A geometric approach to gait generation for eel-like locomotion

We investigate issues of control and motion planning for a biomimetic robotic system. Previous work has shown that the motion problem can be decoupled into trajectory generation and steering. We investigate basic issues of momentum generation for a class of dynamic mobile robots, focusing on eel-like swimming robots. We use control laws based on a series of gaits motivated by the biological literature on coupled oscillators and central pattern generators. A primary characteristic of this class of robots is that drift plays a significant role in the generation of motion. We develop theoretical justification for a forward gait that has been observed in nature and for a turning gait, used in our control laws, that has not yet been studied in the biological literature. We also explore theoretical predictions of novel gaits for turning and sideways swimming.

[1]  Jaydev P. Desai,et al.  Continuous Motion Plans for Robotic Systems with Changing Dynamic Behavior , 1996 .

[2]  Jerrold E. Marsden,et al.  Symmetries in Motion: Geometric Foundations of Motion Control , 1998 .

[3]  Lydia E. Kavraki,et al.  Planning Paths for Elastic Objects under Manipulation Constraints , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[4]  Jean-Claude Latombe,et al.  Robot motion planning , 1970, The Kluwer international series in engineering and computer science.

[5]  James P. Ostrowski Steering for a class of dynamic nonholonomic systems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[6]  P. Holmes,et al.  The nature of the coupling between segmental oscillators of the lamprey spinal generator for locomotion: A mathematical model , 1982, Journal of mathematical biology.

[7]  Joel W. Burdick,et al.  The Geometric Mechanics of Undulatory Robotic Locomotion , 1998, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[8]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Optimal Gait Selection for Nonholonomic Locomotion Systems , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  L. Kavraki,et al.  A General Framework for Planning Paths for Elastic Objects , 1999 .

[10]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Geometric phases and robotic locomotion , 1995, J. Field Robotics.

[11]  Joel W. Burdick,et al.  Modelling and experimental investigation of carangiform locomotion for control , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36207).

[12]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.