Symbolic action priming relies on intact neural transmission along the retino-geniculo-striate pathway

Recent psychophysics studies suggest that the behavioral impact of a visual stimulus and its conscious visual recognition underlie two functionally dissociated neuronal processes. Previous TMS studies have demonstrated that certain features of a visual stimulus can still be processed despite TMS-induced disruption of perception. Here, we tested whether symbolic action priming also remains intact despite TMS-induced masking of the prime. We applied single-pulse TMS over primary visual cortex at various temporal intervals from 20 ms to 120 ms during a supraliminal action priming paradigm. This TMS protocol enabled us to identify at what exact time point a TMS-induced activity disruption of primary visual cortex interferes with conscious visual perception of the prime versus (un)conscious behavioral priming of the visual target stimulus. We also introduced spatial uncertainty by presenting visual stimuli either above or below the fixation cross, while the TMS pulse was always targeting the prime presented below fixation. We revealed that TMS over primary visual cortex interferes with both conscious visual perception and symbolic behavioral priming in a temporarily and spatially specific manner, i.e., only when disrupting primary visual cortex at approximately the same temporal stage between 60 and 100 ms after prime onset, and only for those prime stimuli presented below fixation. These findings are in disagreement with the idea of subliminal action priming being mediated by neural pathways bypassing striate cortex, and rather suggest that symbolic action priming relies on an intact neural transmission along the retino-geniculo-striate pathway. The implications of our findings for previous reports of residual visual processing during striate TMS are discussed.

[1]  U. Ziemann,et al.  Transient visual field defects induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over human occipital pole , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Jens Bo Nielsen,et al.  Action-blindsight in healthy subjects after transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  A Cohen,et al.  Extrageniculate vision in hemianopic humans: saccade inhibition by signals in the blind field. , 1990, Science.

[4]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Manifestation of scotomas created by transcranial magnetic stimulation of human visual cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Differential effects of low-frequency rTMS at the occipital pole on visual-induced alpha desynchronization and visual-evoked potentials , 2003, NeuroImage.

[6]  Alan P. Rudell,et al.  Unmasking human visual perception with the magnetic coil and its relationship to hemispheric asymmetry , 1993, Brain Research.

[7]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action (precis) , 1998 .

[8]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Neural adaptation reveals state‐dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[9]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  H. Masur,et al.  Suppression of visual perception by transcranial magnetic stimulation--experimental findings in healthy subjects and patients with optic neuritis. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  Tony Ro,et al.  Extrageniculate mediation of unconscious vision in transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced blindsight. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Tony Ro,et al.  Unconscious processing of orientation and color without primary visual cortex. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  On the Relations among Priming, Conscious Recollection, and Intentional Retrieval: Evidence from Neuroimaging Research , 1998, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[14]  V. Hömberg,et al.  Impairment of visual perception and visual short term memory scanning by transcranial magnetic stimulation of occipital cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  L. Weiskrantz Blindsight revisited , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[17]  T. Kammer,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the visual system. I. The psychophysics of visual suppression , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Haluk Ogmen,et al.  The what and where in visual masking , 2003, Vision Research.

[19]  D. Schacter,et al.  Priming and the Brain , 1998, Neuron.

[20]  E Corthout,et al.  Suppression of vision by transcranial magnetic stimulation: a third mechanism , 2000, Neuroreport.

[21]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  L Weiskrantz,et al.  Roots of blindsight. , 2004, Progress in Brain Research.

[23]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Residual vision in a scotoma: implications for blindsight. , 1992, Science.

[24]  Y Kamitani,et al.  Effects of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on functional brain activity: a combined event-related TMS and evoked potential study , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  A P Rudell,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in study of the visual pathway. , 1998, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[26]  Antigona Martínez,et al.  Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  H E Bedell,et al.  Gamma-range oscillations in backward-masking functions and their putative neural correlates. , 2000, Psychological review.

[28]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Wavelength sensitivity in blindsight , 1989, Nature.

[29]  O. Neumann,et al.  Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. , 1999 .

[30]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them , 1991, Nature.

[31]  B U Meyer,et al.  Magnetic stimuli applied over motor and visual cortex: influence of coil position and field polarity on motor responses, phosphenes, and eye movements. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[32]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[33]  C. Koch,et al.  Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex? , 1995, Nature.

[34]  M. Bar,et al.  Top-down facilitation of visual object recognition: object-based and context-based contributions. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[35]  T. Ro Unconscious vision in action , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Michael Erb,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the visual system. II. Characterization of induced phosphenes and scotomas , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  The temporal characteristics of motion processing in hMT/V5+: Combining fMRI and neuronavigated TMS , 2006, NeuroImage.

[38]  L. Merabet,et al.  Occipital Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Has Opposing Effects on Visual and Auditory Stimulus Detection: Implications for Multisensory Interactions , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  C M Epstein,et al.  Magnetic coil suppression of extrafoveal visual perception using disappearance targets. , 1996, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[40]  R. Held,et al.  Residual Visual Function after Brain Wounds involving the Central Visual Pathways in Man , 1973, Nature.

[41]  Thomas Kammer,et al.  Phosphene thresholds evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation are insensitive to short-lasting variations in ambient light , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  J. Schwarzbach,et al.  Different time courses for visual perception and action priming , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Pieter R Roelfsema,et al.  The role of primary visual cortex (V1) in visual awareness , 2000, Vision Research.

[44]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[45]  W Paulus,et al.  Differentiation of parvo- and magnocellular pathways by TMS at the occipital cortex. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[46]  V. Amassian,et al.  Suppression of visual perception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[47]  J. Bullier Feedback connections and conscious vision , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  A. Cowey,et al.  Wavelength discrimination in blindsight. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[49]  Anders Fuglsang-Frederiksen,et al.  A TMS study of the ventral projections from V1 with implications for the finding of neural correlates of consciousness , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[50]  Michael H. Herzog,et al.  Combining backward masking and transcranial magnetic stimulation in human observers , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[51]  L Weiskrantz,et al.  Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation. , 1974, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[52]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Two periods of processing in the (circum)striate visual cortex as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: delays in visual suppression due to luminance changes. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[54]  M. Eimer,et al.  Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  M. Goodale,et al.  Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[56]  Alan Cowey,et al.  The neurobiology of blindsight , 1991, Trends in Neurosciences.

[57]  A. Milner,et al.  Cerebral correlates of visual awareness , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[58]  Tomás Paus,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Human Frontal Eye ®eld Facilitates Visual Awareness , 2022 .

[59]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[60]  Frank Tong,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Primary visual cortex and visual awareness , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[61]  A. Cowey,et al.  Task–specific impairments and enhancements induced by magnetic stimulation of human visual area V5 , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[62]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  A comparison of masking by visual and transcranial magnetic stimulation: implications for the study of conscious and unconscious visual processing , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[63]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[64]  Robin Laycock,et al.  Evidence for fast signals and later processing in human V1/V2 and V5/MT+: A TMS study of motion perception. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[65]  C. A. Marzi,et al.  Spatial summation across the vertical meridian in hemianopics: A test of blindsight , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[66]  D. Braun,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of extrastriate cortex degrades human motion direction discrimination , 1994, Vision Research.

[67]  E Corthout,et al.  Timing of activity in early visual cortex as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[68]  B. Breitmeyer,et al.  Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[69]  G. Francis,et al.  Cortical dynamics of lateral inhibition: metacontrast masking. , 1997, Psychological review.

[70]  R. Desimone,et al.  Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[71]  J W McClurkin,et al.  The visual superior colliculus and pulvinar. , 1989, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[72]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Analysis of visual behavior , 1982 .