Making “concreteness fading” more concrete as a theory of instruction for promoting transfer

Abstract To promote learning and transfer of abstract ideas, contemporary theories advocate that teachers and learners make explicit connections between concrete representations and the abstract ideas they are intended to represent. Concreteness fading is a theory of instruction that offers a solution for making these connections. As originally conceived, it is a three-step progression that begins with enacting a physical instantiation of a concept, moves to an iconic depiction and then fades to the more abstract representation of the same concept. The goals of this paper are: (1) to improve the theoretical framework of concreteness fading by defining and bringing greater clarity to the terms abstract, concrete and fading; and (2) to describe several testable hypotheses that stem from concreteness fading as a theory of instruction. Making this theory of instruction more “concrete” should lead to an optimised concreteness fading technique with greater promise for facilitating both learning and transfer.

[1]  David W. Carraher,et al.  Mathematics in the streets and in schools , 1985 .

[2]  Mitchell J. Nathan,et al.  The Real Story Behind Story Problems: Effects of Representations on Quantitative Reasoning , 2004 .

[3]  Michelle Perry,et al.  Activation of Real-World Knowledge in the Solution of Word Problems , 1989 .

[4]  F. Saussure,et al.  Course in General Linguistics , 1960 .

[5]  Karl S. Rosengren,et al.  The Credible Shrinking Room: Very Young Children's Performance With Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Relations , 1997 .

[6]  R. Arnheim Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye, New version , 1955 .

[7]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Illustrating Principled Design: The Early Evolution of a Cognitive Tutor for Algebra Symbolization , 1998, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[8]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  An Investigation of Teachers' Beliefs of Students' Algebra Development , 2000, Cognition and Instruction.

[9]  Erin Ottmar,et al.  Concreteness Fading of Algebraic Instruction: Effects on Learning , 2017 .

[10]  Kira J. Carbonneau,et al.  A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives , 2013 .

[11]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Activity and Imagined Activity Can Enhance Young Children's Reading Comprehension. , 2004 .

[12]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[13]  Nicole M. McNeil,et al.  Should you show me the money? Concrete objects both hurt and help performance on mathematics problems , 2009 .

[14]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  Martha W. Alibali,et al.  Building Cohesion Across Representations: A Mechanism for STEM Integration , 2013 .

[16]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[17]  Koen Veermans,et al.  Exploring the effects of concreteness fading across grades in elementary school science education , 2018 .

[18]  Mitchell J. Nathan Rethinking Formalisms in Formal Education , 2012 .

[19]  Candace Walkington,et al.  A comparison of symbol -precedence view in investigative and conventional textbooks used in algebra courses , 2016 .

[20]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education , 2002 .

[21]  Emily R. Fyfe,et al.  Benefits of "concreteness fading" for children's mathematics understanding * , 2015 .

[22]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The Transfer of Scientific Principles Using Concrete and Idealized Simulations , 2005, Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[23]  Jon R. Star,et al.  The Power of Comparison in Learning and Instruction: Learning Outcomes Supported by Different Types of Comparisons , 2011 .

[24]  Karin Schwab,et al.  Toward A Theory Of Instruction , 2016 .

[25]  David W. Carraher,et al.  The Evolution of Mathematical Reasoning: Everyday versus Idealized Understandings , 2002 .

[26]  K. Scherer,et al.  How Seductive Details Do Their Damage : A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning , 2004 .

[27]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  Examining the Effects of Different Multiple Representational Systems in Learning Primary Mathematics , 2002 .

[28]  J. Piaget Science of education and the psychology of the child , 1970 .

[29]  Markku Niemivirta,et al.  Predictors and outcomes of situational interest during a science learning task , 2013 .

[30]  Emily R. Fyfe,et al.  “Concreteness fading” promotes transfer of mathematical knowledge , 2012 .

[31]  Vladimir M Sloutsky,et al.  The Advantage of Abstract Examples in Learning Math , 2008, Science.

[32]  Nicole M. McNeil,et al.  Effects of perceptually rich manipulatives on preschoolers' counting performance: established knowledge counts. , 2013, Child development.

[33]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Concreteness Fading in Mathematics and Science Instruction: a Systematic Review , 2014 .

[34]  J. Deloache Dual representation and young children's use of scale models. , 2000, Child development.

[35]  Ferdinand de Saussure,et al.  1959[1906-1911]. Course in General Linguistics, translated by Wade Baskin, selected 114–117, 120–122. New York: Philosophical Library , 2014 .

[36]  Ernest C. D. M. van Lieshout,et al.  The effect of illustrations in arithmetic problem-solving: Effects of increased cognitive load , 2009 .

[37]  Meixia Ding,et al.  Transition from concrete to abstract representations: the distributive property in a Chinese textbook series , 2014 .

[38]  H. Freudenthal Didactical Phenomenology of Mathematical Structures , 1983 .

[39]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Connecting instances to promote children's relational reasoning. , 2011, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[40]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Integrating Formal and Grounded Representations in Combinatorics Learning , 2013 .

[41]  Susan K. Peterson,et al.  Teaching Learning Disabled Students Place Value Using the Concrete to Abstract Sequence. , 1988 .

[42]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  Trade-Offs Between Grounded and Abstract Representations: Evidence From Algebra Problem Solving , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  Nathan Houser,et al.  The Essential Peirce: Volume 2 , 2001 .

[44]  R. Arnheim Art and Visual Perception, a Psychology of the Creative Eye , 1967 .

[45]  J. Deloache,et al.  Manipulatives as symbols: A new perspective on the use of concrete objects to teach mathematics , 1997 .

[46]  M. Chi,et al.  The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes , 2014 .

[47]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Representation sequencing in computer-based engineering education , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[48]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[49]  Vladimir M Sloutsky,et al.  The cost of concreteness: the effect of nonessential information on analogical transfer. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[50]  Gary Lupyan,et al.  The Paradox of the Universal Triangle: Concepts, Language, and Prototypes , 2017, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[51]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[52]  R. A. Engle Framing Interactions to Foster Generative Learning: A Situative Explanation of Transfer in a Community of Learners Classroom , 2006 .

[53]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  How abstract is symbolic thought? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[54]  Daniel M. Belenky,et al.  The Effects of Idealized and Grounded Materials on Learning, Transfer, and Interest: An Organizing Framework for Categorizing External Knowledge Representations , 2014 .

[55]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning. IES Practice Guide. NCER 2007-2004. , 2007 .

[56]  J. Sherman,et al.  Equivalence in symbolic and nonsymbolic contexts: Benefits of solving problems with manipulatives. , 2009 .

[57]  S. Miller,et al.  Using Evidence‐Based Practices to Build Mathematics Competence Related to Conceptual, Procedural, and Declarative Knowledge , 2007 .

[58]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Physically Distributed Learning: Adapting and Reinterpreting Physical Environments in the Development of Fraction Concepts , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[59]  Susan P. Miller,et al.  Fraction Instruction for Students with Mathematics Disabilities: Comparing Two Teaching Sequences , 2003 .

[60]  Vladimir M. Sloutsky,et al.  Transfer of Mathematical Knowledge: The Portability of Generic Instantiations , 2009 .

[61]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  The effects of realism in learning with dynamic visualizations , 2009 .

[62]  K.P.E. Gravemeijer,et al.  Preamble: From Models to Modeling , 2002 .

[63]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Fostering general transfer with specific simulations , 2009 .