On the origins of dynamical awareness.

An inquiry into the origins of dynamical awareness is conducted. Particular attention is given to a theory that postulates that impressions of dynamical quantities are derived from and structured by lawful physical relations. It is shown that impressions of dynamical quantities are not generally correlated with the values that these quantities take in the equations of motion but rather are highly correlated with simple ratios of kinematic quantities or with specific kinematic features that do not specify the underlying dynamics. It is argued that kinematic information, to the extent that it is used, is used heuristically, and its availability for dynamical analysis is constrained by general principles of organization. A formal analysis of the physical organization implicit in the specification of dynamical invariants is given and compared with types of perceptual organization that are observed.

[1]  H. Bastian.  Sensation and Perception.—I , 1869, Nature.

[2]  R. C. Oldfield.  THE PERCEPTION OF CAUSALITY , 1963 .

[3]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  On the Logic of Perception , 1969 .

[4]  W. Köhler.  Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology , 1970 .

[5]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[6]  B Julesz,et al.  Experiments in the visual perception of texture. , 1975, Scientific American.

[7]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues , 1977 .

[8]  J. Cutting.  Generation of Synthetic Male and Female Walkers through Manipulation of a Biomechanical Invariant , 1978, Perception.

[9]  F. Roberts.  Measurement Theory with Applications to Decisionmaking, Utility, and the Social Sciences: Measurement Theory , 1984 .

[10]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[11]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Robert Shaw.  Strange Attractors, Chaotic Behavior, and Information Flow , 1981 .

[13]  S. Runeson,et al.  Visual perception of lifted weight. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual Perception of Relative Mass in Dynamic Events , 1982, Perception.

[15]  S. Runeson.  On visual perception of dynamic events , 1983 .

[16]  P. Holmes,et al.  Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields , 1983, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[17]  Andrew P. Witkin,et al.  Scale-Space Filtering , 1983, IJCAI.

[18]  S. Runeson,et al.  Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expe , 1983 .

[19]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[20]  M K Kaiser,et al.  The development of sensitivity to causally relevant dynamic information. , 1984, Child development.

[21]  R. Shepard.  Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. , 1984, Psychological review.

[22]  A. Treisman,et al.  Emergent features, attention, and object perception. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Peter Klopfer,et al.  The Ontogeny of Information , 1985 .

[24]  Harry G. Barrow,et al.  Computational approaches to vision , 1986 .

[25]  M K Kaiser,et al.  Observers’ sensitivity to dynamic anomalies in collisions , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  W H Warren,et al.  The Way the Ball Bounces: Visual and Auditory Perception of Elasticity and Control of the Bounce Pass , 1987, Perception.

[27]  G. Bingham,et al.  Kinematic form and scaling: further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Understanding natural dynamics. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  D R Proffitt,et al.  Understanding collision dynamics. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Perceiving fractal noises in pitch, loudness, and duration , 1989 .

[31]  E. Goldstein.  Sensation and perception, 3rd ed. , 1989 .

[32]  Vilayanur S. Ramachandran,et al.  Theories of Perception. , 1951 .

[33]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Understanding wheel dynamics , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  John B. Pittenger,et al.  Detection of Violations of the Law of Pendulum Motion: Observers' Sensitivity to the Relation Between Period and Length , 1990 .

[35]  R. Shepard,et al.  Psychologically simple motions as geodesic paths. part I. Asymmetric objects , 1990 .