Actuator gain distributions to analytically meet specified performance capabilities in serial robot manipulators

A serial robotic manipulator arm is a complex electromechanical system whose performance is characterized by its actuators. The actuator itself is a complex nonlinear system whose performance can be characterized by the speed and torque capabilities of its motor, and its accuracy depends on the resolution of the encoder as well as its ability to resist deformations under load. The mechanical gain associated with the transmission is critical to the overall performance of the actuator since it amplifies the motor torque, thus improving the force capability of the manipulator housing it, reduces the motor speed to a suitable output speed operating range, and amplifies the stiffness improving the precision under load of the overall system. In this work, a basic analytic process that can be used to manage the actuator gain parameter to obtain an improved arm design based on a set of desired/required performance specifications will be laid out. Key to this analytic process is the mapping of the actuator parameters (speed, torque, stiffness, and encoder resolution) to their effective values at the system output via the mechanical gains of the actuators as well as the effective mechanical gains of the manipulator. This forward mapping of the actuator parameters allows the designer to determine how each of the parameters influences the functional capacity of the serial manipulator arm. The actuator gains are then distributed along the effective length of the manipulator to determine their effects on the performance capabilities of the system. The analytic formulation is also demonstrated to be effective in addressing the issue of configuration management of serial robotic manipulators where the goal is to assemble a system that meets some required performance specifications. To this end, two examples demonstrating a solution of the configuration management problem are presented. The analytic process developed based on the mapping of the mechanical parameters of the actuator to their effective values at the system output is shown to dramatically reduce the effort in the initial phases of the design process, meaning that the number of design iterations can be dramatically reduced.

[1]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  The dynamic capability equations: a new tool for analyzing robotic manipulator performance , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[2]  Shane Farritor,et al.  On Modular Design of Field Robotic Systems , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[3]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  A rapidly deployable manipulator system , 1997, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[4]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  Task-Based Configuration Management for Modular Serial Robotic Manipulators , 2007 .

[5]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa Translational and rotational manipulability of robotic manipulators , 1991, Proceedings IECON '91: 1991 International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation.

[6]  H. Asada,et al.  A Geometrical Representation of Manipulator Dynamics and Its Application to Arm Design , 1983 .

[7]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Design of Direct-Drive Mechanical Arms' , 1983 .

[8]  D. Tesar Electro-mechanical actuators for the navy's ships , 2005, IEEE Electric Ship Technologies Symposium, 2005..

[9]  Delbert Tesar,et al.  Dynamic modeling of serial manipulator arms , 1982 .

[10]  Delbert Tesar,et al.  Model Formulation of Complex Mechanisms With Multiple Inputs: Part II—The Dynamic Model , 1977 .

[11]  Joel W. Burdick,et al.  Determining task optimal modular robot assembly configurations , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Delbert Tesar Thirty-year forecast: The concept of a fifth generation of robotics - the super robot , 1989 .

[13]  Gordon A. Russell,et al.  Real Analysis: A First Course , 1997 .

[14]  Delbert Tesar,et al.  A Visualization Framework for Real Time Decision Making in a Multi-Input Multi-Output System , 2008, IEEE Systems Journal.

[15]  Delbert Tesar,et al.  Model Formulation of Complex Mechanisms With Multiple Inputs: Part I—Geometry , 1977 .

[16]  Robert Owen Ambrose Design, construction and demonstration of modular, reconfigurable robots , 1991 .

[17]  Delbert Tesar,et al.  OPTIMAL ACTUATOR SIZING FOR ROBOTIC MANIPULATORS BASED ON LOCAL DYNAMIC CRITERIA. , 1984 .

[18]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Intrinsically Safer Robots , 1995 .