Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task.

[1]  D. Spalding The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[2]  J. Piaget Play, dreams and imitation in childhood , 1951 .

[3]  J. L. Gewirtz,et al.  Learning of generalized imitation as the basis for identification. , 1968, Psychological review.

[4]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. , 1970, Psychological review.

[5]  A. Greenwald,et al.  A choice reaction time test of ideomotor theory. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  Simple reaction times of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized visual stimuli. , 1971, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  A. Greenwald,et al.  On doing two things at once: time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[9]  J. Callan,et al.  Strength of auditory stimulus-response compatibility as a function of task complexity. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  G. Tassinari,et al.  Influence of spatial stimulus-response compatibility on reaction time of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized light stimuli. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Imitation of Facial and Manual Gestures by Human Neonates , 1977, Science.

[12]  R. Ratcliff Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  T. Bashore,et al.  Vocal and manual reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transmission time. , 1981, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  H. Williams,et al.  Auditory responses in avian vocal motor neurons: a motor theory for song perception in birds. , 1985, Science.

[15]  A new look at reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transmission time , 1988 .

[16]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[17]  R. Nicoletti,et al.  Is interhemispheric transfer of visuomotor information asymmetric? Evidence from a meta-analysis , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  T Hasbroucq,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: toward a conceptual clarification. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  J. Bargh The ecology of automaticity: toward establishing the conditions needed to produce automatic processing effects. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[20]  G. Fiorito,et al.  Observational Learning in Octopus vulgaris , 1992, Science.

[21]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  S. Kornblum,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  B. Hommel The Quarterly Journal Of Experimental Psychology, 1996 , 49a (3) , 546 571 , 2022 .

[24]  B. Hommel Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility , 1997 .

[25]  W. Prinz,et al.  Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility , 1997 .

[26]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: a study of imitation. , 2000 .

[27]  G Aschersleben,et al.  Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: a study of imitation. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.