Modeling and Prediction of Ride-Sharing Utilization Dynamics

The potential of an efficient ride-sharing scheme to significantly reduce traffic congestion, lower emission level, and drivers’ stress, as well as facilitating the introduction of smart cities has been widely demonstrated in recent years. Furthermore, ride sharing can be implemented within a sound economic regime through the involvement of commercial services that creates a win-win for all parties (e.g., Uber, Lyft or Sidecar). This positive thrust however is faced with several delaying factors, one of which is the volatility and unpredictability of the potential benefit (or utilization) of ride-sharing at different times, and in different places. Better understanding of ride-sharing dynamics can help policy makers and urban planners in increase the city’s “ride-sharing friendliness” either by designing new ride-sharing oriented systems, as well as by providing ride-sharing service operators better tools to optimize their services. In this work the following research questions are posed: (a) Is ride-sharing utilization stable over time or does it undergo significant changes? (b) If ride-sharing utilization is dynamic can it be correlated with some traceable features of the traffic? and (c) If ride-sharing utilization is dynamic can it be predicted ahead of time? We analyze a dataset of over 14 million taxi trips taken in New York City. We propose a dynamic travel network approach for modeling and forecasting the potential ride-sharing utilization over time, showing it to be highly volatile. In order to model the utilization's dynamics, we propose a network-centric approach, projecting the aggregated traffic taken from continuous time periods into a feature space comprised of topological features of the network implied by this traffic. This feature space is then used to model the dynamics of ride-sharing utilization over time. The results of our analysis demonstrate the significant volatility of ride-sharing utilization over time, indicating that any policy, design, or plan that would disregard this aspect and chose a static paradigm would undoubtably be either highly inefficient or provide insufficient resources. We show that using our suggested approach it is possible to model the potential utilization of ride sharing based on the topological properties of the rides network. We also show that using this method the potential utilization can be forecasting a few hours ahead of time. One anecdotal derivation of the latter is that perfectly guessing the destination of a New York taxi rider becomes nearly three times easier than rolling a “Snake Eyes” at a casino.

[1]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[2]  Terry L. Friesz,et al.  TRANSPORTATION NETWORK EQUILIBRIUM, DESIGN AND AGGREGATION: KEY DEVELOPMENTS AND RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES. IN: THE AUTOMOBILE , 1985 .

[3]  Martin W. P. Savelsbergh,et al.  Dynamic ridesharing: Is there a role for dedicated drivers? , 2015 .

[4]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Incremental Learning with Accuracy Prediction of Social and Individual Properties from Mobile-Phone Data , 2011, 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing.

[5]  Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al.  Efficient and inefficient ant coverage methods , 2001, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[6]  David Lazer,et al.  The Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation , 2007 .

[7]  R. Tachet,et al.  Scaling Law of Urban Ride Sharing , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[8]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework , 2012, HICSS.

[9]  Yaniv Altshuler,et al.  Static and expanding grid coverage with ant robots: Complexity results , 2011, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[10]  Yaniv Altshuler,et al.  Workforce optimization: Identification and assignment of professional workers using constraint programming , 2007, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[11]  Martin W. P. Savelsbergh,et al.  Making dynamic ride-sharing work: The impact of driver and rider flexibility , 2016 .

[12]  A-L Barabási,et al.  Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Social Behavior Bias and Knowledge Management Optimization , 2015, SBP.

[14]  G. Madey,et al.  Uncovering individual and collective human dynamics from mobile phone records , 2007, 0710.2939.

[15]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Smart Cities in Europe , 2011 .

[16]  Sven Koenig,et al.  Ridesharing : The state-ofthe-art and future directions , 2013 .

[17]  Shlomo Bekhor,et al.  Augmented Betweenness Centrality for Environmentally Aware Traffic Monitoring in Transportation Networks , 2013, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[18]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  A Tale of Many Cities: Universal Patterns in Human Urban Mobility , 2011, PloS one.

[19]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Some Simplified NP-Complete Graph Problems , 1976, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[20]  Shlomo Bekhor,et al.  Augmented Betweenness Centrality for Mobility Prediction in Transportation Networks , 2011 .

[21]  Martin W. P. Savelsbergh,et al.  Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Eleonora D'Andrea,et al.  Path Clustering Based on a Novel Dissimilarity Function for Ride-Sharing Recommenders , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP).

[23]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Stealing Reality: When Criminals Become Data Scientists (or Vice Versa) , 2011, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[24]  Yu Zheng,et al.  T-share: A large-scale dynamic taxi ridesharing service , 2013, 2013 IEEE 29th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE).

[25]  Marta C. González,et al.  Origin-destination trips by purpose and time of day inferred from mobile phone data , 2015 .

[26]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Conditions that impact the complexity of QoS routing , 2005, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[27]  César A. Hidalgo,et al.  Unique in the Crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Shlomo Bekhor,et al.  Incorporating Ridesharing in the Static Traffic Assignment Model , 2015, Networks and Spatial Economics.

[29]  Stephan Winter,et al.  Activity-based ridesharing: increasing flexibility by time geography , 2016, SIGSPATIAL/GIS.

[30]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Predicting Personality Using Novel Mobile Phone-Based Metrics , 2013, SBP.

[31]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  North American Carsharing , 2009 .

[32]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Computational Social Science , 2009, Science.

[33]  Nicholas C. Valler,et al.  Got the Flu (or Mumps)? Check the Eigenvalue! , 2010, 1004.0060.

[34]  Niels A. H. Agatz,et al.  The Benefits of Meeting Points in Ride-Sharing Systems , 2015 .

[35]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Decoding Social Influence and the Wisdom of the Crowd in Financial Trading Network , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing.

[36]  Carlos Riquelme,et al.  Dynamic pricing in ridesharing platforms , 2016, SECO.

[37]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[38]  Juliana Freire,et al.  STaRS: Simulating Taxi Ride Sharing at Scale , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Big Data.

[39]  Israel A. Wagner,et al.  Efficient cooperative search of smart targets using UAV Swarms1 , 2008, Robotica.

[40]  Ata M. Khan,et al.  Modelling urban transportation emissions: role of GIS , 2004, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[41]  Daniel Graziotin An Analysis of issues against the adoption of Dynamic Carpooling , 2013, ArXiv.

[42]  Athina Markopoulou,et al.  Assessing the Potential of Ride-Sharing Using Mobile and Social Data , 2013 .

[43]  S. Hobrink Explaining Regional Adoption Differentials in Dutch Car Sharing Markets , 2014 .

[44]  M. Zelen,et al.  Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples☆ , 1989 .

[45]  Marta C. González,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Real-time Ridesharing on Urban Traffic using Mobile Phone Data , 2015 .

[46]  Sven Koenig,et al.  Building Terrain-Covering Ant Robots: A Feasibility Study , 2004, Auton. Robots.

[47]  Behram F. T. Mistree,et al.  Gaydar: Facebook Friendships Expose Sexual Orientation , 2009, First Monday.

[48]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Dynamic Ride-Sharing and Optimal Fleet Sizing for a System of Shared Autonomous Vehicles , 2015 .

[49]  Fernando Ordóñez,et al.  Ridesharing: The state-of-the-art and future directions , 2013 .

[50]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[51]  Carlo Ratti,et al.  Understanding individual mobility patterns from urban sensing data: A mobile phone trace example , 2013 .

[52]  Yaniv Altshuler,et al.  Multi-agent Cooperative Cleaning of Expanding Domains , 2011, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[53]  Kotagiri Ramamohanarao,et al.  Optimal Pick up Point Selection for Effective Ride Sharing , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Big Data.

[54]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  On-demand high-capacity ride-sharing via dynamic trip-vehicle assignment , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Clustering for set partitioning with a case study in ridesharing , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[56]  ZVI GALIL,et al.  Efficient algorithms for finding maximum matching in graphs , 1986, CSUR.

[57]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Epidemic thresholds in real networks , 2008, TSEC.

[58]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[59]  Kostas Bimpikis,et al.  Spatial Pricing in Ride-Sharing Networks , 2019, Oper. Res..

[60]  F. Koppelman,et al.  The generalized nested logit model , 2001 .

[61]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Understanding individual human mobility patterns , 2008, Nature.

[62]  T. Geisel,et al.  The scaling laws of human travel , 2006, Nature.

[63]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Limits of Predictability in Human Mobility , 2010, Science.

[64]  P. Bonacich Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification , 1972 .

[65]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[66]  Chengcheng Dai Ridesharing Recommendation: Whether and Where Should I Wait? , 2016, WAIM.

[67]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Towards a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions , 2012 .

[68]  Shlomo Bekhor,et al.  On the Rationality and Optimality of Transportation Networks Defense , 2015 .

[69]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Campaign Optimization Through Behavioral Modeling and Mobile Network Analysis , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems.

[70]  J. Wardrop ROAD PAPER. SOME THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF ROAD TRAFFIC RESEARCH. , 1952 .

[71]  Barun Chandra,et al.  Greedy local improvement and weighted set packing approximation , 2001, SODA '99.

[72]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Sensing, Understanding, and Shaping Social Behavior , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems.

[73]  Alex Pentland,et al.  The Strength of the Strongest Ties in Collaborative Problem Solving , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[74]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[75]  Josep Domingo-Ferrer,et al.  Co-utile P2P ridesharing via decentralization and reputation management , 2016 .

[76]  Paolo Santi,et al.  Supporting Information for Quantifying the Benefits of Vehicle Pooling with Shareability Networks Data Set and Pre-processing , 2022 .

[77]  P. Waddell,et al.  Factors affecting the adoption of vehicle sharing systems by young drivers , 2013 .

[78]  Maged Dessouky,et al.  A traffic assignment model for a ridesharing transportation market , 2015 .

[79]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[80]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Human collective intelligence as distributed Bayesian inference , 2016, ArXiv.

[81]  Zhaohui Wu,et al.  Prediction of urban human mobility using large-scale taxi traces and its applications , 2012, Frontiers of Computer Science.