Controlling Buoyancy-Driven Profiling Floats for Applications in Ocean Observation

Establishing a persistent presence in the ocean with an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) capable of observing temporal variability of large-scale ocean processes requires a unique sensor platform. In this paper, we examine the utility of vehicles that can only control their depth in the water column for such extended deployments. We present a strategy that utilizes ocean model predictions to facilitate a basic level of autonomy and enables general control for these profiling floats. The proposed method is based on experimentally validated techniques for utilizing ocean current models to control autonomous gliders. With the appropriate vertical actuation, and utilizing spatio-temporal variations in water speed and direction, we show that general controllability results can be met. First, we apply an A* planner to a local controllability map generated from predictions of ocean currents. This computes a path between start and goal waypoints that has the highest likelihood of successful execution. A computed depth plan is generated with a model-predictive controller (MPC), and selects the depths for the vehicle so that ambient currents guide it toward the goal. Mission constraints are included to simulate and motivate a practical data collection mission. Results are presented in simulation for a mission off the coast of Los Angeles, CA, USA, that show encouraging results in the ability of a drifting vehicle to reach a desired location.

[1]  Ryan N. Smith,et al.  Controlled Drift: An Investigation into the Controllability of Underwater Vehicles with Minimal Actuation , 2011, ICRA 2011.

[2]  Russ E. Davis,et al.  AUTONOMOUS PROFILING FLOATS: WORKHORSE FOR BROAD-SCALE OCEAN OBSERVATIONS , 2004 .

[3]  Oliver Zielinski,et al.  On Active Current Selection for Lagrangian Profilers , 2013 .

[4]  Alexander F. Shchepetkin,et al.  The regional oceanic modeling system (ROMS): a split-explicit, free-surface, topography-following-coordinate oceanic model , 2005 .

[5]  James C. McWilliams,et al.  Quasi-Monotone Advection Schemes Based on Explicit Locally Adaptive Dissipation , 1998 .

[6]  Fumin Zhang,et al.  A lower bound on navigation error for marine robots guided by ocean circulation models , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[7]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Towards improving mission execution for autonomous gliders with an ocean model and kalman filter , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Chris Roman,et al.  Lagrangian floats as sea floor imaging platforms , 2011 .

[9]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Planning and Implementing Trajectories for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles to Track Evolving Ocean Processes Based on Predictions from a Regional Ocean Model , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[10]  Russ E. Davis,et al.  Observing the general circulation with floats , 1991 .

[11]  J. Lofberg,et al.  YALMIP : a toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37508).

[12]  Oscar Schofield,et al.  Slocum Gliders: Robust and ready , 2007, J. Field Robotics.

[13]  Gabriel Oliver,et al.  Path Planning of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles in Current Fields with Complex Spatial Variability: an A* Approach , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  David M. Farmer,et al.  A Lagrangian Float , 1996 .

[15]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Towards the Improvement of Autonomous Glider Navigational Accuracy Through the use of Regional Ocean Models , 2010 .

[16]  S. Bhat Controllability of Nonlinear Systems , 2022 .

[17]  Wei-Liang Chow Über Systeme von liearren partiellen Differentialgleichungen erster Ordnung , 1940 .

[18]  Joshua Grady Graver,et al.  UNDERWATER GLIDERS: DYNAMICS, CONTROL AND DESIGN , 2005 .

[19]  A. D. Lewis,et al.  Geometric Control of Mechanical Systems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[20]  Michael T. Wolf,et al.  Probabilistic motion planning of balloons in strong, uncertain wind fields , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[21]  Johan Efberg,et al.  YALMIP : A toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB , 2004 .

[22]  Matthew Dunbabin,et al.  Go with the flow : optimal AUV path planning in coastal environments , 2009, ICRA 2009.

[23]  M. Morari,et al.  Optimal controllers for hybrid systems: stability and piecewise linear explicit form , 2000, Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187).

[24]  Scott Willcox,et al.  The Wave Glider: A persistent platform for ocean science , 2010, OCEANS'10 IEEE SYDNEY.

[25]  E. Pistikopoulos,et al.  A multiparametric programming approach for linear process engineering problems under uncertainty , 1997 .

[26]  Kristi A. Morgansen,et al.  Geometric Methods for Modeling and Control of Free-Swimming Fin-Actuated Underwater Vehicles , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[27]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Persistent ocean monitoring with underwater gliders: Adapting sampling resolution , 2011, J. Field Robotics.

[28]  B. Jones,et al.  Cross-shelf transport into nearshore waters due to shoaling internal tides in San Pedro Bay, CA. , 2009 .

[29]  A. Caiti,et al.  Evolutionary path planning for autonomous underwater vehicles in a variable ocean , 2004, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[30]  Wei-Liang Chow Über Systeme von linearen partiellen Differential-gleichungen erster Ordnung , 1941 .

[31]  Oliver Zielinski,et al.  Towards Selective Tidal-Stream Transport for Lagrangian profilers , 2011, OCEANS'11 MTS/IEEE KONA.

[32]  Russ E. Davis,et al.  The Autonomous Lagrangian Circulation Explorer (ALACE) , 1992 .

[33]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Coordinated control of an underwater glider fleet in an adaptive ocean sampling field experiment in Monterey Bay , 2010, J. Field Robotics.

[34]  Gianna Stefani,et al.  Controllability along a trajectory: a variational approach , 1993 .

[35]  Edward R. Levine,et al.  The isopycnal swallow float—A simple device for tracking water parcels in the ocean , 1985 .

[36]  Rustam Stolkin,et al.  Optimal AUV path planning for extended missions in complex, fast-flowing estuarine environments , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[37]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Cooperative Control for Ocean Sampling: The Glider Coordinated Control System , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[38]  David R. Thompson,et al.  Current-sensitive path planning for an underactuated free-floating ocean Sensorweb , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[39]  Mato Baotic,et al.  Multi-Parametric Toolbox (MPT) , 2004, HSCC.

[40]  Ryan N. Smith,et al.  Controlling minimally-actuated vehicles for applications in ocean observation , 2012 .

[41]  John L. Largier,et al.  Cross-shelf subtidal variability in San Pedro Bay during summer, 2001 , 2006 .

[42]  Yan Pailhas,et al.  Path Planning for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[43]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  An Algorithm for the Solution of Multiparametric Mixed Integer Linear Programming Problems , 2000, Ann. Oper. Res..