Information Connections among Multiple Investors: Evolutionary Local Patterns Revealed by Motifs

The concept of motifs provides a fresh perspective for studying local patterns, which is useful for understanding the essence of a network structure. However, few previous studies have focused on the evolutionary characteristics of weighted motifs while further considering participants’ differences. We study how information connections differ among multiple investors. The evolutionary 10-year trend of weighted 3-motifs in China’s energy stock markets is explored for the networks of co-holding behaviors among shareholders, who are classified as companies, funds and individuals. Our works allow us to detect the preferential local patterns distributed among different agents as their fluctuate involvement in networks. We find that the diversity of shareholders contributes to the statistical significance of local patterns, while homophily always exist among individuals. Modules of information connections are stable among reserved investors, which is especially apparent among companies. Individuals prefer to keep their connections with companies and funds. Unsteady modules happen owing to strengthen links among funds during the time that they are main participants in stock markets. More details about multiple investors informationally connected in evolutionary local patterns can be detected by our work.

[1]  Li Xiang,et al.  The study of network motifs induced from discrete time series , 2010 .

[2]  Lili Chen,et al.  Stock price fluctuation under asymmetric information , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS).

[3]  Brad M. Barber,et al.  Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors , 2000 .

[4]  Richard Fu,et al.  Geography, Informal Information Flows and Mutual Fund Portfolios: Informal Information Flows and Mutual Fund Portfolios , 2014 .

[5]  Diego Garlaschelli,et al.  Triadic motifs and dyadic self-organization in the World Trade Network , 2012, IWSOS.

[6]  Ee-Peng Lim,et al.  Influentials, Novelty, and Social Contagion: The Viral Power of Average Friends, Close Communities, and Old News , 2012, Soc. Networks.

[7]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Superfamilies of Evolved and Designed Networks , 2004, Science.

[8]  Lachezar Aleksandrov Krumov,et al.  Local structures determine performance within complex networks , 2010 .

[9]  Bing Han,et al.  Social Networks, Information Acquisition, and Asset Prices , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[11]  Fei Wu,et al.  Investor heterogeneity and commonality in stock return and liquidity , 2015 .

[12]  William Bialek,et al.  Mapping the stereotyped behaviour of freely moving fruit flies , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[13]  K. Kaski,et al.  Intensity and coherence of motifs in weighted complex networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Tao Zhou,et al.  Link prediction in weighted networks: The role of weak ties , 2010 .

[15]  L. da F. Costa,et al.  Characterization of complex networks: A survey of measurements , 2005, cond-mat/0505185.

[16]  Scott E. Yonker,et al.  The People in Your Neighborhood: Social Interactions and Mutual Fund Portfolios , 2013 .

[17]  Terrance Odean,et al.  The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors , 1998 .

[18]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Xiao Fan Liu,et al.  The Anatomy of the Global Football Player Transfer Network: Club Functionalities versus Network Properties , 2016, PloS one.

[20]  Aurélien Naldi,et al.  The combination of the functionalities of feedback circuits is determinant for the attractors’ number and size in pathway-like Boolean networks , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Yuri Kozitsky,et al.  Motif based hierarchical random graphs: structural properties and critical points of an Ising model , 2011, ArXiv.

[22]  Huajiao Li,et al.  The evolutionary stability of shareholders’ co-holding behavior for China’s listed energy companies based on associated maximal connected sub-graphs of derivative holding-based networks☆ , 2016 .

[23]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[24]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[25]  Ankur Pareek Information Networks: Implications for Mutual Fund Trading Behavior and Stock Returns , 2012 .

[26]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[27]  Lucas Antiqueira,et al.  Characterization of subgraph relationships and distribution in complex networks , 2008, 0807.2875.

[28]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[29]  Vincent Buskens,et al.  9. A New Model for Information Diffusion in Heterogeneous Social Networks , 1999 .

[30]  Edwin R. Hancock,et al.  Analyzing graph time series using a generative model , 2016, 2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR).

[31]  Janet Wiles,et al.  Developmental motifs reveal complex structure in cell lineages , 2011, Complex..

[32]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[33]  Tim S Evans,et al.  How the network properties of shareholders vary with investor type and country , 2019, PloS one.

[34]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[35]  Rosario N. Mantegna,et al.  Statistically validated mobile communication networks: the evolution of motifs in European and Chinese data , 2014, ArXiv.

[36]  高湘昀,et al.  Correlation of the holding behaviour of the holding-based network of Chinese fund management companies based on the node top ological characteristics , 2014 .

[37]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Cartography of complex networks: modules and universal roles , 2005, Journal of statistical mechanics.

[38]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Learning structural SVMs with latent variables , 2009, ICML '09.

[39]  Johan Walden,et al.  Investor Networks in the Stock Market , 2011 .

[40]  Carolyn R. Bertozzi,et al.  Methods and Applications , 2009 .

[41]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Motifs in weighted networks and their Hirsch subgraphs , 2016 .

[42]  Wei Li,et al.  Individual and Institutional Investors’ Response to Earnings Reported by Conservative and Non‐Conservative Firms: Evidence from Chinese Financial Markets , 2016 .

[43]  Scott E. Yonker,et al.  The People in Your Neighborhood: Social Interactions and Mutual Fund Portfolios: Social Interactions and Mutual Fund Portfolios , 2015 .

[44]  C. Chung,et al.  Short-term trading by individual investors in the Korean stock market , 2016 .

[45]  Huajiao Li,et al.  The shareholding similarity of the shareholders of the worldwide listed energy companies based on a two-mode primitive network and a one-mode derivative holding-based network , 2014 .

[46]  Chao Wang,et al.  Purchase and Redemption Prediction Based on Multi-task Gaussian Process and Dimensionality Reduction , 2016, APWeb.

[47]  Pawel Dabrowski-Tumanski,et al.  Complex lasso: new entangled motifs in proteins , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[48]  Richard Fu,et al.  Geography, Informal Information Flows and Mutual Fund Portfolios , 2010 .

[49]  Han Chuanfeng Motif and Superfamily in National Critical Transportation Networks , 2013 .

[50]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Temporal motifs reveal homophily, gender-specific patterns, and group talk in call sequences , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Jeffrey D. Kubik,et al.  Thy Neighbor's Portfolio: Word-of-Mouth Effects in the Holdings and Trades of Money Managers , 2003 .

[52]  Zuntao Fu,et al.  Quantifying distinct associations on different temporal scales: comparison of DCCA and Pearson methods , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[53]  Nataša Pržulj,et al.  Graphlet-based Characterization of Directed Networks , 2016, Scientific Reports.