Determining the benefit of human input in human-in-the-loop robotic systems

In this work, we analyze the pick and place task for a human-in-the-loop robotic system to determine where human input can be most beneficial to a collaborative task. This is accomplished by implementing a pick and place task on a commercial robotic arm system and determining which segments of the task, when replaced by human guidance, provide the most improvement to overall task performance and require the least cognitive effort. The pick and place task can be segmented into two main areas: coarse approach towards goal object and fine pick motion. For the fine picking phase, we look at the importance of user guidance in terms of position and orientation of the end effector. Results from our experiment show that the most successful strategy for our human-in-the-loop system is the one in which the human specifies a general region for grasping, and the robotic system completes the remaining elements of the task. Our experimental setup and procedures could be generalized and used to guide similar analysis of human impact in other human-in-the-loop systems performing other tasks.

[1]  Yu Sun,et al.  Learning grasping force from demonstration , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Yu Sun,et al.  Visual servoing control of a 9-DoF WMRA to perform ADL tasks , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Miti Ruchanurucks,et al.  Kinect-based obstacle detection for manipulator , 2011, 2011 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII).

[4]  Rachid Alami,et al.  Automatic planning of pick and place operations in presence of uncertainties , 1990, EEE International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Towards a New Frontier of Applications.

[5]  Rachid Alami,et al.  How may I serve you?: a robot companion approaching a seated person in a helping context , 2006, HRI '06.

[6]  M. Nakamura,et al.  Neural network-based hybrid human-in-the-loop control for meal assistance orthosis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Of references. , 1966, JAMA.

[8]  Sudeep Sarkar,et al.  Multi-scale superquadric fitting for efficient shape and pose recovery of unknown objects , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Kevin R Duda,et al.  Markov analysis of human-in-the-loop system performance , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[10]  Stephen M. Stigler,et al.  Fisher and the 5% Level , 2008 .

[11]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Strategies for human-in-the-loop robotic grasping , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[12]  Michael D. Coovert,et al.  Exploration of intention expression for robots , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[13]  Ewart de Visser,et al.  Measurement of trust in human-robot collaboration , 2007, 2007 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems.

[14]  Tomás Lozano-Pérez,et al.  Task-level planning of pick-and-place robot motions , 1989, Computer.

[15]  Michael Beetz,et al.  Obstacle avoidance in a pick-and-place task , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO).

[16]  J. Geoffrey Chase,et al.  Multimodal Metric Study for Human-Robot Collaboration , 2008, First International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction.

[17]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  Effects of anticipated human-robot interaction and predictability of robot behavior on perceptions of anthropomorphism , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[18]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  A Framework for Reasoning About the Human in the Loop , 2008, UPSEC.

[19]  Katherine M. Tsui,et al.  “I want that”: Human-in-the-loop control of a wheelchair-mounted robotic arm , 2011 .

[20]  Yael Edan,et al.  Optimal Collaboration in Human-Robot Target Recognition Systems , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[21]  Laurent Jeanpierre,et al.  Human-robot collaboration for a shared mission , 2010, 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[22]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Keep Your Options Open: An Information-Based Driving Principle for Sensorimotor Systems , 2008, PloS one.

[23]  Hyung-Soon Park,et al.  Development of a Robotic Arm for Handicapped People: A Task-Oriented Design Approach , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[24]  Jeffrey Too Chuan Tan,et al.  Information support development with human-centered approach for human-robot collaboration in cellular manufacturing , 2010, 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[25]  F. Farelo,et al.  Task-oriented control of a 9-DoF WMRA system for opening a spring-loaded door task , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[26]  José M. Martínez,et al.  Robot-arm pick and place behavior programming system using visual perception , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[27]  Redwan Alqasemi,et al.  Kinematics, control and redundancy resolution of a 9-DoF wheelchair-mounted robotic arm system for ADL tasks , 2009, 2009 6th International Symposium on Mechatronics and its Applications.

[28]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Common metrics for human-robot interaction , 2006, HRI '06.

[29]  Dong-Soo Kwon,et al.  A Formal Method of Measuring Interactivity in HRI , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[30]  Tuna Balkan,et al.  Multisensor controlled robotic tracking and automatic pick and place , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robot and Systems. Innovative Robotics for Real-World Applications. IROS '97.

[31]  Y. Measson,et al.  Robot grasping of unknown objects, description and validation of the function with quadriplegic people , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.