses and corners to determine the relationships between movement time and control accuracy with the geometry of the course, such as the vehicle width, the track width and the type of corner. For straight line tracking, Drury’s law in which movement time (MT) is linear with the tracking task difficulty measure [A/(W − d)] is found to hold, where A is the distance traveled, ‘W’ is the track width and ‘d’ is the vehicle width. Performance in three types of corners (right angle, cut angle and circular) varied little, with the most important factor being the clearance (W − d) available to the operator. Collisions with boundary walls were also highly related to this factor. The reported research has strong relevance to the training of operators for urban search and rescue robots. Practitioner summary: Data for steering a real vehicle in a simulated environment of straight paths and different corner geometries showed that Drury’s law holds for straight line tracking and the clearance between the widths of vehicle and track is important in steering corners. Data show clear need for training of USAR (Urban Search and Rescue) operators.

[1]  Keith S. Jones,et al.  Do Tele-Operators Learn to Better Judge Whether a Robot Can Pass Through an Aperture? , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[2]  N. Rashevsky,et al.  Some remarks on the mathematical aspects of automobile driving , 1959 .

[3]  Lei Liu,et al.  The Effect of Varying Path Properties in Path Steering Tasks , 2010, EGVE/EuroVR/VEC.

[4]  Keith S. Jones,et al.  Tele-operation Training , 2014 .

[5]  Daniela López De Luise,et al.  Performance Evaluation for Autonomous Mobile Robots , 2013, ICAART.

[6]  C G Drury,et al.  Movements with lateral constraint. , 1971, Ergonomics.

[7]  William S. Helton,et al.  Cornering Law , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[8]  Errol R. Hoffmann,et al.  Review of models for restricted-path movements , 2009 .

[9]  Robert Pastel,et al.  Measuring the difficulty of steering through corners , 2006, CHI.

[10]  Bob G. Witmer,et al.  Judging Perceived and Traversed Distance in Virtual Environments , 1998, Presence.

[11]  Adam Jacoff,et al.  Performance standards for urban search and rescue robots , 2006, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[12]  Howie Choset,et al.  Survey on Urban Search and Rescue Robots , 2004 .

[13]  Adam Jacoff,et al.  Urban search and rescue robot performance standards: progress update , 2007, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[14]  Brian R. Johnson,et al.  Teleoperation Through Apertures , 2011 .

[15]  Keith S. Jones,et al.  Tele-Operating USAR Robots , 2015 .

[16]  N. Rashevsky Mathematical biophysics of automobile driving , 1959 .

[17]  Douglas J. Gillan,et al.  Using Temporal Sensitivity to Predict Performance Under Latency in Teleoperation , 2018, Hum. Factors.

[18]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Human movement performance in relation to path constraint - the law of steering in locomotion , 2003, IEEE Virtual Reality, 2003. Proceedings..

[19]  J. Tittle,et al.  The Remote Perception Problem , 2002 .

[20]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[21]  Jesse M. Heines,et al.  The Difficulty of Remotely Negotiating Corners , 2007 .

[22]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Beyond Fitts' law: models for trajectory-based HCI tasks , 1997, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[23]  Dawn M. Tilbury,et al.  A New Difficulty Index for Teleoperated Robots Driving through Obstacles , 2018, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[24]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Human-robot interactions during the robot-assisted urban search and rescue response at the World Trade Center , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[25]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Trial by fire [rescue robots] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[26]  Christopher C. Pagano,et al.  Perception of Robot Passability With Direct Line of Sight and Teleoperation , 2009, Hum. Factors.