Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: Testing a two-process model

Although large variations in the magnitude of attentional capture have been evidenced across a wide range of studies and paradigms (see Burnham, 2007, for a review), the nature of these variations is unclear. In the present study, we used a modified spatial cuing task to address two related issues. In the first experiment, we explored the hypothesis that the magnitude of attentional capture varies systematically as a function of cue-target similarity. Targets of a particular color were preceded by uninformative peripheral cues carrying varying percentages of the target color. As was predicted, the magnitude of attentional capture varied directly with the similarity between cue and target. In the second experiment, we explored whether these similarity effects reflect a mixture of trials on which attention is fully captured and trials on which attention is not captured at all (i.e., a two-process model). A mixture analysis conducted on obtained reaction time distributions proved inconsistent with a two-process model.

[1]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Attentional capture by visual singletons is mediated by top-down task set: new evidence from the N2pc component. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[2]  Antigona Martínez,et al.  Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  H. Intraub,et al.  Presentation rate and the representation of briefly glimpsed pictures in memory. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[4]  Elisabetta Làdavas,et al.  Seeing where your hands are , 1997, Nature.

[5]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Synchronous neural oscillations and cognitive processes , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Involuntary Attentional Capture is Determined by Task Set: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[10]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Synaesthesia? A window into perception, thought and language , 2001 .

[11]  The reverse Müller-Lyer illusion and "enclosure". , 1968, British journal of psychology.

[12]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[13]  G. Alvarez,et al.  Spatial separation between targets constrains maintenance of attention on multiple objects , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  B. Julesz A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision , 1984, Trends in Neurosciences.

[15]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  R. Streit,et al.  Probabilistic Multi-Hypothesis Tracking , 1995 .

[17]  Circumscribed Shapes are Enlarged: Is This a Variation of the Delboeuf Illusion? , 2007, Perceptual and motor skills.

[18]  Z. Pylyshyn Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. , 1999, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[19]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory , 2005, Nature.

[20]  Brian D. Fisher,et al.  Evidence against a speed limit in multiple-object tracking , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  J. Jonides Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[22]  J. Henderson Human gaze control during real-world scene perception , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  J. Neuschatz,et al.  Recollections of things schematic: room schemas revisited. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  M. Riesenhuber,et al.  Evaluation of a Shape-Based Model of Human Face Discrimination Using fMRI and Behavioral Techniques , 2006, Neuron.

[25]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article The Briefest of Glances The Time Course of Natural Scene Understanding , 2022 .

[26]  S. Tipper,et al.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. , 1994 .

[27]  Dominique Lamy,et al.  Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  J. Jonides Towards a model of the mind's eye's movement. , 1980, Canadian journal of psychology.

[29]  Bryan R. Burnham,et al.  Displaywide visual features associated with a search display’s appearance can mediate attentional capture , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  E. Vogel,et al.  Human Variation in Overriding Attentional Capture , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The N2pc component and its links to attention shifts and spatially selective visual processing. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[35]  George A. Alvarez,et al.  How many objects can you attentively track?: Evidence for a resource-limited tracking mechanism , 2007 .

[36]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  Bottom-up priming of top-down attentional control settings , 2008 .

[37]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  R. Remington,et al.  Top-down modulation of preattentive processing: Testing the recovery account of contingent capture , 2006 .

[39]  Z. Pylyshyn Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking: I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities , 2004 .

[40]  Abel G. Oliva,et al.  Gist of a scene , 2005 .

[41]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Electrophysiological Measures of Maintaining Representations in Visual Working Memory , 2007, Cortex.

[42]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  Nicolas Davidenko Silhouetted face profiles: a new methodology for face perception research. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[44]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity is task dependent: evidence from selective search. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[45]  Erik Blaser,et al.  Tracking an object through feature space , 2000, Nature.

[46]  L. Feigenson,et al.  Multiple Spatially Overlapping Sets Can Be Enumerated in Parallel , 2006, Psychological science.

[47]  G. Calvert Crossmodal processing in the human brain: insights from functional neuroimaging studies. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  The Role of Spatial Attention in the Selection of Real and Illusory Objects , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  N. Cowan,et al.  Visual working memory depends on attentional filtering , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  David E. Fencsik,et al.  Velocity cues improve visual search and multiple object tracking , 2005 .

[51]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[52]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional and oculomotor capture with static singletons , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  Ashleigh M. Richard,et al.  Establishing object correspondence across eye movements: Flexible use of spatiotemporal and surface feature information , 2008, Cognition.

[54]  J. Henderson Regarding Scenes , 2007 .

[55]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Associative grouping: Perceptual grouping of shapes by association , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[56]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrocortical substrates of visual selective attention , 1993 .

[57]  J. Driver,et al.  Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[58]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[59]  Ke Zhou,et al.  Cue Validity and Object-Based Attention , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  M. Jones,et al.  Temporal Aspects of Stimulus-Driven Attending in Dynamic Arrays , 2002, Psychological science.

[61]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Multiple Object Tracking in People With Williams Syndrome and in Normally Developing Children , 2005, Psychological science.

[62]  Jefferson D. Grubb,et al.  Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[63]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[64]  G. Karmos,et al.  Entrainment of Neuronal Oscillations as a Mechanism of Attentional Selection , 2008, Science.

[65]  Chih-Jen Wei,et al.  Characterizing the Limits of Human Visual Awareness , 2007 .

[66]  S. Tripathy,et al.  Severe loss of positional information when detecting deviations in multiple trajectories. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[67]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[68]  N. Bolognini,et al.  Visual localization of sounds , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[69]  J. Enns,et al.  What's next? New evidence for prediction in human vision , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[70]  Melissa L.-H. Võ,et al.  A glimpse is not a glimpse: Differential processing of flashed scene previews leads to differential target search benefits , 2010 .

[71]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[72]  A. Hollingworth,et al.  Object correspondence across brief occlusion is established on the basis of both spatiotemporal and surface feature cues , 2009, Cognition.

[73]  G. Alvarez,et al.  Space and time, not surface features, guide object persistence , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[74]  S Yantis,et al.  Allocating visual attention: tests of a two-process model. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[75]  Charles Spence,et al.  Multisensory synesthetic interactions in the speeded classification of visual size , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[76]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[77]  D. Ariely Seeing Sets: Representation by Statistical Properties , 2001, Psychological science.

[78]  S J Luck,et al.  Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. I. Evidence for early selection. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[79]  U. Ansorge,et al.  Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[80]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[81]  E. Vogel,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Working Memory Represents a Fixed Number of Items Regardless of Complexity , 2022 .

[82]  Walter Gerbino,et al.  Convexity and Symmetry in Figure-Ground Organization , 1976 .

[83]  J. Theeuwes Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[84]  M. Chun,et al.  Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects , 2006, Nature.

[85]  J. Jonides Further toward a model of the Mind’s eye’s movement , 1983 .

[86]  M. Potter Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[87]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Is motion extrapolation employed in multiple object tracking? Tracking as a low-level, non-predictive function , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[88]  S. Coren,et al.  Principles of perceptual organization and spatial distortion: the gestalt illusions. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[89]  Jay Pratt,et al.  Determining whether attentional control settings are inclusive or exclusive , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[90]  E. Vogel,et al.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[91]  Alejandro Lleras,et al.  Temporal tuning and attentional gating: Two distinct attentional mechanisms on the perception of rapid serial visual events , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[92]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[93]  Kazuhiko Yokosawa,et al.  Attentional awakening: gradual modulation of temporal attention in rapid serial visual presentation , 2008, Psychological research.

[94]  J. Henderson,et al.  Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[95]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Modulation of long-range neural synchrony reflects temporal limitations of visual attention in humans. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[96]  Giuseppe di Pellegrino,et al.  Neuropsychological Evidence of an Integrated Visuotactile Representation of Peripersonal Space in Humans , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[97]  R W Remington,et al.  The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[98]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Feature binding in attentive tracking of distinct objects , 2009, Visual cognition.

[99]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention , 2000 .

[100]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[101]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Tracking the Location of Visuospatial Attention in a Contingent Capture Paradigm , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[102]  D. Meyer,et al.  Analyses of multinomial mixture distributions: new tests for stochastic models of cognition and action. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[103]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[104]  James E. Reilly,et al.  Selective Nontarget Inhibition in Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) , 2008 .