Optimal Negotiation Decision Functions in Time-Sensitive Domains

The last two decades have seen a growing interest in automated agents that are able to negotiate on behalf of human negotiators in a wide variety of negotiation domains. One key aspect of a successful negotiating agent is its ability to make appropriate concessions at the right time, especially when there are costs associated with the duration of the negotiation. However, so far, there is no fundamental approach on how much to concede at every stage of the negotiation in such time-sensitive domains. We introduce an efficient solution based on simultaneous search, which is able to select the optimal sequence of offers that maximizes expected payoff, given the agent's beliefs about the opponent. To this end, we show that our approach is consistent with known theoretical results and we demonstrate both its effectiveness and natural properties by applying it to a number of typical negotiation scenarios. Finally, we show in a number of experiments that our solution outperforms other state of the art strategy benchmarks.

[1]  J. Rubin,et al.  The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation , 1975 .

[2]  Takayuki Ito,et al.  Novel Insights in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation , 2014, Novel Insights in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation.

[3]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  GENIUS: AN INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENT FOR SUPPORTING THE DESIGN OF GENERIC AUTOMATED NEGOTIATORS , 2012, Comput. Intell..

[4]  A. Rubinstein Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model , 1982 .

[5]  H. Raiffa The Art & Science of Negotiation , 1983 .

[6]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  Benefits of Learning in Negotiation , 1997, AAAI/IAAI.

[7]  Nick Craswell,et al.  An experimental comparison of click position-bias models , 2008, WSDM '08.

[8]  Koen V. Hindriks,et al.  A Tit for Tat Negotiation Strategy for Real-Time Bilateral Negotiations , 2013, Complex Automated Negotiations.

[9]  Minjie Zhang,et al.  Bayesian-based preference prediction in bilateral multi-issue negotiation between intelligent agents , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[10]  A. Z. Hamadani,et al.  DOPPONENT: A Socially Efficient Preference Model of Opponent in Bilateral Multi Issue Negotiations , 2015 .

[11]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Central European Journal of Operational Research , 2003 Mining Inspire Data for the Determinants of Successful Internet Negotiations , 2003 .

[12]  Rakesh V. Vohra,et al.  Simultaneous selection , 2016, Discret. Appl. Math..

[13]  P. Carnevale,et al.  Time Pressure and the Development of Integrative Agreements in Bilateral Negotiations , 1986 .

[14]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Optimal negotiation of multiple issues in incomplete information settings , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[15]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  An Overview of the Results and Insights from the Third Automated Negotiating Agents Competition (ANAC2012) , 2014, Novel Insights in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation.

[16]  Sandip Sen,et al.  Modeling opponent decision in repeated one-shot negotiations , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[17]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Can automated agents proficiently negotiate with humans? , 2010, CACM.

[18]  Hector Chade,et al.  Simultaneous Search , 2006 .

[19]  Katsuhide Fujita,et al.  Compromising Strategy Based on Estimated Maximum Utility for Automated Negotiation Agents Competition (ANAC-10) , 2011, IEA/AIE.

[20]  Koen V. Hindriks,et al.  Optimal Non-adaptive Concession Strategies with Incomplete Information , 2014, ANAC@AAMAS.

[21]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Evaluating practical negotiating agents: Results and analysis of the 2011 international competition , 2013, Artif. Intell..

[22]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[23]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation using incomplete preference information , 2007, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[24]  Ho-fung Leung,et al.  An efficient and robust negotiating strategy in bilateral negotiations over multiple items , 2014, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[25]  Jeffrey Z. Rubin,et al.  The Social Psychology of Bargaining and Negotiation. , 1976 .

[26]  Mohammad Mahdian,et al.  A Cascade Model for Externalities in Sponsored Search , 2008, WINE.

[27]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents , 1998, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[28]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Optimal Negotiation Strategies for Agents with Incomplete Information , 2001, ATAL.

[29]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Strategic Negotiation in Multiagent Environments , 2001, Intelligent robots and autonomous agents.

[30]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Negotiation Support and E-negotiation Systems: An Overview , 2007 .

[31]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Using Gaussian Processes to Optimise Concession in Complex Negotiations against Unknown Opponents , 2011, IJCAI.

[32]  Takayuki Ito,et al.  AgentK: Compromising Strategy based on Estimated Maximum Utility for Automated Negotiating Agents , 2012, New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations.

[33]  Ho-fung Leung,et al.  CUHKAgent: An Adaptive Negotiation Strategy for Bilateral Negotiations over Multiple Items , 2014, Novel Insights in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation.

[34]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  The First Automated Negotiating Agents Competition (ANAC 2010) , 2012, New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations.

[35]  Takayuki Ito,et al.  New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations , 2011, Studies in Computational Intelligence.