The emerging pedagogy of MOOCs, the educational design of technology and practices of study

During the last years, MOOCs (massive open online courses) are part of the most discussed developments in educational technology. MOOCs swept the landscape of educational technology in no time. However, through all this enthusiasm, it is difficult to see the contribution of MOOCs to computer-based education. Even though there is a surge in MOOCs as well as in MOOC-research, it is unclear how an effective MOOC-pedagogy can be developed. What is this MOOC-phenomenon? And how can we, as educators, teachers, pedagogues, educational researchers, develop MOOC-pedagogy? In the first part of this paper, we’ll start with an overview of the MOOC-phenomenon. In the second part, we’ll discuss the implicit philosophical attitudes towards educational technology that underlies much of the MOOC-debates. We then argue that, rather than a theoretically grounded approach to educational technology, common sense attitudes of essentialism and instrumentalism prevail. In the last part of the paper, we suggest to concentrate on the educational design of technology and on the development of practices of study necessary to deal with technology, in order to develop a meaningful educational practice.

[1]  R. Clark.  Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[2]  C. Osvaldo Rodriguez,et al.  MOOCs and the AI-Stanford Like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses. , 2012 .

[3]  N. K. Hayles.  Hyper and Deep Attention: The Generational Divide in Cognitive Modes , 2007 .

[4]  A. Jaillet.  Les films promoteurs de MOOC, une rhétorique de la "divisio" , 2014 .

[5]  Jolie Kennedy,et al.  Characteristics of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): A Research Review, 2009-2012. , 2014 .

[6]  Cathy Sandeen.  Integrating MOOCS into Traditional Higher Education: The Emerging “MOOC 3.0” Era , 2013 .

[7]  M. Weller.  MOOCs and the Silicon Valley Narrative. , 2015 .

[8]  George Siemens,et al.  What public media reveals about MOOCs: A systematic analysis of news reports , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[9]  Kant Avec Ferry: Some Thoughts on Bernard Stiegler's Prendre Soin: I. de La Jeunesse Et Des Générations (Paris: Flammarion, 2008) , 2010 .

[10]  Maureen Ebben,et al.  Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: a review of nascent MOOC scholarship , 2014 .

[11]  Kris D. Gutiérrez,et al.  Connected Learning: An Agenda for Research and Design , 2013 .

[12]  José-Andrés Martínez-Silva,et al.  Literatura y práctica: una revisión crítica acerca de los MOOC Literature and Practice: A Critical Review of MOOCs , 2015 .

[13]  Amit Chauhan,et al.  Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS): Emerging Trends in Assessment and Accreditation , 2014 .

[14]  Barbara Means,et al.  Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies , 2009 .

[15]  Rolien Susanne Hoyng.  Popping Up and Fading Out: Participatory Networks and Istanbul’s Creative City Project , 2012 .

[16]  Joseph Jay Williams,et al.  HarvardX and MITx: Two Years of Open Online Courses Fall 2012-Summer 2014 , 2015 .

[17]  Salman Khan,et al.  The One World Schoolhouse: Education Reimagined , 2012 .

[18]  Siân Bayne.  What's the matter with ‘technology-enhanced learning’? , 2015 .

[19]  C. Sinclair,et al.  Teacher Experiences and Academic Identity: The Missing Components of MOOC Pedagogy , 2014 .

[20]  Nishikant Sonwalkar,et al.  The First Adaptive MOOC: A Case Study on Pedagogy Framework and Scalable Cloud Architecture—Part I , 2013 .

[21]  L. Gourlay.  Open education as a ‘heterotopia of desire’ , 2015 .

[22]  Evgeny Morozov,et al.  Book review: To save everything click here: the folly of technological solutionism , 2013 .

[23]  M. Altamirano.  Three Concepts for Crossing the Nature-Artifice Divide: Technology, Milieu, and Machine , 2014 .

[24]  Jane Sinclair,et al.  Dropout rates of massive open online courses : behavioural patterns , 2014 .

[25]  Francesco Avvisati.  Students, computers and learning : making the connection , 2015 .

[26]  Ulrik Schroeder,et al.  MOOCs - A Review of the State-of-the-Art , 2014, CSEDU.

[27]  Robert Schuwer,et al.  Institutional MOOC strategies in Europe , 2015 .

[28]  Manuela Raposo Rivas,et al.  Un estudio sobre los componentes pedagógicos de los cursos online masivos , 2015 .

[29]  George Siemens.  Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[30]  Serge Garlatti,et al.  Le concept de iMOOC pour une ouverture maîtrisée , 2013 .

[31]  John Hattie,et al.  Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement , 2008 .

[32]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Roles of Course Facilitators, Learners, and Technology in the Flow of Information of a CMOOC , 2015 .

[33]  M. Simons,et al.  Education in times of fast learning: the future of the school , 2015, Old and New Generations in the 21st Century.

[34]  E-learning. Trends en ontwikkelingen , 2013 .

[35]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[36]  D. Wiley,et al.  Dramatically Bringing down the Cost of Education with OER: How Open Education Resources Unlock the Door to Free Learning. , 2012 .

[37]  Lindsie Schoenack.  A New Framework for Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). , 2013 .

[38]  Norm Friesen,et al.  Online Education: A Science and Technology Studies Perspective / Éducation en ligne: Perspective des études en science et technologie , 2013 .

[39]  Rita Kop,et al.  The Challenges to Connectivist Learning on Open Online Networks: Learning Experiences during a Massive Open Online Course , 2011 .

[40]  Bonnie Stewart,et al.  Massiveness + Openness = New Literacies of Participation? , 2013 .

[41]  Siân Bayne.  Teacherbot: interventions in automated teaching , 2015, Apertura.

[42]  George Veletsianos,et al.  Digging deeper into learners' experiences in MOOCs: Participation in social networks outside of MOOCs, notetaking and contexts surrounding content consumption , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[43]  N. Katherine Hayles,et al.  How We Read: Close, Hyper, Machine , 2010 .

[44]  Nathaniel Ostashewski,et al.  Delivering a MOOC using a social networking site: The SMOOC design model , 2012 .

[45]  Justin Reich,et al.  HarvardX and MITx: The First Year of Open Online Courses, Fall 2012-Summer 2013 , 2014 .

[46]  Manuela Raposo-Rivas,et al.  Un estudio sobre los componentes pedagógicos de los cursos online masivos = A Study on the Pedagogical Components of Massive Online Courses , 2015 .

[47]  George Siemens,et al.  Learning Analytics , 2013 .

[48]  Rolf Schulmeister.  The Position of xMOOCs in Educational Systems , 2014 .

[49]  P. Crogan,et al.  PAYING ATTENTION: TOWARDS A CRITIQUE OF THE ATTENTION ECONOMY , 2012 .

[50]  N. Selwyn,et al.  Massive Open Online Change? Exploring the Discursive Construction of the "MOOC" in Newspapers. , 2015 .

[51]  Michael C. Behrent.  Foucault and Technology , 2013 .

[52]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[53]  George Siemens,et al.  Preparing for the Digital University: A Review of the History and Current State of Distance, Blended and Online Learning , 2015 .

[54]  Genevieve Marie Johnson.  Using Tablet Computers with Elementary School Students with Special Needs: The Practices and Perceptions of Special Education Teachers and Teacher Assistants , 2013 .