The Elephant in the Room: Inconsistency in Scene Viewing and Representation

We examined the extent to which semantic informativeness, consistency with expectations and perceptual salience contribute to object prioritization in scene viewing and representation. In scene viewing (Experiments 1–2), semantic guidance overshadowed perceptual guidance in determining fixation order, with the greatest prioritization for objects that were diagnostic of the scene’s depicted event. Perceptual properties affected selection of consistent objects (regardless of their informativeness) but not of inconsistent objects. Semantic and perceptual properties also interacted in influencing foveal inspection, as inconsistent objects were fixated longer than low but not high salience diagnostic objects. While not studied in direct competition with each other (each studied in competition with diagnostic objects), we found that inconsistent objects were fixated earlier and for longer than consistent but marginally informative objects. In change detection (Experiment 3), perceptual guidance overshadowed semantic guidance, promoting detection of highly salient changes. A residual advantage for diagnosticity over inconsistency emerged only when selection prioritization could not be based on low-level features. Overall these findings show that semantic inconsistency is not prioritized within a scene when competing with other relevant information that is essential to scene understanding and respects observers’ expectations. Moreover, they reveal that the relative dominance of semantic or perceptual properties during selection depends on ongoing task requirements.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  M. Potter Meaning in visual search. , 1975, Science.

[3]  tephen E. Palmer The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[4]  N. Mackworth,et al.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  A. Friedman Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[7]  K. Rayner,et al.  The effect of background information on object identification , 2017 .

[8]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effect of background information on object identification. , 1989 .

[9]  P. de Graef,et al.  Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification , 1990, Psychological research.

[10]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[11]  C. J. McGrath,et al.  Effect of exchange rate return on volatility spill-over across trading regions , 2012 .

[12]  Philippe G Schyns,et al.  Diagnostic recognition: task constraints, object information, and their interactions , 1998, Cognition.

[13]  J. Henderson,et al.  Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  J. Henderson,et al.  Object identification is isolated from scene semantic constraint: evidence from object type and token discrimination. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[15]  J. Henderson,et al.  The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing , 1999 .

[16]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  On the Failure to Detect Changes in Scenes Across Brief Interruptions , 2000 .

[17]  J. Henderson,et al.  Semantic Informativeness Mediates the Detection of Changes in Natural Scenes , 2000 .

[18]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Picture Changes During Blinks: Looking Without Seeing and Seeing Without Looking , 2000 .

[19]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[20]  A. Oliva,et al.  Diagnostic Colors Mediate Scene Recognition , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  I. Thornton,et al.  Change Detection Without Awareness: Do Explicit Reports Underestimate the Representation of Change in the Visual System? , 2000 .

[22]  David E. Irwin,et al.  The role of attentional breadth in perceptual change detection , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  Ronald A. Rensink Change detection. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  Derrick J. Parkhurst,et al.  Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention , 2002, Vision Research.

[25]  J. Henderson,et al.  Testing a conceptual locus for the inconsistent object change detection advantage in real-world scenes. , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[26]  M. Kutas,et al.  An electrophysiological study of scene effects on object identification. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[27]  R. D. Gordon Attentional allocation during the perception of scenes. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Abel G. Oliva,et al.  Gist of a scene , 2005 .

[29]  M. Morgan,et al.  The Role of Target Salience in Crowding , 2005, Perception.

[30]  D. Levin,et al.  Change blindness and visual memory: visual representations get rich and act poor. , 2006, British journal of psychology.

[31]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Attentional Cues in Real Scenes, Saccadic Targeting, and Bayesian Priors , 2005, Psychological science.

[32]  P. Sterling,et al.  How Much the Eye Tells the Brain , 2006, Current Biology.

[33]  J. Groeger,et al.  Attention-memory interactions in scene perception. , 2006, Spatial vision.

[34]  T. Foulsham,et al.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: in press Visual saliency and semantic incongruency influence eye movements when , 2022 .

[35]  Xin Chen,et al.  Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance , 2006, Vision Research.

[36]  J. Findlay,et al.  Absence of scene context effects in object detection and eye gaze capture , 2007 .

[37]  G. Underwood,et al.  Low-level visual saliency does not predict change detection in natural scenes. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[38]  Jodi L. Davenport Consistency effects between objects in scenes , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[39]  B. Tatler,et al.  Pictures in Mind: Initial Encoding of Object Properties Varies with the Realism of the Scene Stimulus , 2007, Perception.

[40]  G. Underwood,et al.  Congruency, saliency and gist in the inspection of objects in natural scenes , 2007 .

[41]  T. Foulsham,et al.  Is attention necessary for object identification? Evidence from eye movements during the inspection of real-world scenes , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[42]  Marcus Nyström,et al.  Semantic override of low-level features in image viewing - both initially and overall , 2008 .

[43]  R. D. Gordon,et al.  Attention to smoking-related and incongruous objects during scene viewing. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[44]  J. Henderson,et al.  Prioritizing new objects for eye fixation in real-world scenes: Effects of object–scene consistency , 2008 .

[45]  C. Koch,et al.  Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[46]  P. Perona,et al.  Objects predict fixations better than early saliency. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[47]  A. Kiesel,et al.  Change detection: evidence for information accumulation in flicker paradigms. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[48]  George L. Malcolm,et al.  Searching in the dark: Cognitive relevance drives attention in real-world scenes , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  Christopher A. Dickinson,et al.  Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: Consequences of an attentional bias? , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[50]  Michael S. Fine,et al.  Visual Salience Affects Performance in a Working Memory Task , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Bayesian surprise attracts human attention , 2005, Vision Research.

[52]  J. Henderson,et al.  Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[53]  Peter König,et al.  Influence of Low-Level Stimulus Features, Task Dependent Factors, and Spatial Biases on Overt Visual Attention , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[54]  M. Donk,et al.  The Time Course of Color- and Luminance-Based Salience Effects , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[55]  Tom Foulsham,et al.  Asymmetries in the direction of saccades during perception of scenes and fractals: Effects of image type and image features , 2010, Vision Research.

[56]  J. Henderson,et al.  Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[57]  L. Deouell,et al.  ERP evidence for context congruity effects during simultaneous object–scene processing , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[58]  Alex D. Hwang,et al.  Object Frequency and Predictability Effects on Eye Fixation Durations in Real-World Scene Viewing , 2010 .

[59]  M. Masson,et al.  A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming , 2010 .

[60]  S. Spotorno,et al.  Change Detection in Complex Scenes: Hemispheric Contribution and the Role of Perceptual and Semantic Factors , 2011, Perception.

[61]  Gregory J Zelinsky,et al.  Cutting through the clutter: searching for targets in evolving complex scenes. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[62]  Katherine Humphrey,et al.  Decisions about objects in real-world scenes are influenced by visual saliency before and during their inspection , 2011, Vision Research.

[63]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Object co-occurrence serves as a contextual cue to guide and facilitate visual search in a natural viewing environment. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[64]  M. Castelhano,et al.  Scene context influences without scene gist: Eye movements guided by spatial associations in visual search , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[65]  J. Henderson,et al.  Object–scene inconsistencies do not capture gaze: evidence from the flash-preview moving-window paradigm , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[66]  D. Ballard,et al.  Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[67]  Cedric E. Ginestet ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis , 2011 .

[68]  D. Levi,et al.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[69]  Alex D. Hwang,et al.  Semantic guidance of eye movements in real-world scenes , 2011, Vision Research.

[70]  W. Einhäuser,et al.  Fixations on objects in natural scenes: dissociating importance from salience , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[71]  Ali Borji,et al.  Objects do not predict fixations better than early saliency: a re-analysis of Einhauser et al.'s data. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[72]  E. Macaluso,et al.  Visual Salience Improves Spatial Working Memory via Enhanced Parieto-Temporal Functional Connectivity , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[73]  B. Tatler,et al.  Semantic consistency versus perceptual salience in visual scenes: findings from change detection. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[74]  T. Foulsham,et al.  Leftward biases in picture scanning and line bisection: A gaze-contingent window study , 2013, Vision Research.

[75]  Ali Borji,et al.  What stands out in a scene? A study of human explicit saliency judgment , 2013, Vision Research.

[76]  Maciej Pajak,et al.  Object-based saccadic selection during scene perception: evidence from viewing position effects. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[77]  N. Busch The fate of object memory traces under change detection and change blindness , 2013, Brain Research.

[78]  A. Nuthmann,et al.  Time course of pseudoneglect in scene viewing , 2014, Cortex.

[79]  Monica S. Castelhano,et al.  Peripheral guidance in scenes: The interaction of scene context and object content. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[80]  M. Pomplun,et al.  Guidance of visual attention by semantic information in real-world scenes , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[81]  George L. Malcolm,et al.  How context information and target information guide the eyes from the first epoch of search in real-world scenes. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[82]  Nida Latif,et al.  The art of gaze guidance. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[83]  Shuo Wang,et al.  Predicting human gaze beyond pixels. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[84]  Moreno I. Coco,et al.  The Interplay of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Mechanisms in Visual Guidance during Object Naming , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[85]  P. König,et al.  Spatial biases in viewing behavior. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[86]  George L. Malcolm,et al.  Disentangling the effects of spatial inconsistency of targets and distractors when searching in realistic scenes. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[87]  Valerio Santangelo,et al.  Perceptual salience affects the contents of working memory during free-recollection of objects from natural scenes , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[88]  M. Bar,et al.  Prediction, context, and competition in visual recognition , 2015, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[89]  James L. McClelland,et al.  You shall know an object by the company it keeps: An investigation of semantic representations derived from object co-occurrence in visual scenes , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[90]  Valerio Santangelo Forced to remember: When memory is biased by salient information , 2015, Behavioural Brain Research.

[91]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  Visual scenes are categorized by function. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[92]  Jacob L. Orquin,et al.  Areas of Interest as a Signal Detection Problem in Behavioral Eye-Tracking Research , 2016 .

[93]  Tim H. W. Cornelissen,et al.  Stuck on semantics: Processing of irrelevant object-scene inconsistencies modulates ongoing gaze behavior , 2017, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[94]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  LATEST: A Model of Saccadic Decisions in Space and Time , 2017, Psychological review.

[95]  Mieke Donk,et al.  Salient object changes influence overt attentional prioritization and object-based targeting in natural scenes , 2017, PloS one.

[96]  Gibson,et al.  Object Identification , 2017, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining.

[97]  L. Itti The iLab Neuromorphic Vision C + + Toolkit : Free tools for the next generation of vision algorithms , 2022 .