Accuracy of the spider model in decomposing layered surfaces

The surface of most natural objects is composed of two or more layers whose optical properties jointly determine the surface's overall reflectance. Light transmission through these layers can be approximated by using the Lambert-Beer (LB) model, which provides a good trade-off between the accuracy and simplicity to handle layer decomposition. Recently, a layer decomposition based on the LB-based model is proposed. Assuming surfaces with two layers, it estimates the reflectance of top and bottom layers, as well as the opacity of the top layer. The method introduces the “spider model”, which is named after the color distribution in the RGB space that resembles the shape of spiders. In this paper, we intend to verify the accuracy of the spider model and the optical model where it is based on (i.e., the LB-based model). We verify the LB-based model by comparing to the Kubelka-Munk (KM) model, which has previously been shown to be reliably accurate. The benefits of layer decomposition are easy to notice. First, many computer vision algorithms assume a single layer, and tend to fail when encountering multi-layered surfaces. Second, knowing the optical properties of each layer can provide further knowledge of the target objects.

[1]  Gunther Wyszecki,et al.  Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae, 2nd Edition , 2000 .

[2]  Audrey Tarrant,et al.  Color in Business, Science and Industry , 1976 .

[3]  E. H. Linfoot Principles of Optics , 1961 .

[4]  David Salesin,et al.  A Bayesian approach to digital matting , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[5]  Pat Hanrahan,et al.  Modeling and rendering of metallic patinas , 1996, SIGGRAPH.

[6]  G. R. Wilkinson Reflectance Spectroscopy , 1968, Nature.

[7]  Norimichi Tsumura,et al.  Independent Component Analysis of Skin Color Image , 1998, CIC.

[8]  Dani Lischinski,et al.  A Closed-Form Solution to Natural Image Matting , 2008 .

[9]  P. S Mudgett,et al.  Multiple scattering calculations for technology II , 1972 .

[10]  Gary W. Meyer,et al.  Modeling pigmented materials for realistic image synthesis , 1992, TOGS.

[11]  David Salesin,et al.  Computer-generated watercolor , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[12]  G. Rybicki Radiative transfer , 2019, Climate Change and Terrestrial Ecosystem Modeling.

[13]  S. G. Narasimhan,et al.  Interactive Deweathering of An Image Using Physical Model , 2003 .

[14]  Beer Bestimmung der Absorption des rothen Lichts in farbigen Flüssigkeiten , 1852 .

[15]  P. Kubelka Ein Beitrag zur Optik der Farban striche , 1931 .

[16]  L. Richards,et al.  Multiple scattering calculations for technology. , 1971, Applied optics.

[17]  K. Lempert,et al.  CONDENSED 1,3,5-TRIAZEPINES - IV THE SYNTHESIS OF 2,3-DIHYDRO-1H-IMIDAZO-[1,2-a] [1,3,5] BENZOTRIAZEPINES , 1983 .

[18]  Katsushi Ikeuchi,et al.  Estimating optical properties of layered surfaces using the spider model , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[19]  R. Anderson,et al.  The optics of human skin. , 1981, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[20]  Norimichi Tsumura,et al.  Image-based skin color and texture analysis/synthesis by extracting hemoglobin and melanin information in the skin , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[21]  F. Billmeyer,et al.  Principles of color technology , 1967 .

[22]  Hugh R. Davidson,et al.  Color Prediction Using the Two-Constant Turbid-Media Theory* , 1966 .