Heterogeneous mobile sensor net deployment using robot herding and line-of-sight formations

This paper presents an approach for deploying a team of mobile sensor nodes to form a sensor network in indoor environments. The challenge in this work is that the mobile sensor nodes have no ability for localization or obstacle avoidance. Thus, our approach entails the use of more capable "helper" robots that "herd" the mobile sensor nodes into their deployment positions. To extensively explore the issues of heterogeneity in multi-robot teams, we employ the use of two types of helper robots-one that acts as a leader and a second that: 1) acts as a follower and 2) autonomously teleoperates the mobile sensor nodes. Due to limited sensing capabilities, neither of these helper robots can herd the mobile sensor nodes alone; instead, our approach enables the team as a whole to successfully accomplish the sensor deployment task. Our approach involves the use of line-of-sight formation keeping, which enables the follower robot to use visual markers to move the group along the path executed by the leader robot. We present results of the implementation of this approach in simulation, as well as results to date in the implementation on physical robot systems. To our knowledge, this is the first implementation of robot herding using such highly heterogeneous robots, in which no single type of robot could accomplish the sensor network deployment task, even if multiple copies of that robot type were available.

[1]  Jaydev P. Desai Modeling multiple teams of mobile robots: a graph theoretic approach , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[2]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Most valuable player: a robot device server for distributed control , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[3]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  An Incremental Self-Deployment Algorithm for Mobile Sensor Networks , 2002, Auton. Robots.

[4]  David W. Payton,et al.  Pheromone Robotics , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[5]  Axel Walthelm,et al.  Active Distance Measurement based on Robust Artificial Markers as a Building Block for a Service Robot Architecture , 2000 .

[6]  Camillo J. Taylor,et al.  A vision-based formation control framework , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[7]  BurgardWolfram,et al.  A Probabilistic Approach to Concurrent Mapping and Localization for Mobile Robots , 1998 .

[8]  Ulrich Neumann,et al.  Multi-ring color fiducial systems for scalable fiducial tracking augmented reality , 1998, Proceedings. IEEE 1998 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (Cat. No.98CB36180).

[9]  Tucker R. Balch,et al.  Behavior-based formation control for multirobot teams , 1998, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Parameswaran Ramanathan,et al.  Sensor deployment strategy for target detection , 2002, WSNA '02.

[11]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Mobile Sensor Network Deployment using Potential Fields : A Distributed , Scalable Solution to the Area Coverage Problem , 2002 .

[12]  Ulrich Neumann,et al.  Fast color fiducial detection and dynamic workspace extension in video see-through self-tracking augmented reality , 1997, Proceedings The Fifth Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications.

[13]  S. Sitharama Iyengar,et al.  Coding theory framework for target location in distributed sensor networks , 2001, Proceedings International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing.

[14]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  A Probabilistic Approach to Concurrent Mapping and Localization for Mobile Robots , 1998, Auton. Robots.