Climate warming disrupts mast seeding and its fitness benefits in European beech

[1]  O. Bjørnstad,et al.  A resource budget model to explain intraspecific variation in mast reproductive dynamics , 2007, Ecological Research.

[2]  S. Nilsson,et al.  Seed predation and cross-pollination in mast-seeding beech (Fagus sylvatica) patches , 1987 .

[3]  X. Moreira,et al.  Masting promotes individual- and population-level reproduction by increasing pollination efficiency. , 2014, Ecology.

[4]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[5]  Wolfgang Cramer,et al.  The effects of fragmentation and disturbance of rainforest on ground‐dwelling small mammals on the Robertson Plateau, New South Wales, Australia , 1996, Journal of Biogeography.

[6]  Josh Kemp,et al.  Large‐scale pest control in New Zealand beech forests , 2016 .

[7]  T. Sanders,et al.  Reproducing reproduction: how to simulate mast seeding in forest models , 2018 .

[8]  Eliot J. B. McIntire,et al.  Sex allocation, pollen limitation and masting in whitebark pine , 2013 .

[9]  D. Whitehead,et al.  CLIMATE AND NET CARBON AVAILABILITY DETERMINE TEMPORAL PATTERNS OF SEED PRODUCTION BY NOTHOFAGUS , 2005 .

[10]  Ostfeld,et al.  Pulsed resources and community dynamics of consumers in terrestrial ecosystems. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  M. Turco,et al.  Spatial patterns and broad-scale weather cues of beech mast seeding in Europe. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[12]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  The role of nutrients, productivity and climate in determining tree fruit production in European forests. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[13]  Michał Bogdziewicz,et al.  Masting in wind-pollinated trees: system-specific roles of weather and pollination dynamics in driving seed production. , 2017, Ecology.

[14]  A. Tanentzap,et al.  Resource limitation underlying multiple masting models makes mast seeding sensitive to future climate change. , 2016, The New phytologist.

[15]  W. Verstraeten,et al.  Relating increasing hantavirus incidences to the changing climate: the mast connection , 2009, International journal of health geographics.

[16]  J. Canadell,et al.  Atmospheric deposition, CO2, and change in the land carbon sink , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[17]  J. Canadell,et al.  Global trends in carbon sinks and their relationships with CO2 and temperature , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[18]  Review for "From theory to experiments for testing the proximate mechanisms of mast seeding: an agenda for an experimental ecology" , 2019 .

[19]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  Numerical and behavioral effects within a pulse-driven system: consequences for shared prey. , 2008, Ecology.

[20]  P. Jones,et al.  An Ensemble Version of the E‐OBS Temperature and Precipitation Data Sets , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[21]  Mark Rees,et al.  Snow Tussocks, Chaos, and the Evolution of Mast Seeding , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[22]  Josep Peñuelas,et al.  A global change‐induced biome shift in the Montseny mountains (NE Spain) , 2003 .

[23]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Pollen coupling of forest trees: forming synchronized and periodic reproduction out of chaos. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  Dave Kelly,et al.  Dissecting components of population‐level variation in seed production and the evolution of masting behavior , 2003 .

[25]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Climate relationships of growth and establishment across the altitudinal range of Fagus sylvatica in the Montseny Mountains, northeast Spain , 2007 .

[26]  D. Kelly,et al.  The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  I. Pearse,et al.  Inter-annual variation in seed production has increased over time (1900–2014) , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  I. Pearse,et al.  Mechanisms of mast seeding: resources, weather, cues, and selection. , 2016, The New phytologist.

[29]  R. Allen,et al.  EVALUATING THE WIND POLLINATION BENEFITS OF MAST SEEDING , 2001 .

[30]  G. Kirk,et al.  Long-term increases in soil carbon due to ecosystem fertilization by atmospheric nitrogen deposition demonstrated by regional-scale modelling and observations , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[31]  Jana Vogel,et al.  Model Selection And Multimodel Inference , 2016 .

[32]  Michał Bogdziewicz,et al.  Rapid aggregative and reproductive responses of weevils to masting of North American oaks counteract predator satiation. , 2018, Ecology.

[33]  L. K. Ward,et al.  Juniperus communis: victim of the combined action of climate warming and nitrogen deposition? , 2009, Plant biology.

[34]  William G. Lee,et al.  Effect of climate change on mast‐seeding species: frequency of mass flowering and escape from specialist insect seed predators , 1998 .

[35]  M. Sykes,et al.  Masting behaviour and dendrochronology of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in southern Sweden , 2010 .

[36]  Miroslav Svoboda,et al.  Forest disturbances under climate change. , 2017, Nature climate change.

[37]  Michał Bogdziewicz,et al.  Correlated seed failure as an environmental veto to synchronize reproduction of masting plants , 2017, bioRxiv.

[38]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Responses to a Warming World , 2001, Science.

[39]  Dave Kelly,et al.  MAST SEEDING IN PERENNIAL PLANTS: Why, How, Where? , 2002 .

[40]  J. Knops,et al.  Is the relationship between mast-seeding and weather in oaks related to their life-history or phylogeny? , 2016, Ecology.

[41]  A. Friend,et al.  Climatically controlled reproduction drives interannual growth variability in a temperate tree species , 2018, Ecology letters.

[42]  X. Moreira,et al.  Variability in seed cone production and functional response of seed predators to seed cone availability: support for the predator satiation hypothesis , 2014 .

[43]  P. Thomas,et al.  THE ENGLISH BEECH MASTING SURVEY 1980–2007: VARIATION IN THE FRUITING OF THE COMMON BEECH (FAGUS SYLVATICA L.) AND ITS EFFECTS ON WOODLAND ECOSYSTEMS , 2008 .

[44]  Jonathan M Adams,et al.  Masting behaviour in beech: linking reproduction and climatic variation , 2001 .

[45]  J. Retana,et al.  Masting mediated by summer drought reduces acorn predation in Mediterranean oak forests. , 2008, Ecology.

[46]  Lazaros G. Papageorgiou,et al.  The importance of economies of scale, transport costs and demand patterns in optimising hydrogen fuelling infrastructure: An exploration with SHIPMod (Spatial hydrogen infrastructure planning model) , 2013 .

[47]  Mark A. Sutton,et al.  The influence of model grid resolution on estimation of national scale nitrogen deposition and exceedance of critical loads , 2011 .

[48]  Casper W. Berg,et al.  glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling , 2017, R J..

[49]  C. Zohner,et al.  Global warming reduces leaf-out and flowering synchrony among individuals , 2018, eLife.

[50]  D. Norton,et al.  Mast seeding over 33 years by Dacrydium cupressinum Lamb. (rimu) (Podocarpaceae) in New Zealand: the importance of economies of scale , 1988 .

[51]  A. Tanentzap,et al.  From theory to experiments for testing the proximate mechanisms of mast seeding: an agenda for an experimental ecology , 2019, Ecology letters.

[52]  William G. Lee,et al.  Of mast and mean: differential-temperature cue makes mast seeding insensitive to climate change. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[53]  R. Ohlemüller,et al.  Rapid Range Shifts of Species Associated with High Levels of Climate Warming , 2011, Science.

[54]  T. S. Jensen.  Seed-seed predator interactions of European beech, Fagus silvatica and forest rodents, Clethrionomys glareolus and Apodemus flavicollis. , 1985 .

[55]  William G. Lee,et al.  Predator satiation and extreme mast seeding in 11 species of Chionochloa (Poaceae) , 2000 .

[56]  Claude A. Garcia,et al.  The global tree restoration potential , 2019, Science.

[57]  J. Tewksbury,et al.  Do species' traits predict recent shifts at expanding range edges? , 2011, Ecology letters.

[58]  Advantages of masting in European beech: timing of granivore satiation and benefits of seed caching support the predator dispersal hypothesis , 2016, Oecologia.

[59]  Michał Bogdziewicz,et al.  Effects of nitrogen deposition on reproduction in a masting tree: benefits of higher seed production are trumped by negative biotic interactions , 2017 .

[60]  E. Crone,et al.  Resource depletion, pollen coupling, and the ecology of mast seeding , 2014, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[61]  J. Knops,et al.  What drives masting? The phenological synchrony hypothesis. , 2015, Ecology.

[62]  R. Thomson,et al.  Nest predator avoidance during habitat selection of a songbird varies with mast peaks and troughs , 2019, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[63]  O. Bjørnstad,et al.  Spatial Dynamics of Specialist Seed Predators on Synchronized and Intermittent Seed Production of Host Plants , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[64]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Both seedling banks and specialist seed predators promote the evolution of synchronized and intermittent reproduction (masting) in trees , 2010 .

[65]  O. Hoegh‐Guldberg,et al.  Ecological responses to recent climate change , 2002, Nature.

[66]  D. Pezzoli,et al.  Size matters for in vitro gene delivery: investigating the relationships among complexation protocol, transfection medium, size and sedimentation , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[67]  Eliot J. B. McIntire,et al.  Climatic change only stimulated growth for trees under weak competition in central boreal forests , 2019, Journal of Ecology.

[68]  Michał Bogdziewicz,et al.  How do vertebrates respond to mast seeding , 2016 .

[69]  Patrick H. Martin,et al.  Climate drivers of seed production in Picea engelmannii and response to warming temperatures in the southern Rocky Mountains , 2016 .